Home Blog Page 400

Costa Rica Powers 285 Days of 2015 With 100% Renewable Energy

Foto: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

In March, EcoWatch reported that Costa Rica powered the first 82 days of the year solely with renewable energy. Now that we’re closing in on the end of the year, the Costa Rican Electricity Institute (ICE) announced that the country ran entirely on renewables for 285 days between Jan. 1 and Dec. 17.
“We are closing 2015. with renewable electricity milestones that have put us in the global spotlight,” ICE electricity division chief Luis Pacheco told to AFP. The majority of the country’s energy (75 percent) comes from hydropower, thanks to a vast river system and abundant rainfall, and the rest of its renewables come from geothermal, biomass, wind and solar.

Despite a very dry year, ICE said it was ahead of its renewable energy targets and Pacheco predicted that 2016. would be an even better year because a new $2.3 billion hydroelectric plant will be coming online. The country reportedly wants to move away from its dependency on hydropower, though, and harness more of its electricity needs from geothermal and wind. It plans to retire its heavy fuel oil-powered Moin plant in 2017. and wants to move its transportation sector away from fossil fuels.

The country has made all this progress, while reducing overall energy costs, which fell by 12 percent this year and the ICE expects costs to keep falling. “The government has pledged to build an electric train which will be integrated with public buses,” Gabriel Goldschmidt, regional head of infrastructure for Latin America and Caribbean at the International Finance Corporation, which is part of the World Bank, told the Huffington Post. “There is also a proposal to start replacing oil-powered cars with electric cars as part of a new bill in congress that aims to offer consumer incentives to lower the prices of these cars.

This would have multiple benefits including better air quality. ”Costa Rica’s heavy reliance on hydropower has been criticized by some. Gary Wockner of Save the Colorado argues that hydropower is actually “one of the biggest environmental problems our planet faces” and a “false solution” for addressing climate change. “Hydropower has been called a ‘methane factory’ and ‘methane bomb’ that is just beginning to rear its ugly head as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions that have so-far been unaccounted for in climate change discussions and analyses,” Wockner said last month.

Still, the country is among the vanguard of nations around the world moving towards a 100 percent renewable energy future. Several countries have hit impressive benchmarks for renewables in just a few short years. And many places have already made the transition to fossil-fuel-free electricity.
Samso in Denmark became the world’s first island to go all in on renewables several years ago. Most recently, Uruguay, three U.S. cities—Burlington, Vermont; Aspen, Colorado; and Greensburg, Kansas—along with Kodiak Island, Alaska, have all made the transition. San Diego, Vancouver, Las Vegas and other major cities around the world have pledged to go 100 percent renewable. Sweden made headlines earlier this year when it pledged to be among the first countries to go fossil free.

Hawaii pledged to do so by 2045—the most ambitious standard set by a U.S. state thus far. Several other islands, including Aruba, Belize, St. Lucia, Grenada, the British Virgin Islands, the Bahamas, Turks and Caicos, and San Andres and Providence have pledged to go 100 percent renewable, through the Ten Island Challenge, created by Richard Branson’s climate group the Carbon War Room. Greenpeace and researchers at Stanford and UC Berkeley have laid out plans for every state in the U.S. to adopt 100 percent renewables and a Greenpeace report published in September posits the world can achieve 100 percent renewable energy by 2050. Mark Jacobson, one of the researchers from Stanford, said the barriers to 100 percent clean energy are social and political, not technical or economic.

Just last week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in an interview that “You could take a corner of Utah or Nevada and power the entire United States with solar power.” And, it looks as if the Paris climate conference earlier this month helped create market certainty in renewables, as fossil fuel stocks tumbled and renewable energy stocks soared. After the landmark Paris agreement was reached, the coal industry’s European lobbying association feared that the deal meant the sector “will be hated and vilified, in the same way that slave traders were once hated and vilified.”

Source: www.ecowatch.com

EBRD still can’t say no to destructive Macedonian dam

Foto-ilustracija: Wikimedia/Dr Richard Murray
Photo: Pixabay

The Bern Convention recommendation, warmly welcomed by Macedonian environmental organizations, was based on an independent expert study into the planned hydropower developments in Mavrovo, Europe’s oldest national park situated in the northwest of Macedonia and home to the endangered Balkan lynx.

The study authors found the hydropower development to be “not compatible with the status of protection of the park”, and concluded that the Boškov Most project “as currently designed must be abandoned until the conservation status of the Balkan lynx population is brought back to a safe level and until when the Mavrovo National Park is no longer the only known core area of reproduction of this species.”

The Committee’s decision also suggested international financial institutions revisit their involvement in hydropower projects in Mavrovo in anticipation of the conclusions of the upcoming SEA. In a statement on December 9, the EBRD quickly announced that it is “fully respecting” the Bern Convention recommendations. While stressing that no disbursements have yet been made on the EBRD board approved EUR 65 million financing for Boškov Most, the bank let it be known that it “will consider the results of the strategic environmental assessment of cumulative effects of all planned development activities on the territory of the Park when deciding on the financing of the hydropower projects in the Park.”

Responding to the Bern Convention’s recommendation, Ana Colović Lesoska, executive director of the Macedonian environmental group Eko-Svest, said: “The Committee has now sent an unequivocal message to the Macedonian government and everybody involved in this egregious project that protected areas are there for a reason. In light of today’s decision, the Macedonian government should seriously reconsider its plans for hydropower developments in the Mavrovo National Park.

Specifically, the government should engage the public and civil society in the decision-making process, and it should also acknowledge Macedonia’s international responsibility to protect wildlife and natural habitats in the park through allocating the necessary funds for the conservation of the Balkan Lynx population.” For five years now, Macedonian environmental organizations have raised their voices against planned hydropower plants in the Mavrovo National Park. They have repeatedly insisted that hydro dams in national parks result in the destruction of habitats and species, that they cannot contribute to nature conservation and, therefore, should be avoided.

However, the Macedonian government has been vigorous in its support of such energy developments and set out early to involve the EBRD in this roller coaster. In 2011, therefore, the EBRD approved a EUR 65 million loan for the Boškov Most.

The bank soon found out, if it had not known before, that the area of the planned dam is the core reproductive area of the fragile Balkan Lynx population. The EBRD doubtless gulped a bit more when the highly respected International Union for Conservation of Nature confirmed that the population of the Balkan Lynx is officially considered to be critically endangered – there are less than 40 individuals of this species left in the wild.

To date, fortunately, no project construction has started as the EBRD was knuckle rapped by its own complaints mechanism that it had failed to comply with its policies when deciding to finance a project in a critical habitat. As a result of the expert report from the EBRD complaints mechanism, more studies are in motion to assess whether Boškov Most is, yes, worth the sacrifice of the Mavrovo National Park. Last year, the project cost estimates jumped three times as the dam was estimated to cost around EUR 150 million and, if the EBRD is seriously considering further support, its Board of Directors would need to sign off on a new loan for the 68MW plant.

“The Boškov Most project has now become synonymous with endless trouble and it has already inflicted significant reputational damage on the EBRD,” says Fidanka Bacheva Mc Grath, EBRD campaign coordinator at Bank watch. “Surely the EBRD realizes it is only going to get worse as a new strategic impact assessment buys the project some more time, but is unlikely to contradict numerous assessments done to date. The recommendation to suspend the hydro power plans should give the EBRD enough reason to pull out of the project.” The SEA is expected to take another year, thus adding another two commitment fee tranches paid to the EBRD by Macedonian citizens, who neither want nature destruction nor getting poorer. In the four years since the signing of the Boškov Most project loan, ‘commitment fees’ paid to the EBRD by the Macedonian government has reached EUR 1,950,000.

Source: www. bankwatch.org

Porsche plant workers agree to less pay to produce electric car

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Porsche workers have agreed to concessions worth several hundred million euros to secure production of an all-electric sports car at the manufacturer’s biggest plant, a spokesman for the company said. The Volkswagen-owned manufacturer said earlier this month it would spend about 1 billion euros ($1.10 billion) at its base in Zuffenhausen and create more than 1,000 jobs there to build the battery-powered “Mission E” model.

But wage costs of the 13,000 workers employed at Zuffenhausen exceed those at Porsche’s other German factory in Leipzig and at a VW plant in Osnabruck where Porsche’s Cayman and Cayenne models are assembled, a source at Porsche said.” Employer and employees have jointly drawn up measures that have led to the decision of producing the Mission E model at Zuffenhausen,” a spokesman for Porsche said on Tuesday, confirming a report by German magazine Automobilwoche.

Cost-cutting measures agreed between workers at Zuffenhausen and management include steps to raise the workweek to 35 hours from 34 and to drop parts of a pay increase between 2016. and 2025., the magazine said. Porsche declined comment on details of the measures. Porsche’s works council did not return calls seeking comment.

www.businessinsider.com

Which countries generate the most power from renewables?

greencountriesNews that India has opened the first airport to be entirely powered by solar energy has underlined the growth in renewable energy. The sector has been growing strongly despite the dramatic fall in the price of oil and last year 59% of all new power generated around the world came from renewable sources.

The latest report from REN21, the global renewable energy policy network, shows that renewables made up an estimated 27.7% of the world’s power generating capacity at the end of 2014.
China leads the world in renewable-power capacity, with the United States some way behind in second place. Germany comes next, but only if hydroelectric power is excluded from the calculation. If hydro is included then Brazil takes the third spot.

Things look very different when capacity is measured on a per capita basis, with the top five countries all in Europe: Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Spain and Portugal.

www.weforum.org

Enviromental Protection is Primary Program for Companies

????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????
Sanja Ivanić

French-Serbian Chamber of Commerce has expended its number of members during 2015. and now it counts 130 companies. The chamber promotes arrival of French companies to Serbia form its foundation and it improves relations with other associations and chambers in Serbia. This institution strives to increase the presence of Serbian companies in French regions. France is the utmost investor in Europe, and it has invested around 500 million euros in Serbia.

These investments are not enough but they should be more significant bearing in mind that events, meetings, economic forms are held regularly. Sanja Ivanić is the executive manager of French-Serbian Chamber of Commerce and for Special COP 21, she talks about the importance of environmental protection of all companies operating in Serbia. She also highlights why it is important, to political and governmental will, to raise the awareness of climate changes to high level in private and economy sector.

 
EP: You are at the head of the Chamber of Commerce which improves business relations between France and Serbia. Many member companies belong to the energy sector; how do they prepare for the conference COP 21, and what is the best practice in France, which should be applied in Serbia?
Sanja Ivanić: As a network of successful companies, which take into account sustainable development in their business, we believe that the model of “green economy” enables economic growth, creates new workplaces and increases competitiveness. The fight against climate changes is also an opportunity for companies to introduce innovative solutions and to suggest new models of development. Several French companies, members of French-Serbian Chamber of Commerce have excellent examples of business practices that were recently presented at the Conference held at the Embassy of France. As companies that come from countries in which green economy is an issue of paramount importance and taking into account that French experience and achievements in this field, we have special responsibility to transfer this expertise to Serbian market.

EP: In your opinion, why is it important that companies take participation in the conference COP 21 in addition to numerous participants of the conference that come from governmental sector, NGO sector and international institutions?
Sanja Ivanić: It is necessary to establish a comprehensive public-private partnership for transition toward green economy by involving all relevant stakeholders and all castes. In addition to constant presence of our member companies at relevant conferences, fairs and public debates on the issue of green economy, French companies have an open cooperation with representatives of institutions and public sector on this issue. The economy is an indispensable stakeholder in environmental protection. Global companies have brought environmental protection into operation as one of the primary programmes as a part of business strategy of corporate social responsibility. We believe that the private sector plays an important role in this regard. After all, experience speaks about why it is necessary for the large private companies to be included in solving this important social issue.

EP: What would be your recommendation to the members of French-Serbian Chamber of Commerce for the future when it comes to the global warming, environmental protection and energy efficiency?
Sanja Ivanić: We pay special attention on raising awareness among young people, and we strive to motivate them as early as possible to make them think about the ways of implementing sustainable development in practice. The same year when the Chamber was created, we created the Student Award which is organised with the support of our companies that reward the best student’s papers and action plans on sustainable development. We have seen several really interesting student’s suggestions in the last five editions of the Prize, and that is the proof that our young generations are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of this issue for our economy and society in general.

Interviewed by Vesna Vukajlović

More breweries in USA going solar

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay

Six Western North Carolina breweries have installed solar panel systems, joining a fast-growing trend in business in general. North Carolina has been near the top of the solar pack and last year ranked second in the U.S. in the number of solar panel installations.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

“Solar is hot,” said Tom Kimbis, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade group tracking solar use in the U.S. Kimbis recently honored WNC’s six solar breweries with his organization’s Solar Champion Award.

Solar is the fastest-growing energy source in the country, he said. Its use is being powered by how much sunshine an area receives, the cost of solar versus conventional energy, and government incentives to install systems. A 30 percent federal solar energy tax credit has given businesses a push to charge up with sunshine, Kimbis said.

In North Carolina, a state solar tax credit has not been extended into the new year, Kimbis said Even without the state credit extension, solar use is surging in the Tar Heel state, he said. Current numbers show 189 solar energy companies in North Carolina, employing 5,600 people, he said.

The price of solar systems is continuing to drop, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. The average cost of a residential installation in the third quarter of this year was $3.55 per watt – that’s 46 percent lower than in 2010.

Here is how the area’s breweries stack up on solar:

Highland Brewing, Asheville

Solar panels: 1,045.
Power produced: 324.25 kilowatts of DC power, total AC power 250 kilowatts
Percent of brewery energy produced by solar: 100 percent.
Why the company went solar: “It was the right thing to do,” said Highland president Leah Ashburn. “Tax credits made it possible to do it.”

Appalachian Mountain Brewery, Boone

Solar panels: 20
Power produced: About 6,700 kilowatts annually.
Percent of brewery energy produced by solar: Almost all the brewery’s needs.
Why the company went solar: “It offsets our carbon footprint.” said brewery CEO Sean Spiegelman. “Anything we can do” to protect the environment, “we make sure to do it.”

Innovation Brewing, Sylva
Solar panels: 100
Power produced: 28.5 kilowatts
Percent of brewery energy produced by solar: About 50 percent.
Why the company went solar: “I went to school to study environmental science,” said brewery co-founder Nicole Dexter. “We want to grow and we want to operate with sustainable” energy”.

Sierra Nevada Brewing, Mills River
Solar panels: 2,198
Power produced: 710 kilowatts or enough to switch on 11,860 light bulbs.
Percent of brewery energy produced by solar: Not yet measured.
Why the company went solar: “It’s been a big deal for us since the beginning of Sierra Nevada,” said company spokesman Bill Manley. “We have long had an eye on sustainable energy.”

Source: www.citizen-times.com

EBRD boosts steel dust recycling in Turkey

Photo: EBRD
Photo: EBRD

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is promoting industrial waste recycling in Turkey with a US$ 20 million loan to Befesa Silvermet İskenderun Çelik Tozu Geri Dönüşümü A.Ş., a company which operates a steel dust recycling plant in the south-eastern city of Iskenderun.

At the plant the company is extracting zinc from electric arc furnace dust, a hazardous waste generated by steel producers that needs to be recycled or disposed of in specialised landfills. The company uses highly efficient Waelz technology to transform electric arc furnace dust into secondary zinc, also known as Waelz oxide (WOX).

The final product is then sold to the world’s leading zinc smelters, shifting the zinc industry from mining to recycling. The EBRD’s financing will double the plant’s capacity for electric arc furnace dust treatment to 110,000 tonnes per year. The investment supports a profitable solution for recycling zinc from steel dust instead of producing it from limited natural resources. It also helps reduce the amount of hazardous waste sent to landfills in one of the three main steel-making regions of Turkey.

Turkey is the eighth-largest steel producer in the world and the fifth-largest producer of electric arc furnace dust. Frederic Lucenet, EBRD Director for Manufacturing and Services, said: “By producing from industrial waste a high-value product for which there is worldwide demand, Befesa Silvermet is transforming trash into treasure.

“The EBRD is pleased to be financing this exemplary solution as part of its efforts to advance sustainable waste management and promote a circular economy in Turkey and elsewhere. “The Iskenderun plant has the potential to become a showcase for exporting the company’s recycling model to other steel-making countries where the EBRD invests.”

Befesa Silvermet İskenderun is owned by a joint venture between Spain’s Befesa Zinc S.A.U., a leading recycler of steel waste in Europe, and Canada’s Silvermet Inc., active in steel dust recycling in Turkey. Asier Zarraonandia Ayo, Director and CEO of Befesa Zinc, said: “Coming to Turkey was our strategic decision. We see great potential, believe in the country and are happy to bring the best available steel dust recycling technology to the Turkish market.”

Stephen G. Roman, Chairman, President and CEO of Silvermet, commented: “The $25 million expansion will allow us to double recycling capacity, increasing the production of zinc concentrate to over 50,000,000 pounds of contained zinc per year. The upgraded facility will use state-of-the-art environmental technology and will boost profits.”

The EBRD loan to Befesa Silvermet İskenderun is part of the Bank’s new Green Economy Transition approach, which will increase the level of EBRD financing in the sphere of sustainable resources to some €18 billion over the next five years. The EBRD started investing in Turkey in 2009 and currently operates from offices in Istanbul, Ankara and Gaziantep.

To date, the EBRD has invested over €6.8 billion in Turkey through 170 projects in infrastructure, energy, agribusiness, industry and finance. It has also mobilised about €16 billion for these ventures from other sources of financing. In 2015 the EBRD expects to invest over €1.7 billion in Turkey, its top financing destination.

Vesna Vukajlović

Source: www.ebrd.com

Global coal demand stalls after more than a decade of relentless growth

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Following more than a decade of aggressive growth, global coal demand has stalled, the International Energy Agency said Friday in its annual coal market report. The report sharply lowered its five-year global coal demand growth forecast in reflection of economic restructuring in China, which represents half of global coal consumption. Greater policy support for renewable energy and energy efficiency – the foundation of the COP21 agreement in Paris – is also expected to dent coal demand.

The IEA’s Medium-Term Coal Market Report 2015 slashed its five-year estimate of global coal demand growth by more than 500 million tones of coal equivalent (Mtce) in recognition of the tremendous pressures facing coal markets. The revision comes as official preliminary data indicate that a decline in Chinese coal demand occurred in 2014 and is set to accelerate in 2015. A decline in coal consumption in China for two consecutive years would be the first since 1982.

“The coal industry is facing huge pressures, and the main reason is China – but it is not the only reason,” IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said as he launched the report in Singapore at an event organized by the Energy Market Authority. “The economic transformation in China and environmental policies worldwide – including the recent climate agreement in Paris – will likely continue to constrain global coal demand.”

Coal demand in China is sputtering as the Chinese economy gradually shifts to one based more on services and less on energy-intensive industries. New Chinese hydro, nuclear, wind and solar are also significantly curtailing coal power generation, driven not only by energy security and climate concerns but also by efforts to reduce local pollution.

Given the strong rebalancing of China’s economy, the report also presents an alternate scenario in which Chinese coal demand has already peaked. In this so-called “peak coal scenario”, infrastructure and energy-intensive industries represent a lower share of Chinese GDP than in the report’s base case, while services and high-tech manufacturing gain momentum. In the peak case, Chinese coal demand in 2020 is 9.8% percent below the level in 2013 and more than 300 Mtce below the base-case forecast of nearly 2950 Mtce in 2020.

Meanwhile, global coal demand in the peak case drops to around 5500 Mtce in 2020 – falling 0.1% per year on average, compared with growth of 0.8% per year in the report’s main forecast.  The report sees coal demand outside China modestly increasing through 2020 as the structural decline in Europe and the United States is more than offset by growth in India and Southeast Asia. The Indian government’s push for universal energy access and an expansion of manufacturing will drive electricity growth. In addition to India’s ambitious renewable targets (175 GW of renewables by 2022, of which 100 GW are solar PV), coal will provide a significant share of the additional power requirements – as much as 60% through 2020. Indeed, preliminary data show India overtaking China as the world’s largest coal importer this year.

The region with the highest growth rate in coal use in the outlook period is in Southeast Asia, where Indonesia, Viet Nam, Malaysia and Philippines among others plan to underpin their power generation with new coal power plants. Unfortunately, around half of the new coal-fired generation capacity under development in the region still uses inefficient subcritical technologies.

Slowing economic growth and energy consumption in China as well as the restriction of coal use in its coastal regions will impact seaborne trade, especially Indonesian exports. In the IEA report’s forecast, Australia takes a growing share of seaborne coal trade.

Prices continue to remain at low levels. In December 2015, prices of imported coal in Europe fell below USD 50/tone – levels not seen in a decade. Persistent oversupply and shrinking imports in China and elsewhere suggest prices will remain under pressure through 2020.

With the recent COP21 agreement in Paris calling for the global increase in temperatures to be limited to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius, the IEA reiterated that carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology will be essential for enabling future use of coal without large CO2 emissions. “Governments and industry must increase their focus on this technology if they are serious about long-term climate goals,” said Fatih Birol. “CCS is not just a coal technology. It is not a technology just for power generation. It is an emissions reduction technology that will need to be widely deployed to achieve our low-carbon future.”

Source: www.iea.org

World’s Most Comprehensive Study Shows More Plastic in Our Oceans Than Scientists Thought

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

The 5 Gyres Institute co-authored this study which is the most comprehensive estimate of small plastics in the world’s oceans. There were two other papers published earlier, one by Cozar (2014) and Eriksen (2014) using separate data sets.

The paper published last week in Environmental Research Letters, A Global Inventory of Small Floating Plastic Debris, uses three ocean models and every dataset published since the 1970s. With 10 authors contributing to it, it’s the best so far. This new study suggests there are 15 to 51 trillion microplastic particles in the world’s oceans, weighing somewhere between 93 and 236,000 metric tons. This is roughly seven times more than what we thought before.

oceansmogWhy is it more? It has more data and more recent data. It combines the efforts of three different ocean models, so the resolution is a lot better. There’s also a lot more plastic in the ocean. Consider that in 2013 the plastics industry reported 300 million metric tons of new plastic produced in that year and a lot of it used for single-use throw away products sent to countries that have poor waste management. That combo is a recipe for trashed seas.
What is the end game for all of the plastic out there? Research shows that if we can turn off the tap, most of it will sink or wash ashore. The ocean is very dynamic and turbulent, constantly throwing things out, tearing it apart and sinking it. Humanity will have to live with this geologic layer on the ocean floor and beaches worldwide. Call it the Plasticene. Plastic is the index fossil that marks in geologic time that humans were here.

What can we do about it? We’ve got to turn off the tap using two big ideas.

1. Waste management around the world must improve and that means getting away from burning and burying our waste. Diverging waste to responsible management schemes, like compost facilities and recovery and recycling, must improve.

2. Product design is a mandatory part of the solution. The single use throwaway product concept is trashing our oceans. No waste management scheme is going to effectively clean up the proliferation of poorly designed products and packaging, like plastic bags, plastic straws, microbeads, water bottles, etc.

These two solutions—waste management and product design—must happen simultaneously. We cannot expect countries to take out huge loans to pay to improve their waste management. It would be grossly unfair to create that economic burden, while the poorly designed products and packaging continue to trash our land and sea. We need the plastics industries that make and manufacture single-use throw away products to step up and design for a better future.

 

Source: www.ecowatch.com

Photo: www.5gyres.org

 

Vattenfall partners up with AMF in wind farm agreement

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Vattenfall has signed a GBP 237 million (approx. SEK 3 billion) deal to partner-up with leading Swedish pension group AMF on an UK off shore wind farm. Vattenfall’s partnership strategy aims at supporting wind growth and the shift to renewables.

The partnership agreement means that AMF will take a 49% share in Vattenfall’s 150 MW Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm for GBP 237 million, approximately SEK 3 billion. Vattenfall will continue to operate the wind farm as majority shareholder.

“The market has shown a considerable interest in Ormonde. The main reason is that the wind farm is profitable and considered to have good prospects for stable and continuous profitability. Our partner AMF is a serious and long-term investor. We are therefore very pleased with completion of this deal,” says Magnus Hall, President and CEO of Vattenfall.

“AMF manages the pension funds of four million customers, meaning the responsibility to create good and secure pensions through long-term investments. The Ormonde wind farm investment being sustainable with good returns fits us therefore very well. Conditions for off shore wind power in the UK are favourable and in combinations with the partnership and deep knowledge in the wind area of Vattenfall we feel confident about doing this investment,” says Peder Hasslev, Head of Asset Management of AMF.

Vattenfall announced the partnering strategy in 2014 to raise funds to support growth in its renewable business. Vattenfall currently plans to invest approximately SEK 50 billion in new wind power generation by 2020 and to triple wind capacity to at least 6GW in the next ten years.

“Our partnering strategy is now paying off and delivering additional funds to fulfill our ambitious growth targets within the wind area, thereby supporting Vattenfall’s overall strategy to transform our production portfolio towards renewables. We are really pleased to have established a partnership with AMF and look forward to building a strong relationship going forward,” says Gunnar Groebler, Senior Vice President, Business Area Wind.

Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm is a 30 turbine, 150 MW, site located in the Irish Sea, 10 km off Barrow-in-Furness in North West England. Ormonde has been generating low carbon power since 2012. Ormonde is one of four offshore wind farms that Vattenfall operates in the UK.

www.vattenfall.net

Photo: energypress.net

Energy Savings Week: How Lighting Standards Are Saving You Money

sijalicaIf your family is home for the holidays, chances are the lights will end up staying on a little longer than usual. Those late night discussions and friendly family board games often require extra light to keep the action going. The good news is—even with that extra light—your energy bill can still be reasonable, thanks to efficiency standards the Energy Department has implemented for light bulbs.
Common light bulbs now sold in the United States typically use about 25%-80% less energy than traditional incandescents. Many bulbs meet these new standards, including halogen incandescents, compact fluorescents (CFLs), and light emitting diodes (LEDs). These new, energy-saving light bulbs could save you about $50 per year when you replace 15 traditional incandescent bulbs in your home. The new bulbs also provide a wide range of choices in color and brightness, and many of them last much longer than traditional light bulbs.

 
The lighting standards, which phased in from 2012-2014 and were established by the bipartisan Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), don’t ban incandescent or any specific bulb type; instead, they state that bulbs need to use about 25% less energy. Lighting standards in place today are projected to save U.S. households almost $7 billion in 2015 alone.

 
Consumers who switch to the energy-saving bulbs will immediately spend less money on their monthly energy bills for the same amount of light. While the initial price of the newer light bulbs could be higher than the inefficient incandescent bulbs you might be replacing, you’ll spend less each year to operate them. Most CFLs pay for themselves with the energy they save in less than 9 months. And if you’re looking for the most efficient option on the market, check out LEDs, which are rapidly falling in price (from $40 in 2011 to as little as $3 in 2015), and use at least 75% less energy and last 25 times longer than incandescent lighting.

 
When looking to lower your energy bills, replacing the old light bulbs in your house can be one of the best and easiest places to start.

 

Source: www.energy.gov

The Dimming of Diesel Fuel’s Future in Cars

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Diesel automobiles, which are more fuel-efficient than their gasoline-powered counterparts, were always supposed to shield their owners from some of the impact of oil-price spikes.

All told, roughly 20 percent of new cars sold around the world are diesel-powered. Diesel accounts for about half of new passenger vehicles sold in Europe and India, according to the International Council on Clean Transportation. It reaches double-digit penetration rates in a small number of other major markets, such as Australia and South Korea, but barely more than 1 or 2 percent in the United States, China and Japan.

But in fact emissions were always the real issue with diesel. Progress has been made in reducing the sulfur content of diesel fuel, the chief culprit in soot emissions. But the higher compression of diesel engines and the less refined nature of the fuel, compared to gasoline, ensure that diesel cars produce more of several pollutants, including nitrogen compounds, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide and dioxide.

The emissions issue was brought to the fore when Volkswagen, Europe’s largest carmaker and No.2 in the world (after Toyota), acknowledged in September that it had fiddled with 11 million of its diesel-powered cars to make them appear to meet emissions standards. Subsequent press reports indicated that diesel cars produced by other companies violated European emissions targets, but this was generally attributed to the way tests are conducted — the cars generate fewer emissions in the lab than on the road — and not to wrongdoing.
To compensate for the pollution levels, diesel emission-control systems are more complex and costly. It is thought that Volkswagen manipulated the software in its cars to show false readings because a pollution-control system able to meet American emissions requirements, which are stricter than Europe’s, would have been prohibitively expensive. Apart from the dishonesty, the scandal suggests that diesel technology is less clean and less cost-effective than advocates assert. Even before the story broke, diesel had several factors going against it, including declining crude-oil prices, improvements in gasoline engines and technologies that produce cleaner cars.

“Diesel probably doesn’t make sense for light-duty vehicles,” said Daniel Sperling, a professor of civil engineering and environmental science and policy at the University of California’s Davis campus and director of the Institute of Transportation Studies there. Other types of cars “are more efficient,” he said. “Emission standards are getting tighter and tighter, and as the shift takes place to electric, diesel does not have a promising long-term future” in passenger cars.
David Keith, assistant professor of system dynamics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, offered a similar prognosis. “There’s a strong headwind for diesel in the passenger-vehicle market,” he said. “Emission regulations support alternatives.” All things considered, the costs of diesel and gasoline cars are comparable. Because they have to run hotter, diesel engines must be built sturdier. Between the engines and emission-control systems, the cars are pricier, but they tend to stay on the road longer.
Diesel cars have been popular in Europe because diesel fuel is subsidized there and because emission standards are lower than for gas-powered cars. Regulators in the United States require both types to meet the same standards, which raises costs for diesel cars made for the American market, said Mr. Sperling, who also serves on the California Air Resources Board. But Europe is introducing tougher emissions standards, which could require more expensive control systems in diesel cars. And after the Volkswagen affair, testing is likely to get tougher, too, said Colin Langan, who follows the auto industry for the Swiss bank UBS.
At the same time, improvements to gas engines could make them more appealing. “In Europe, a lot of people have assumed that diesel was going to lose momentum,” Mr. Langan said. “Gas engines are getting a lot better; they’re getting turbochargers, which diesel engines already have. People are going to start migrating more to gas from diesel.”
He added, however, that Europe has also set tougher fuel-economy targets for carmakers. Diesel still has an edge there, which may slow the shift to gas.
Gasoline-powered cars are not the only ones that makers of diesel cars have to worry about. Coming up in the fast lane, even if there’s little traffic there now, are hybrid and electric vehicles.
Mr. Langan sees little threat from the cleaner alternatives just yet, however, because they are more expensive than gas or diesel models. Electric works at the upscale, high-performance end of the market, where manufacturers like Tesla live, but not in the mainstream.
Alan Baum, principal of Baum and Associates, an automotive consulting firm in Michigan, is more hopeful.
“Costs are coming down and the technology is improving” amid “an all-hands-on-deck strategy among regulators and automakers,” Mr. Baum said. Internal-combustion vehicles are less expensive than electric and hybrid equivalents today, but he wonders what the cost might be “when you have to have a car that gets 30 miles per gallon or, in 10 years, 40?”
As a result of the various threats to its position in the marketplace — both external and self-inflicted — diesel’s proportion of the world’s fleet of passenger cars is likely to shrink into the teens in the next decade, Mr. Baum forecast. Mr. Keith at M.I.T. similarly highlighted “the great scope for innovation to introduce electric-drive technology that promises to be cleaner.” “I don’t think diesel’s going to go away completely,” he added. “I think there’s a role for all these technologies, but definitely in the U.S. and increasingly in Europe, we can see challenges in getting diesel to perform at a level we like.”

 

The New York Times
By: Conrad de Aenlle

 

Unlocking Climate Finance For More Renewable Energy in South Asia

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

With only 43% of its households with access to electricity, Odisha’s economic development lags behind that of other states in India. However, it is home to rich water reserves, wildlife, forest, minerals, and renewable energy sources, which together can help boost the state’s economy.

Let’s take the example of solar energy. In recent years, Odisha and its international partners have set out to boost the evelopment of renewable energy in the state and now aim to identify and scale up potential solar power sites. Yet, challenges remain. Despite 300 clear sunny days every year representing a huge solar potential (Odisha receives an average solar radiation of 5.5 kWh/ Sq. m area), only 1.29 percent of Odisha’s total energy capacity stems from renewable sources. Considering that Odisha is planning to increase its solar capacity from 31.5 Megawatts (MW) to 2,300 MW in the next five years, the state must step up its efforts and enact relevant policies to meet its solar energy goals.

This, in turn, could benefit local businesses and spur economic growth. Indeed, climate finance provides another window to mobilize potential investment to scale up the development of renewable energy while addressing global issues such as climate change.

India submitted their Intended Nationally determined Contribution (INDCs) prior to the Paris Climate Change Conference (COP 21). This document highlights the need for capacity building and financing to implement the country’s climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy. India aims to achieve an additional 175 Gigawatts (GW) capacity in renewable energy within a few years, of which 100 GW are to be generated from solar power. This target will require tremendous investments in the next decade. Moreover, it is expected that $17 billion in investment will be required annually for solar power alone, up from the current $6 billion annual investment in the entire renewable energy sector in India.

Climate finance could fill some financing gaps to realize such wide-ranging investment in the sector. Further south in Sri Lanka, the Sri Lanka Climate Fund is part of the country’s national strategy to channel international climate finance and support additional private sector participation to spur renewable energy development. The country is trying to lure the international community into scaling up investment in climate finance in order to meet its 20 percent renewable energy target.

Expecting some outcome from the Paris Climate Change Conference, the World Bank Group already announced it will increase its financing with climate co-benefits up to $29 billion a year by 2020, with the support of its members. We know that this engagement will require a lot of efforts to become a reality, but we also know that it will help achieve our goals: Ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity.

Our initiatives with the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility in both the state of Odisha in India and Sri Lanka are just some of the examples of how we intend to move in that direction.

Source: The World Bank

Darwin Shopping Centre Takes “Largest Solar System” Mantle

Photo: blog.gpt.com.au

The largest rooftop solar power system in Australia is now in Darwin. The installation the 1.25-megawatt solar system at GPT Group’s Casuarina Square, the largest shopping centre in the Northern Territory, reached practical completion last week.

The 4190 solar panel rooftop has enough output to power 310 average Australian households and reduce greenhouse pollution by more than 1300 tonnes of CO₂ per annum, according to GPT. “Solar is playing a key part in GPT’s strategy to move all of the base buildings it manages towards carbon neutrality,” GPT’s national manager sustainability Bruce Precious said.
“GPT is reviewing all of its buildings with large rooftop areas across Australia to assess whether they are suited to solar systems. In addition to Casuarina Square, we have large solar installations in several of our assets including 3 and 5 Murray Rose at Sydney Olympic Park and Rouse Hill Town Centre.” The system, with an estimated annual output of 2030 MWh (megawatt hours), has already started providing around 20 per cent of Casuarina Square’s base building and common area electricity needs. The solar installation has also been granted approval to connect to the electricity distribution network that provides power to residents and businesses in the Northern Territory.

Having spread across the roofs of more than 1.4 million homes, many businesses are now jumping on the solar bandwagon. Casuarina Square follows Stockland’s massive solar project at its Shellharbour shopping centre. The property group’s solar installation is 1.22 megawatts. “Stockland is proud to be leading the sector in sustainability and investment in renewable energy, and it’s great to hear that others in the industry are following our lead,” Daniel Buchanan, regional retail manager at Stockland said. “We’re already planning more new solar power generation installations across our portfolio to increase our use of renewable energy.”
IKEA, the world’s biggest furniture retailer, is another company taking big steps in renewable energy. The company wants to be energy carbon-neutral by 2020, with 100 per cent of its energy needs coming from renewable sources. Last year IKEA’s Australian businesses installed 16,000 solar panels on the roofs of its six stores, including almost 4000 panels at its flagship Tempe store near Sydney airport.

Other companies such as Coles, Telstra, Google and Australia Post are also going solar. Investment bank UBS said in a report in September that large-scale solar looks set to usurp wind power from its long-held position as the cheapest new renewable energy source in just a few years. The global utilities research team believes solar power could account for a quarter of the world’s installed power generation capacity by 2050.
Source: Financial Review

Uruguay makes dramatic shift to nearly 95% of electricity from clean energy

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

In less than 10 years the country has slashed its carbon footprint and lowered electricity costs, without government subsidies. Delegates at the Paris summit can learn much from its success. Renewables now provide 94.5% of Uruguay’s electricity. As the world gathers in Paris for the daunting task of switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy, one small country on the other side of the Atlantic is making that transition look childishly simple and affordable. In less than 10 years, Uruguay has slashed its carbon footprint without government subsidies or higher consumer costs, according to the country’s head of climate change policy, Ramón Méndez.

In fact, he says that now that renewables provide 94.5% of the country’s electricity, prices are lower than in the past relative to inflation. There are also fewer power cuts because a diverse energy mix means greater resilience to droughts. It was a very different story just 15 years ago. Back at the turn of the century oil accounted for 27% of Uruguay’s imports and a new pipeline was just about to begin supplying gas from Argentina.

Now the biggest item on import balance sheet is wind turbines, which fill the country’s ports on their way to installation. Biomass and solar power have also been ramped up. Adding to existing hydropower, this means that renewables now account for 55% of the country’s overall energy mix (including transport fuel) compared with a global average share of 12%. Now, Uruguay is being recognised for progress on decarbonising its economy. It has been praised by the World Bank and the Economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, and the WWF last year named Uruguay among its “Green Energy Leaders”, proclaiming: “The country is defining global trends in renewable energy investment.”

Cementing that reputation, Méndez – formerly the country’s national director of energy – has gone to this week’s UN talks with one of the world’s most ambitious national pledges: an 88% cut in carbon emissions by 2017 compared with the average for 2009-13.There are no technological miracles involved, nuclear power is entirely absent from the mix, and no new hydroelectric power has been added for more than two decades. Instead, he says, the key to success is rather dull but encouragingly replicable: clear decision-making, a supportive regulatory environment and a strong partnership between the public and private sector. As a result, energy investment – mostly for renewables, but also liquid gas – in Uruguay over the past five years has surged to $7bn, or 15% of the country’s annual GDP. That is five times the average in Latin America and three times the global share recommended by climate economist Nicholas Stern.

“What we’ve learned is that renewables is just a financial business,” Méndez says. “The construction and maintenance costs are low, so as long as you give investors a secure environment, it is a very attractive.”The effects are apparent on Route 5 from Montevideo to the north. In less than 200 miles, you pass three agroindustrial plants running on biofuel and three wind farms. The biggest of them is the 115MW Peralta plant built and run by the German company, Enercon. Its huge turbines – each 108 meters tall – tower over grasslands full of cattle and rhea birds.Along with reliable wind – at an average of about 8mph – the main attraction for foreign investors like Enercon is a fixed price for 20 years that is guaranteed by the state utility. Because maintenance costs are low (just 10 staff) and stable, this guarantees a profit. As a result, foreign firms are lining up to secure wind farm contracts.

The competition is pushing down bids, cutting electricity generating costs by more than 30% over the past three years. Christian Schaefer, supervising technician at Enercon said his company was hoping to expand and another German company Nordex is already building an even bigger plant further north along route five. Trucks carrying turbines, towers and blades are now a common sight on the country’s roads. Compared to most other small countries with high proportions of renewables, the mix is diverse. While Paraguay, Bhutan and Lesotho rely almost solely on hydro and Iceland on geothermal, Uruguay has a spread that makes it more resilient to changes in the climate. Wind farms such as Peralta now feed into hydro power plants so that dams can maintain their reservoirs longer after rainy seasons.

According to Méndez, this has reduced vulnerability to drought by 70% – no small benefit considering a dry year used to cost the country nearly 2% of GDP. This is not the only benefit for the economy. “For three years we haven’t imported a single kilowatt hour,” Méndez says. “We used to be reliant on electricity imports from Argentina, but now we export to them. Last summer, we sold a third of our power generation to them.”There is still a lot to do. The transport sector still depends on oil (which accounts for 45% of the total energy mix). But industry – mostly agricultural processing – is now powered predominantly by biomass cogeneration plants.

Méndez attributed Uruguay’s success to three key factors: credibility (a stable democracy that has never defaulted on its debts so it is attractive for long-term investments); helpful natural conditions (good wind, decent solar radiation and lots of biomass from agriculture); and strong public companies (which are a reliable partner for private firms and can work with the state to create an attractive operating environment).While not every country in the world can replicate this model, he said Uruguay had proved that renewables can reduce generation costs, can meet well over 90% of electricity demand without the back-up of coal or nuclear power plants, and the public and private sectors can work together effectively in this field.

• This article was amended on 4 December 2015. An earlier version described Ramón Méndez as Uruguay’s national director of energy; he was formerly, but Olga Otegui now holds that post.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Small nations, renewable giants

Photo: Pixabay

Uruguay gets 94.5% of its electricity from renewables. In addition to old hydropower plants, a hefty investment in wind, biomass and solar in recent years has raised the share of these sources in the total energy mix to 55%, compared with a global average of 12%, and about 20% in Europe.

Costa Rica went a record 94 consecutive days earlier this year without using fossil fuel for electricity, thanks to a mix of about 78% hydropower, 12% geothermal and 10% wind. The government has set a target of 100% renewable energy by 2021. But transport remains dirty.

Iceland has the advantage of being a nation of volcanoes, which has allowed it to tap geothermal sources of 85% of its heating and – with the assistance of hydropower – 100% of its electricity. This has made it the world’s largest green energy producer per capita.

Paraguay has one huge hydropower dam at Itaipu, which supplies 90% of the country’s electricity.

Lesotho gets 100% of its electricity from a cascade of dams that have enough spare capacity to export power to South Africa.

Bhutan’s abundant hydropower resources generate a surplus of electricity that accounts for more than 40% of the country’s export earnings. But over-reliance on one source can be a problem. In the dry season, it has to import power from India.

Source: www.theguardian.com