Home Blog Page 385

Vattenfall partners up with AMF in wind farm agreement

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Vattenfall has signed a GBP 237 million (approx. SEK 3 billion) deal to partner-up with leading Swedish pension group AMF on an UK off shore wind farm. Vattenfall’s partnership strategy aims at supporting wind growth and the shift to renewables.

The partnership agreement means that AMF will take a 49% share in Vattenfall’s 150 MW Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm for GBP 237 million, approximately SEK 3 billion. Vattenfall will continue to operate the wind farm as majority shareholder.

“The market has shown a considerable interest in Ormonde. The main reason is that the wind farm is profitable and considered to have good prospects for stable and continuous profitability. Our partner AMF is a serious and long-term investor. We are therefore very pleased with completion of this deal,” says Magnus Hall, President and CEO of Vattenfall.

“AMF manages the pension funds of four million customers, meaning the responsibility to create good and secure pensions through long-term investments. The Ormonde wind farm investment being sustainable with good returns fits us therefore very well. Conditions for off shore wind power in the UK are favourable and in combinations with the partnership and deep knowledge in the wind area of Vattenfall we feel confident about doing this investment,” says Peder Hasslev, Head of Asset Management of AMF.

Vattenfall announced the partnering strategy in 2014 to raise funds to support growth in its renewable business. Vattenfall currently plans to invest approximately SEK 50 billion in new wind power generation by 2020 and to triple wind capacity to at least 6GW in the next ten years.

“Our partnering strategy is now paying off and delivering additional funds to fulfill our ambitious growth targets within the wind area, thereby supporting Vattenfall’s overall strategy to transform our production portfolio towards renewables. We are really pleased to have established a partnership with AMF and look forward to building a strong relationship going forward,” says Gunnar Groebler, Senior Vice President, Business Area Wind.

Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm is a 30 turbine, 150 MW, site located in the Irish Sea, 10 km off Barrow-in-Furness in North West England. Ormonde has been generating low carbon power since 2012. Ormonde is one of four offshore wind farms that Vattenfall operates in the UK.

www.vattenfall.net

Photo: energypress.net

Energy Savings Week: How Lighting Standards Are Saving You Money

sijalicaIf your family is home for the holidays, chances are the lights will end up staying on a little longer than usual. Those late night discussions and friendly family board games often require extra light to keep the action going. The good news is—even with that extra light—your energy bill can still be reasonable, thanks to efficiency standards the Energy Department has implemented for light bulbs.
Common light bulbs now sold in the United States typically use about 25%-80% less energy than traditional incandescents. Many bulbs meet these new standards, including halogen incandescents, compact fluorescents (CFLs), and light emitting diodes (LEDs). These new, energy-saving light bulbs could save you about $50 per year when you replace 15 traditional incandescent bulbs in your home. The new bulbs also provide a wide range of choices in color and brightness, and many of them last much longer than traditional light bulbs.

 
The lighting standards, which phased in from 2012-2014 and were established by the bipartisan Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), don’t ban incandescent or any specific bulb type; instead, they state that bulbs need to use about 25% less energy. Lighting standards in place today are projected to save U.S. households almost $7 billion in 2015 alone.

 
Consumers who switch to the energy-saving bulbs will immediately spend less money on their monthly energy bills for the same amount of light. While the initial price of the newer light bulbs could be higher than the inefficient incandescent bulbs you might be replacing, you’ll spend less each year to operate them. Most CFLs pay for themselves with the energy they save in less than 9 months. And if you’re looking for the most efficient option on the market, check out LEDs, which are rapidly falling in price (from $40 in 2011 to as little as $3 in 2015), and use at least 75% less energy and last 25 times longer than incandescent lighting.

 
When looking to lower your energy bills, replacing the old light bulbs in your house can be one of the best and easiest places to start.

 

Source: www.energy.gov

The Dimming of Diesel Fuel’s Future in Cars

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Diesel automobiles, which are more fuel-efficient than their gasoline-powered counterparts, were always supposed to shield their owners from some of the impact of oil-price spikes.

All told, roughly 20 percent of new cars sold around the world are diesel-powered. Diesel accounts for about half of new passenger vehicles sold in Europe and India, according to the International Council on Clean Transportation. It reaches double-digit penetration rates in a small number of other major markets, such as Australia and South Korea, but barely more than 1 or 2 percent in the United States, China and Japan.

But in fact emissions were always the real issue with diesel. Progress has been made in reducing the sulfur content of diesel fuel, the chief culprit in soot emissions. But the higher compression of diesel engines and the less refined nature of the fuel, compared to gasoline, ensure that diesel cars produce more of several pollutants, including nitrogen compounds, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide and dioxide.

The emissions issue was brought to the fore when Volkswagen, Europe’s largest carmaker and No.2 in the world (after Toyota), acknowledged in September that it had fiddled with 11 million of its diesel-powered cars to make them appear to meet emissions standards. Subsequent press reports indicated that diesel cars produced by other companies violated European emissions targets, but this was generally attributed to the way tests are conducted — the cars generate fewer emissions in the lab than on the road — and not to wrongdoing.
To compensate for the pollution levels, diesel emission-control systems are more complex and costly. It is thought that Volkswagen manipulated the software in its cars to show false readings because a pollution-control system able to meet American emissions requirements, which are stricter than Europe’s, would have been prohibitively expensive. Apart from the dishonesty, the scandal suggests that diesel technology is less clean and less cost-effective than advocates assert. Even before the story broke, diesel had several factors going against it, including declining crude-oil prices, improvements in gasoline engines and technologies that produce cleaner cars.

“Diesel probably doesn’t make sense for light-duty vehicles,” said Daniel Sperling, a professor of civil engineering and environmental science and policy at the University of California’s Davis campus and director of the Institute of Transportation Studies there. Other types of cars “are more efficient,” he said. “Emission standards are getting tighter and tighter, and as the shift takes place to electric, diesel does not have a promising long-term future” in passenger cars.
David Keith, assistant professor of system dynamics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, offered a similar prognosis. “There’s a strong headwind for diesel in the passenger-vehicle market,” he said. “Emission regulations support alternatives.” All things considered, the costs of diesel and gasoline cars are comparable. Because they have to run hotter, diesel engines must be built sturdier. Between the engines and emission-control systems, the cars are pricier, but they tend to stay on the road longer.
Diesel cars have been popular in Europe because diesel fuel is subsidized there and because emission standards are lower than for gas-powered cars. Regulators in the United States require both types to meet the same standards, which raises costs for diesel cars made for the American market, said Mr. Sperling, who also serves on the California Air Resources Board. But Europe is introducing tougher emissions standards, which could require more expensive control systems in diesel cars. And after the Volkswagen affair, testing is likely to get tougher, too, said Colin Langan, who follows the auto industry for the Swiss bank UBS.
At the same time, improvements to gas engines could make them more appealing. “In Europe, a lot of people have assumed that diesel was going to lose momentum,” Mr. Langan said. “Gas engines are getting a lot better; they’re getting turbochargers, which diesel engines already have. People are going to start migrating more to gas from diesel.”
He added, however, that Europe has also set tougher fuel-economy targets for carmakers. Diesel still has an edge there, which may slow the shift to gas.
Gasoline-powered cars are not the only ones that makers of diesel cars have to worry about. Coming up in the fast lane, even if there’s little traffic there now, are hybrid and electric vehicles.
Mr. Langan sees little threat from the cleaner alternatives just yet, however, because they are more expensive than gas or diesel models. Electric works at the upscale, high-performance end of the market, where manufacturers like Tesla live, but not in the mainstream.
Alan Baum, principal of Baum and Associates, an automotive consulting firm in Michigan, is more hopeful.
“Costs are coming down and the technology is improving” amid “an all-hands-on-deck strategy among regulators and automakers,” Mr. Baum said. Internal-combustion vehicles are less expensive than electric and hybrid equivalents today, but he wonders what the cost might be “when you have to have a car that gets 30 miles per gallon or, in 10 years, 40?”
As a result of the various threats to its position in the marketplace — both external and self-inflicted — diesel’s proportion of the world’s fleet of passenger cars is likely to shrink into the teens in the next decade, Mr. Baum forecast. Mr. Keith at M.I.T. similarly highlighted “the great scope for innovation to introduce electric-drive technology that promises to be cleaner.” “I don’t think diesel’s going to go away completely,” he added. “I think there’s a role for all these technologies, but definitely in the U.S. and increasingly in Europe, we can see challenges in getting diesel to perform at a level we like.”

 

The New York Times
By: Conrad de Aenlle

 

Unlocking Climate Finance For More Renewable Energy in South Asia

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

With only 43% of its households with access to electricity, Odisha’s economic development lags behind that of other states in India. However, it is home to rich water reserves, wildlife, forest, minerals, and renewable energy sources, which together can help boost the state’s economy.

Let’s take the example of solar energy. In recent years, Odisha and its international partners have set out to boost the evelopment of renewable energy in the state and now aim to identify and scale up potential solar power sites. Yet, challenges remain. Despite 300 clear sunny days every year representing a huge solar potential (Odisha receives an average solar radiation of 5.5 kWh/ Sq. m area), only 1.29 percent of Odisha’s total energy capacity stems from renewable sources. Considering that Odisha is planning to increase its solar capacity from 31.5 Megawatts (MW) to 2,300 MW in the next five years, the state must step up its efforts and enact relevant policies to meet its solar energy goals.

This, in turn, could benefit local businesses and spur economic growth. Indeed, climate finance provides another window to mobilize potential investment to scale up the development of renewable energy while addressing global issues such as climate change.

India submitted their Intended Nationally determined Contribution (INDCs) prior to the Paris Climate Change Conference (COP 21). This document highlights the need for capacity building and financing to implement the country’s climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy. India aims to achieve an additional 175 Gigawatts (GW) capacity in renewable energy within a few years, of which 100 GW are to be generated from solar power. This target will require tremendous investments in the next decade. Moreover, it is expected that $17 billion in investment will be required annually for solar power alone, up from the current $6 billion annual investment in the entire renewable energy sector in India.

Climate finance could fill some financing gaps to realize such wide-ranging investment in the sector. Further south in Sri Lanka, the Sri Lanka Climate Fund is part of the country’s national strategy to channel international climate finance and support additional private sector participation to spur renewable energy development. The country is trying to lure the international community into scaling up investment in climate finance in order to meet its 20 percent renewable energy target.

Expecting some outcome from the Paris Climate Change Conference, the World Bank Group already announced it will increase its financing with climate co-benefits up to $29 billion a year by 2020, with the support of its members. We know that this engagement will require a lot of efforts to become a reality, but we also know that it will help achieve our goals: Ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity.

Our initiatives with the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility in both the state of Odisha in India and Sri Lanka are just some of the examples of how we intend to move in that direction.

Source: The World Bank

Darwin Shopping Centre Takes “Largest Solar System” Mantle

Photo: blog.gpt.com.au

The largest rooftop solar power system in Australia is now in Darwin. The installation the 1.25-megawatt solar system at GPT Group’s Casuarina Square, the largest shopping centre in the Northern Territory, reached practical completion last week.

The 4190 solar panel rooftop has enough output to power 310 average Australian households and reduce greenhouse pollution by more than 1300 tonnes of CO₂ per annum, according to GPT. “Solar is playing a key part in GPT’s strategy to move all of the base buildings it manages towards carbon neutrality,” GPT’s national manager sustainability Bruce Precious said.
“GPT is reviewing all of its buildings with large rooftop areas across Australia to assess whether they are suited to solar systems. In addition to Casuarina Square, we have large solar installations in several of our assets including 3 and 5 Murray Rose at Sydney Olympic Park and Rouse Hill Town Centre.” The system, with an estimated annual output of 2030 MWh (megawatt hours), has already started providing around 20 per cent of Casuarina Square’s base building and common area electricity needs. The solar installation has also been granted approval to connect to the electricity distribution network that provides power to residents and businesses in the Northern Territory.

Having spread across the roofs of more than 1.4 million homes, many businesses are now jumping on the solar bandwagon. Casuarina Square follows Stockland’s massive solar project at its Shellharbour shopping centre. The property group’s solar installation is 1.22 megawatts. “Stockland is proud to be leading the sector in sustainability and investment in renewable energy, and it’s great to hear that others in the industry are following our lead,” Daniel Buchanan, regional retail manager at Stockland said. “We’re already planning more new solar power generation installations across our portfolio to increase our use of renewable energy.”
IKEA, the world’s biggest furniture retailer, is another company taking big steps in renewable energy. The company wants to be energy carbon-neutral by 2020, with 100 per cent of its energy needs coming from renewable sources. Last year IKEA’s Australian businesses installed 16,000 solar panels on the roofs of its six stores, including almost 4000 panels at its flagship Tempe store near Sydney airport.

Other companies such as Coles, Telstra, Google and Australia Post are also going solar. Investment bank UBS said in a report in September that large-scale solar looks set to usurp wind power from its long-held position as the cheapest new renewable energy source in just a few years. The global utilities research team believes solar power could account for a quarter of the world’s installed power generation capacity by 2050.
Source: Financial Review

Uruguay makes dramatic shift to nearly 95% of electricity from clean energy

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

In less than 10 years the country has slashed its carbon footprint and lowered electricity costs, without government subsidies. Delegates at the Paris summit can learn much from its success. Renewables now provide 94.5% of Uruguay’s electricity. As the world gathers in Paris for the daunting task of switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy, one small country on the other side of the Atlantic is making that transition look childishly simple and affordable. In less than 10 years, Uruguay has slashed its carbon footprint without government subsidies or higher consumer costs, according to the country’s head of climate change policy, Ramón Méndez.

In fact, he says that now that renewables provide 94.5% of the country’s electricity, prices are lower than in the past relative to inflation. There are also fewer power cuts because a diverse energy mix means greater resilience to droughts. It was a very different story just 15 years ago. Back at the turn of the century oil accounted for 27% of Uruguay’s imports and a new pipeline was just about to begin supplying gas from Argentina.

Now the biggest item on import balance sheet is wind turbines, which fill the country’s ports on their way to installation. Biomass and solar power have also been ramped up. Adding to existing hydropower, this means that renewables now account for 55% of the country’s overall energy mix (including transport fuel) compared with a global average share of 12%. Now, Uruguay is being recognised for progress on decarbonising its economy. It has been praised by the World Bank and the Economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, and the WWF last year named Uruguay among its “Green Energy Leaders”, proclaiming: “The country is defining global trends in renewable energy investment.”

Cementing that reputation, Méndez – formerly the country’s national director of energy – has gone to this week’s UN talks with one of the world’s most ambitious national pledges: an 88% cut in carbon emissions by 2017 compared with the average for 2009-13.There are no technological miracles involved, nuclear power is entirely absent from the mix, and no new hydroelectric power has been added for more than two decades. Instead, he says, the key to success is rather dull but encouragingly replicable: clear decision-making, a supportive regulatory environment and a strong partnership between the public and private sector. As a result, energy investment – mostly for renewables, but also liquid gas – in Uruguay over the past five years has surged to $7bn, or 15% of the country’s annual GDP. That is five times the average in Latin America and three times the global share recommended by climate economist Nicholas Stern.

“What we’ve learned is that renewables is just a financial business,” Méndez says. “The construction and maintenance costs are low, so as long as you give investors a secure environment, it is a very attractive.”The effects are apparent on Route 5 from Montevideo to the north. In less than 200 miles, you pass three agroindustrial plants running on biofuel and three wind farms. The biggest of them is the 115MW Peralta plant built and run by the German company, Enercon. Its huge turbines – each 108 meters tall – tower over grasslands full of cattle and rhea birds.Along with reliable wind – at an average of about 8mph – the main attraction for foreign investors like Enercon is a fixed price for 20 years that is guaranteed by the state utility. Because maintenance costs are low (just 10 staff) and stable, this guarantees a profit. As a result, foreign firms are lining up to secure wind farm contracts.

The competition is pushing down bids, cutting electricity generating costs by more than 30% over the past three years. Christian Schaefer, supervising technician at Enercon said his company was hoping to expand and another German company Nordex is already building an even bigger plant further north along route five. Trucks carrying turbines, towers and blades are now a common sight on the country’s roads. Compared to most other small countries with high proportions of renewables, the mix is diverse. While Paraguay, Bhutan and Lesotho rely almost solely on hydro and Iceland on geothermal, Uruguay has a spread that makes it more resilient to changes in the climate. Wind farms such as Peralta now feed into hydro power plants so that dams can maintain their reservoirs longer after rainy seasons.

According to Méndez, this has reduced vulnerability to drought by 70% – no small benefit considering a dry year used to cost the country nearly 2% of GDP. This is not the only benefit for the economy. “For three years we haven’t imported a single kilowatt hour,” Méndez says. “We used to be reliant on electricity imports from Argentina, but now we export to them. Last summer, we sold a third of our power generation to them.”There is still a lot to do. The transport sector still depends on oil (which accounts for 45% of the total energy mix). But industry – mostly agricultural processing – is now powered predominantly by biomass cogeneration plants.

Méndez attributed Uruguay’s success to three key factors: credibility (a stable democracy that has never defaulted on its debts so it is attractive for long-term investments); helpful natural conditions (good wind, decent solar radiation and lots of biomass from agriculture); and strong public companies (which are a reliable partner for private firms and can work with the state to create an attractive operating environment).While not every country in the world can replicate this model, he said Uruguay had proved that renewables can reduce generation costs, can meet well over 90% of electricity demand without the back-up of coal or nuclear power plants, and the public and private sectors can work together effectively in this field.

• This article was amended on 4 December 2015. An earlier version described Ramón Méndez as Uruguay’s national director of energy; he was formerly, but Olga Otegui now holds that post.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Small nations, renewable giants

Photo: Pixabay

Uruguay gets 94.5% of its electricity from renewables. In addition to old hydropower plants, a hefty investment in wind, biomass and solar in recent years has raised the share of these sources in the total energy mix to 55%, compared with a global average of 12%, and about 20% in Europe.

Costa Rica went a record 94 consecutive days earlier this year without using fossil fuel for electricity, thanks to a mix of about 78% hydropower, 12% geothermal and 10% wind. The government has set a target of 100% renewable energy by 2021. But transport remains dirty.

Iceland has the advantage of being a nation of volcanoes, which has allowed it to tap geothermal sources of 85% of its heating and – with the assistance of hydropower – 100% of its electricity. This has made it the world’s largest green energy producer per capita.

Paraguay has one huge hydropower dam at Itaipu, which supplies 90% of the country’s electricity.

Lesotho gets 100% of its electricity from a cascade of dams that have enough spare capacity to export power to South Africa.

Bhutan’s abundant hydropower resources generate a surplus of electricity that accounts for more than 40% of the country’s export earnings. But over-reliance on one source can be a problem. In the dry season, it has to import power from India.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Serbia was among the first countries to deliver its national commitments UNFCCC*

????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????
Ambassador of France in Serbia, Mrs Christen Moro

By entering the industrial era, mankind entered the era of climate change on the planet. People’s activity is directly affected by the increase in emissions of greenhouse gases, in addition there was a threat that will die 20 to 30 % of animal and plant species, the level of seas and oceans is increasing, and all this affects the new migration and far-reaching social and economic changes. Global warming is causing severe meteorological changes such as floods, drought, natural disasters, storms … All of this will be discussed at the COP21 conference about which we talk with the Ambassador of France in Serbia, Mrs Christen Moro who on behalf of the host country speaks for our special edition about organization of the conference in Paris, the significance of this event, the activities of Serbia when this topic comes and more…

EP: The Conference COP21 is the biggest diplomatic event ever, that will take place in France, and 195 countries and EU delegation are expected delegations. Do you expect that the effects of this event are grandiose like the event itself?

CHRISTEN MORO: Grandiose is not the appropriate word, we do not seek a “show off” effect but a breakthrough in negotiations which have already lasted for too long without decisive result, while the evolution of climate is rapidly deteriorating.

The negotiations in Paris have been prepared well in advance, with a close cooperation between the current presidency of the COP (Peru who presided over COP 20) and the incoming presidency, France, responsible for COP21. We have used all methodological means to make the positions converge towards our target: a universal, though differentiated, agreement, a binding agreement, a regular monitoring and upward revising mechanism.

On the way to COP21, the preparations have already produced very good and encouraging results: to date, 167 countries have submitted national commitments (“INDCs”), covering 91% of global greenhouse gas emissions by 2011. This high number is in a way a plebiscite showing that the purpose of this negotiations is understood and shared worldwide. Serbia has contributed to this successful preparation: it was among the first countries to deliver, last June, its national commitments to UNFCCC.

With the collected commitments, we are on the right track: the INDCs are already making a significant shift in trajectory even though they are not sufficient to limit the rise in average temperature below 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius – which is the target.

A good progress has been made in recent weeks, just ahead of the Conference, to find convergence in the remaining causes of dissent. The most important is that the political leaders are aware that decisions must be taken NOW, and we count on them to give the necessary impulse. The declaration of the G20 meeting in Antalya is contributing to this political impulse.

The involvement of civil society ahead of and during the Conference is also very important. In spite of the recent dramatic events in Paris we have decided to maintain the Conference itself – which will be a moment of hope and confidence in the future – including the events with civil society – as long as they take place in spaces where security can be guaranteed.

EP: France wants to play an exemplary role in this process. EU member states have committed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 40% by 2030, and France takes a step further by trying to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions by 60% until 2040. What type of resources and potentials does France need in order to implement this plan?

CHRISTEN MORO: Climate change is a priority of French government since the early 1990s. By representing only 1.2% of global emissions, while it accounts for 4.2% of global GDP (gross domestic product), France is among industrialized countries that emit less greenhouse gases. Between 2008 -2012, France has reduced by more than 10% its emissions of greenhouse gases thanks to “low carbon” technologies in the areas of transport, land use and agriculture.

Recently we have adopted the law on the energy transition, which paves the way to a more sober economy in energy consumption, while renewable energy is increasing its share in energy production. We are convinced that it is possible to develop a green economy without sacrificing growth, and avoiding huge expenses for damage caused by global warming. We plan that the energy transition will create around 100,000 new jobs in various fields including renovation of buildings, renewable energy, recycling economy, etc.

Industries and companies used to wait for incentives or coercive policies to act. Today, they show their voluntarism: they have become aware that their own economic interest is to commit themselves to low-carbon practices. And they have understood that the fight against climate change is a source innovation and competitiveness. More than 1500 French companies already published their quantified commitments to climate change.

EP: The French Embassy in Serbia is active, and has launched a series of exhibitions, debates, seminars that included the local community on the topic COP21. What are the results of these activities?

CHRISTEN MORO: Serbia has understood where its interests lie, and is aware of the constraints and damages caused by the effects of climate change: natural catastrophes such as droughts and floods, consequences of global warming on agriculture, public health … For several years France has had a good cooperation with Serbia in those fields and we understand each other. We have found in that preparation of COP21 common grounds for joint actions with the government, local authorities, schools and universities… We have also worked together with researchers and innovation stakeholders, NGOs and citizens. A broad involvement is essential, not only having COP21 in view, but more broadly having in view the period after COP21: the success of the commitments taken will not be possible without participation and support from all levels and fields within the country. The actions taken have raised the awareness of the public, who understands better what is at stake, what is the cost of inaction, what are the benefits of action and what can be done at individual and collective level.

*United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Interview by Vesna Vukajlovic

ABB presents electric bus system in Paris as COP21 climate conference gets underway

image2_rABB’s innovative electric bus charging technology was one of the highlights of the show of sustainable transport systems around the Eiffel Tower in Paris, where world leaders are meeting to seek a global agreement to tackle climate change.
Organized by RATP, the French capital’s public transport authority, the show presented solutions for the future of urban transport. The ABB system, known as TOSA (a French acronym for Transport with Optimized Power Supply System) was the only all-electric solution for an articulated bus among the vehicles on display.

ABB TOSA technology was launched in 2013 in Geneva, where it is used on a line connecting the airport with the city’s main venue for trade fairs. Designed for urban transport of high-capacity, the articulated bus can be charged in just 15 seconds while passengers alight and board at selected stops along the route, with longer top-ups at each terminus. “The tremendous interest in TOSA in Paris reflects the attractive business prospects for this solution,” said Olivier Augé, Global Product Manager for TOSA. “Public transport authorities in cities around the world are planning to switch to less polluting technologies, and many are now looking at our zero-local-emission systems as potential solutions.” In Paris, RATP aims to have 80 percent of its buses running on electricity by 2025.

A controlled moving arm on the roof of the TOSA e-bus automatically connects with a charger at selected bus stops in less than a second. This feature and the 15-second charging time minimizes time needed at the bus stop. The TOSA e-bus stores its energy in compact batteries mounted on the roof of the bus, increasing passenger space on board. The e-bus is also able to recover energy while braking to further reduce the total energy consumed by the vehicle. At 18.75 meters long, the bus has a capacity of 143 passengers.

A further advantage of the TOSA system is that, unlike trams and trolleybuses, very little infrastructure is required along the route, reducing both the visual pollution caused by catenary systems, and the required maintenance.

TOSA+e-bus

ABB’s electric bus solutions, and each addresses a different market need

ABB is a global leader in fast-charging solutions for electric vehicles. Alongside the TOSA e-bus system, it produces fast DC chargers for electric buses and its e-bus product portfolio includes drivetrain solutions (the components that deliver power from a vehicle’s engine to its driving wheels) and prefabricated e-bus substations.

Source and photo by www.abb.com

Nevena Djukić

Global concern about climate change, broad support for limiting emissions

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Pew Research Institute made a research before conference COP 21 in Paris, here you can find some interesting facts about this issue. As world leaders prepare to negotiate an  agreement that will frame a global climate change agenda for the next decade and beyond, a new Pew Research Center survey finds there is an international consensus that climate change poses a serious challenge. Majorities in all 40 nations polled say climate change is a serious problem and a global median of 54% consider it a very serious problem. A median of 78% support the idea of their country limiting greenhouse gas emissions as part of an international agreement to be discussed at the 2015 UN Climate Change Conference in Paris, or COP21. Worries are especially strong in Latin America and Africa. And Americans and Chinese, whose economies are responsible for the greatest annual CO2 emissions, are among the least concerned. In the U.S., 45% of people surveyed say global climate change is a very serious problem and 18% of people surveyed in China say the same.

“The global consensus is that climate change is a serious challenge, not a distant threat,” said Richard Wike, Director of Global Attitudes Research. ” In fact, majorities in most of the nations surveyed say the world’s changing climate is either causing harm in people’s lives now or will cause harm to them in the near future.” Across the nations surveyed, a median of 51% believe people are already being harmed by climate change and another 28% think people will be harmed in the next few years. More than half of those polled in 39 of 40 countries are concerned it will cause harm to them personally during their lifetime, and a global median of 40% are very worried about this. “But such broad, general support masks significant partisan differences,” said Bruce Stokes, Director of Global Economic Attitudes. “Opinions on climate change tend to fall along partisan lines in many of the world’s wealthier nations, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia.” There is general agreement about what should be done to deal with global warming. Majorities in 39 nations say they support their country limiting its emissions as part of a climate accord. Even in China and the United States, large majorities support an international agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. These are among the key findings from a new Pew Research Center survey, conducted in 40 nations among 45,435 respondents from March 25 to May 27, 2015. Additional key findings in the report include:

CLIMATE CHANGE CONSEQUENCES: People worldwide are concerned about a variety of possible consequences of climate change, but drought tops the list. Drought is the most commonly named consequence (or tied for the most commonly named) in 31 countries, including the U.S., where 50% say this is the possible effect that concerns them most. Fears of drought are particularly prevalent in Latin America and Africa. In both regions, a median of 59% say this is their top concern.

LIFESTYLE CHANGES: According to most respondents, confronting climate change will entail more than just policy changes; it will also require significant changes in how people live. A global median of 67% say that to reduce the effects of climate change, people will have to make major changes in their lives. A median of just 22% believe technology can solve this problem without requiring major changes. Even in the U.S., a country known for its technological innovations, 66% believe people will need to significantly alter their lifestyles.

WEALTHY NATIONS SHOULD DO MORE: In most countries, people tend to believe much of the burden for dealing with climate change should be shouldered by wealthier countries. Across the nations polled, a median of 54% agree with the statement “Rich countries, such as the U.S., Japan and Germany, should do more than developing countries because they have produced most of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions so far.” A median of just 38% believe “Developing countries should do just as much as rich  countries because they will produce most of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions in the future.”

PARTISAN DIVIDES: In the U.S., Democrats (68%) are much more likely than Republicans (20%) to believe climate change is a very serious problem and Democrats (82%) more than adherents of the GOP (50%) are supportive of government action to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Partisan divisions on perceptions of climate change are also seen in several other relatively wealthy nations. In Canada, 45% of the supporters of the Conservative party believe that global warming will harm them personally. This compares with 71% of Liberals, who just assumed leadership of the country. In Australia there is a similar difference, just 31% of Liberals see  climate change as harming them, compared with 65% of Labor Party supporters and 72% of Greens. In Germany, 51% of CDU/CSU followers are worried about the personal effects of global warming, but 63% of SPD supporters and 76% of Greens hold this view. Similarly, in the UK, followers of the Conservative Party (39%) are far less worried than backers of the Labour Party (49%).

SUPPORT FOR EMISSIONS LIMITS: Roughly two thirds (69%) of Americans favor Washington agreeing to a multilateral commitment to limit the burning of pollutants such as coal, natural gas or petroleum. In China, the nation responsible for the greatest annual release of CO2 into the atmosphere, about seven-in-ten (71%) support an international treaty to curtail emissions. Regionally, the greatest enthusiasm for limiting emissions is in Europe (a median of 87%). Support is also strong in Latin America (median of 83%). The lowest backing, while still high, is in the Middle East (73%).

COUNTRY-SPECIFIC FINDINGS: A median of 51% of people across the countries surveyed believe people are already being harmed by climate change, but that figure varies widely by country. In Brazil, 90% of people surveyed agree, 59% of people in France, 49% in China, 42% in India, 41% in the U.S. and 31% in South Africa. A median of 40% of those in the nations polled believe climate change will harm them in their lifetime. That figure was 78% in Brazil, 69% in India, 39% in South Africa, 35% in France, 30% in the U.S. and 15% in China.

SOURCE:
www.pewresearch.org

Edited by Vesna Vukajlović

NYC to Create the Largest Electric Vehicle Fleet in the US

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

NYC Clean Fleet, named by NYC mayor Bill de Blasio, is the newest idea in cutting vehicle emissions. This electric vehicle fleet will be the largest to hit cities in the United States. This plan will cut municipal government vehicle emissions in half by 2025, and by a staggering 80% by no later than 2035.
“By building the largest municipal electric fleet in the country – and potentially the world – New York City is continuing to lead by examply,” de Blasio said. “Cities are setting the pace on climate action, and with our city and our planet’s very future at stake, we need national leaders in Paris to take note and take action.”

These talks came after a large electric vehicle fleet was decided upon for England. With over 550 electric vehicles currently on the road in European countries, and more than 100 EV’s delivered to taxi companies across Europe. American drivers and leaders are beginning to stand up and take notice of the strides being made in countries other than our own.
With de Blasio’s current plan to cut vehicle emissions across the city 80% by 2050, the government has a lot of work to do. Because more than 11,000 sedans and SUV’s are operated by municipal employees, the work will be considerable and quite costly. The capital investment of $50-$80 million over the next decade, starting with replacing 2,000 fossil fuel vehicles in the next 10 years alone.

Transportation makes up one quarter of the emissions in New York City. With California becoming a leader in the fight to cut emissions, more vehicles being purchased there than all other states. Over half the EV’s purchased in the US come from California.
New York City will not only boost the EV’s for the municipality, but will offer incentives for those that drive EV’s, such as more options for charging and parking specific to EV’s.

Source: www.greenoptimistic.com

Photo by: www.greenoptimistic.com

Edited by Vesna Vukajlović

Solar Means Business 2015: Top U.S. Corporate Solar Users

Foto: pixabay
Photo: pixabay

More of America’s businesses are choosing to install solar than ever before. Walmart once again took the top spot among America’s businesses in the electric generation capacity of its solar investments and number of solar projects. The big box retailer, based in Bentonville, Ark., boasts a robust 142 megawatts (MW) of solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity and has completed 348 installations.

Many more of the country’s most recognizable and best-run companies continue to expand their use of solar energy. IKEA and Costco are powering stores with solar. FedEx distribution centers are powered by solar. Apple and Verizon data centers are powered by solar. The headquarters and offices of Mortenson Construction, L’Oreal, the Better Business Bureau and Forever 21 also rely on solar. Auto manufacturers such as General Motors, Ford, Toyota and Volkswagen use solar energy, and so do manufacturers such as Owens Corning, Intel, and Johnson & Johnson. Across industries, America’s business leaders are choosing solar to cut costs, help their bottom line and plan for the future.

While this report highlights the ever-expanding list of companies choosing to go solar, it also calls attention to the many ways in which America’s companies are choosing to use solar to meet their business goals.  While solar has long been viewed as an environmentally responsible energy choice, businesses now deploy solar because it is a smart fiscal choice as well. In doing so, these companies have proven the viability of solar technology, showing that it is ready now to provide low-cost power generation on an increasingly large scale. With the right policies in place, solar will continue to play a crucial role in moving America’s economy forward.

SMB-2015_Fig1

From manufacturers to retailers, to tech companies, real estate agencies and financiers, more U.S. businesses are reducing costs by taking advantage of the sharp decline in the cost of solar. Growth in corporate solar adoption has not been limited to traditional solar markets in California, Arizona and New Jersey- this year’s report finds installations in states like Arkansas, Kansas and Indiana. It is increasingly apparent that solar is a smart business decision wherever your business may be.

The growth in solar adoption by America’s business community represents just one piece of the broad-based growth in solar installations we’ve seen in the United States over the last decade.  Spurred by investments in solar made at the residential, commercial and utility-scale level, installed solar capacity in the U.S is 30 times greater today than it was in 2006.  By the end of 2015, there will be enough solar electricity generated in the U.S. to power more than 5.5 million homes.

The increased solar adoption by major corporations shown in this report reflects the overall growth within the broader commercial sector, but more importantly shows that companies that previously installed solar are continuing to add more of it. Companies sampled here installed 1,686 systems totaling 907 MW, generating enough electricity to power more than 158,000 homes. This represents a 59% increase over the findings of last year’s report. While this dataset cannot be considered a comprehensive look, it does provide insight into the diversity of companies that are choosing to go solar.

Commercial Solar is Nationwide

In 2015, Solar Means Business tracked projects in 3 new states, expanding to Arkansas, Kansas and Indiana. In total, the data in this report represents solar powered businesses in 37 states, as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.

SMB-2015_Figure2
The chart above lists the cumulative solar capacity of each state based on the commercial installations covered in this report

IKEA is the company with the most geographically expansive solar fleet, with solar powered stores in 22 different states, but companies like Kohl’s, Whole Foods, General Motors, Target and 15 other leading companies have solar at their facilities in 5 or more states.

 

The Top 25 Companies by Solar Capacity

Many of America’s largest companies have led the way in solar deployment and have done so at an amazing rate. The list below ranks businesses by their total on-site installed solar capacity, or the maximum power potential measured in megawatts.

SMB-2015_Figure3

 

The Top 25 Companies by Number of Installations

The list below ranks businesses by the number of on-site solar PV installations. The Top 25 companies have installed more than 1,462 individual systems, a clear sign that solar meets a range of energy needs for a variety of different companies throughout the US.

SMB-2015_Figure4

 

Variations of Commercial Systems by Array Type

The companies covered in this report use solar in many different ways. With falling costs, more opportunities have become available for smart businesses to take advantage of this clean technology. From carports to ground mounts to rooftop arrays, solar is a flexible energy solution for our nation’s savviest companies.Of projects for which we have data on their mounting type, 58 projects are ground mounted, 1,314 are roof mounted systems and 67 are carports or have carport arrays as a part of the project. Average system sizes vary by project type: roof mounted systems have an average system size of 419 kilowatts (kW); carports have an average system size of 782 kW; and ground mounted systems have an average system size of 2,549 kW.

Roof Mount

The overwhelming majority of projects in this listing are roof-mounted systems, constituting 445 MW of PV capacity and representing more than 90% of the systems within our dataset. These systems frequently can be scaled most cost-effectively, making them attractive to companies with a wide array of building footprints.  Available roof space can be a limiting factor to system size, resulting in the lowest average system size of the three mounting types discussed in this report.

Ground Mount

As evidenced by the average system size, ground mounted systems are typically larger installations that companies with higher levels of electricity such as GM, L’Oreal, and Verizon use to power their manufacturing and data centers. While they number only 4% of projects, they represent more than 15% of all PV capacity within our dataset.

Carports

This sector, in particular, appears to be growing rapidly in terms of both number of installations and average system size. 42 of the 67 carport projects in our dataset have been installed since 2012, with the average system size of these projects moving from 600 kW through 2012 to 790 kW since 2013. Walmart has been a driver of this growth, with 10 carports in Arizona, 12 in California and 1 in New Mexico within the past 3 years.  Intel, Johnson & Johnson, AT&T, GM and Verizon have all also installed carport systems in recent years.

Variations of Commercial Systems by Facility Type

Office Buildings & Corporate Campuses

Companies are powering their offices, headquarters and corporate campuses with solar. This sector represents 72 MW of the total 850 MW tracked in this report. System sizes range from Mortenson Construction’s 20 kW array on their headquarters in Minneapolis to the 5.1 MW array covering Forever 21’s headquarters in Los Angeles. 92 of the 1,580 systems in this dataset are office buildings that have gone solar with an average system size of 782 kW.

Retail

From large retailers to small, America’s companies are going solar. The retail sector itself is comprised of many different businesses and facility types. Large retailers have seen perhaps the most consistent and steady growth over the years as they typically have a similar building structure, which allows them to make large solar installation deals for multiple locations throughout the country. These companies include grocery chains such as Whole Foods and Safeway as well as department stores like Macy’s, Lord & Taylor and JC Penney.

With more than 1,000 projects within this dataset identifying as a retail location, this is easily the largest single sector that has begun adopting solar. These projects combine for a total of 397 MW and range from 4.4 kW to a 1.63 MW array atop the IKEA in Round Rock, TX. Walmart continues to lead both in this sector and overall with 104 MW of capacity at 348 locations. From 2007 through 2010, Walmart installed 40 systems with an average size of 503 kW. In 2011, Walmart’s adoption of solar has only accelerated as we saw 59 installations in 2011 and 75 installations in 2015. Walmart’s leaders clearly recognize the value solar brings to their business.

Companies such as, IKEA, Costco, and Target typically have stores with large square footage and a great deal of unutilized roof space. This allows these companies to build arrays similar in size to some large utility scale projects.

Walgreens is also a growth leader in this space, achieving this through the installation of smaller systems across a large number of their retail facilities. While Walgreens average system size is a bit smaller, they have installed 85 systems at their retail locations this year alone, more than any other company in this list. Walgreens is setting the pace for going solar.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing represents 86 MW across 67 installations within this report, making the average system size 1.3 MW. These are large systems relative to others in the commercial solar sector and they need to be to power the manufacturing facilities of companies like L’Oreal, GM, and Johnson & Johnson.

Data Centers

Data centers are some of the most power hungry facilities and companies such as Verizon, Apple and Amazon have chosen solar energy to meet those needs. Apple is a pioneer in this area with its pair of large 20 MW plants near their data centers in North Carolina and another 20 MW that recently came online in Nevada. The tech giant also recently announced a partnership to power its state of the art headquarters in Cupertino with 130 MW of solar. Amazon, similarly, has announced plans for an 80 MW plant in Maryland. In contrast to these extremely large projects, Verizon’s needs are more dispersed as it has installed more than 7.9 MW at its data centers and mobile switching centers in New Jersey, Maryland, California, Massachusetts and Hawaii.

Distribution Centers & Warehouses

Similar to manufacturing facilities, these facilities often take advantage of the vast and unutilized roof space that results in comparatively large system sizes. Projects covered in this category range from less than 100 kW to more than 8.6 MW, with an overall average system size of 1.5 MW. In total, this dataset tracks 131 projects at distribution centers with more than 196 MW of solar PV cap­acity. Since last year’s report, Walmart, FedEx, Walgreen’s, Prologis, Hartz Mountain and Gap have installed a total of 16 projects with a combined 19.5 MW of capacity. Companies that have already gone solar continue to do so, but overall this space is still underserved relative to its market potential.

Convention Centers

Built for exhibitions and the thousands that attend them, Convention Centers are characterized by massive floor space, massive roof space and massive electricity consumption. The Anaheim Convention Center in California, for example, has 815,000 square feet of exhibit space.[1] It also has a 2.4 MW roof mounted PV system that was completed in late 2014 and covers 300,000 square feet of rooftop.[2] The Meadowlands Convention Center and Hartz Mountain helped to pioneer solar on conference centers with the 412 kW array on the Meadowlands Convention Center in 2009. Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino has a massive 6.4 MW rooftop array, which is the result of a recent 2 MW expansion.

Source: The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA®)

Photo by: Seia

Ride a wind turbine in this crazy wind farm amusement park

Wind-parkTheme parks can be fun for children. Shouldn’t there be a theme park that adults can feel good about? If you’ve ever wanted to see the views from atop a wind turbine, your wish may soon come true. The Dutch renewable energy company Qurrent just unveiled plans to transform a wind farm into the “world’s first sustainable theme park.” Designed in collaboration with Jora Entertainment, the park will be packed with adrenaline-pumping rides from the world’s tallest spiraling water slide to an incredibly fast attraction on a turbine blade booster.

While Qurrent’s planned 8,000-square-meter theme park won’t be the first to be powered by wind, it will be the first to turn wind turbines into amusement park rides. The eco-theme park will also offer more than thrills and novelty. Qurrent envisions the park as a “celebration of environmental contribution” that will showcase Dutch renewable energy and educate the public on sustainable practices.

Some of the featured rides will include Beaufort Buster, a waterslide with a spiral slide wrapping around a wind-turbine. Another great idea is the Blade Runner: a ride ON a turbine blade. Can you imagine spinning around on a windmill blade? This is roughly the same idea. This company will produce a ride that speeds around at a “shockingly” rapid rate.The “Newton Nightmare” is a drop tower that will descend 95 meters in 1.5 seconds flat. Whether young or old, this speed will knock your socks right off. The roller coaster will always be the great standby, and luckily, Qurrent is providing Happy Hurricane Roller coaster.

 “Within ten years from now, wind energy will be ubiquitous,” says Richard Klatten, CEO of Qurrent. “We strive to be ahead of things, and shape the future of renewable energy.

Creating an environment where people can experience clean energy in a fun and educational way could be one of those. And hey – how neat would it be to tell your friends you took a ride on an actual wind turbine?”

Photo by: Qurrent

Source: www.inhabitat.com

 

Climate Change Conference in Kragujevac

On Thursday 1st October, 2015 in Kragujevac a Conference was held under the name “Local communities – key actors in the fight climate change in Serbia” within the set of activities “Ecological challenges: “What about acclimatization?”

The Conference was opened by the Mayor of Kragujevac, Mr. Radomir Nikolic, who on this occasion said that the local government has to act in the fight against climate change, so as to minimize effects on the global level.

French Ambassador to Serbia Her Excellency Mrs. Christine Moro said that the city of Kragujevac was chosen for the Conference on Climate Change due to a long cooperation with the French city of Suresnes, but also because it has taken measures to combat climate change with Suresnes in the field of waste processing. She emphasized the importance of the fight against climate change and in particular the importance of action at the local level, not only at the national level. Furthermore, she added that climate change arisen from human influences and that they have a serious impact on the global level. As she stated, Subotica is the only local government in Serbia which has measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while in France this is at a much higher level. Thus, in France in some municipalities plans are implemented to contribute to the increase of renewable energy, reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, energy storage, smart grids, smart polluters, energy saving.

Ms. Moro reminded that France chaired this year’s Conference on Climate Change COP21 in the framework of which is expected to achieve a global agreement on climate change. As stated, each of the 195 participating countries and the European Union had to submit the national plan to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, which was so far done by around 120 countries. She pointed out that the current engagement on climate issues was insufficient to reduce global temperature by 2 degrees Celsius by 2100, but that this can be achieved in the future thanks to new technologies that enable the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions which are constantly appearing. Ms. Moro recalled that the meetings were held a few months ago about the upcoming Climate Change Conference in Paris and announced that in the future period she expected more similar meetings and conferences on this issue.

The representative of the French municipality Metz, Mr. Sebastian Douche spoke about the legal framework for the energy transition in France and the European Union and emphasized that for this field a model of sustainable development was very important. As he said, sustainable development involved reducing greenhouse gas emissions, reducing energy consumption, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, adapting territories so that climate change would be less perceptible. Speaking about the global context, Mr. Douche reminded us that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was adopted in 1992 and entered into force in 1994, while the Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997 and ratified in 2005. As he pointed out, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change encouraged signatory countries to stabilize the emissions of greenhouse gases, while the Kyoto Protocol committed them to do so. The first commitment period of the Protocol related to the period from 2008 to 2012 when the countries that ratified it had an obligation to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases by 8 percent compared to 1990, while the second commitment period from 2013 to 2020 predicts the emissions of greenhouse gases to be reduced by at least 18 percent by 2020. The European Union adopted in 2008 a package on climate and energy which predicts that by 2020 the emissions of greenhouse gases is reduced by 20 percent compared to 1990, energy consumption is reduced by 20 percent compared to 1990 and the share of the renewable energy is increased by 20 percent compared to 1990. In 2005 France adopted a law which defines the objectives for changing energy policy, which includes the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 75 percent compared to 1990 but without a time frame. In addition to this other laws were adopted that allow the operation of local communities on local level, as well as the Law on energy transition that stipulates: the reduction of the emissions of greenhouse gases by 40 percent by 2030 and 75 percent by 2050, the increase of the share of renewable energy by 32 percent by 2030, the reduction of use of fossil fuels by 30 percent and nuclear power by 50 percent by 2025. He added that the municipality of Metz in 2009 started implementing the plan Climate, energy at the local level which involved making a balance of the emissions of greenhouse gases and carbon emitted vapors, developing strategies for the reduction of such emissions by 2020 and the development and implementation of an action plan.

The representative of the Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Ms. Danijela Bozanic said that they created a two-year updated report for better monitoring of the emissions of greenhouse gases and that all interested parties can submit their comments on the report by 20th October, 2015. She stated that the Republic of Serbia has developed a Strategy to fight against climate change with an action plan, very soon a publication will be issued The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and the National Council on Climate Change was established.

The representative of the Secretariat for Environmental Protection of Belgrade, Mr. Miodrag Grujic presented an action plan for adaptation to climate change in the city of Belgrade. As he said, Belgrade made a decision at the end of 2013 to realize this project, and for the very development of the plan it took about a year.

The representative of the French city of Suresnes, Mr. Rafael Gudeti presented examples of good practice in energy efficiency, environmental protection and renewable energy. As he pointed out, the city replaced public lighting with LED lighting which contributed to energy savings of about 60 percent, private and public buildings were renovated in order to contribute to the increase of energy efficiency, the filter on the main pool was replaced which annually saves about 35 thousand cubic meter of water, replacement of cars and buses with ecological vehicles is in process, a system of buried containers was implemented which contributed to the increase of green areas.

The representative of the city of Kragujevac, Mr. Vladimir Maksimovic said that Kragujevac has big problems with the waste management because the daily production of over 160 tons of municipal waste goes to dysfunctional dump in Jovanovac. He specified that it is planned to introduce LED public lighting, to do a study on dynamic transport, that is to replace public vehicles with ecological vehicles. He added that they established the Department for Energy Efficiency which is working on scanning the actual state of things, preparation of projects and finding sources for funding this field.
The conference was attended by the representatives of: the Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection, the French Embassy, the EU Delegation in Serbia, UNDP, SKGO, local governments, public and private companies, NGOs, and the organizers were the French Embassy and the city of Kragujevac.

Sandra Jovicevic

 

EP Interview Hon. Branko Terzić

Branko Tetzic hon.

Branko Tetzic hon.Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Efficiency in 2015 and beyond

The turn of the year presents a usual moment to consider what is behind us. On setting goals, global and regional trends and developments in the energy sector, we have talked to Hon. Branko Terzić. Author: Jadranka Mašić-Pavlović

Read the whole interview Branko Terzic int ENG