Home Blog Page 343

This Map Shows the Countries with the Most ‘Toxic’ Environments on Earth

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have been named the most “toxic” nations on Earth in a new report.

The Eco Experts gathered data on and then ranked 135 countries based on five environmental factors: Energy consumption per capita, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, air pollution levels, deaths attributable to air pollution, and renewable energy production.

So instead of simply looking at levels of air pollution, the study also focused on the work being done to tackle climate change.

According to the data, Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s largest oil producers but also has some of the world’s lowest renewable energy contributions, despite having weather conditions ideal for solar energy. The Eco Experts says this suggests a disregard for the environment and the population’s health.

Meanwhile, China is aiming to invest £292 billion in renewable energy by 2020, according to The Guardian. This means that while the country’s pollution levels remain notoriously high, it’s actively searching for a path to a greener future and therefore falls lower down the toxicity ranking.

The most toxic European country was Luxembourg which suffers from heavy pollution from neighbouring countries including Germany and Belgium. The UK ranked 81st for toxicity, while the US fared slightly worse in 66th.

The 10 most toxic countries were: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Turkmenistan, Libya, Kazakhstan, stTrinidad and Tobago.

The least toxic nations according to the report are mostly African nations such as Kenya, Mozambique, and Ethiopia, where a lack of industrialisation has led to less polluted air — although the study did not take water pollution into account, which is real problem in Africa.

Source: independent.co.uk

Environmental Security in a Changing World

Photo: UNEP
Photo: UNEP

In the lead-up to the G7 Summit, UN Environment in partnership with the Italian G 7 Presidency / Italian Ministry of Environment organized last week a High-level Dialogue and Press Briefing entitled “Environmental Security in a Changing World”.

The event sheds light on the top environmental issues proposed for the G7 Agenda in the context of global environmental priorities, growing challenges, and multi-lateral obligations – from the Paris Agreement to the 2030 Global Goals.

Participating in the event were 130 eminent scientists and government representatives from 40 countries, members of the scientific panel responsible for producing the UN World Environment Report (known as Global Environment Outlook – GEO). The Outlook is an authoritative assessment of the state of the global environment that provides an evaluation of environmental trends, challenges, policy interventions and proposes policy options.

Also participants were members of civil society, the business sector and the media.

Source: unep.org

NASA Saves Energy, Water with Modular Supercomputer

The supercomputer at NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, CA, is using an innovative modular approach that is designed to get researchers the answers that they need, while reducing the high level of energy and water traditionally required for these cutting edge machines.

Scientific Computing lays out the issue: All of today’s modern supercomputers must be optimised in some way for energy efficiency because of the huge power consumption of large supercomputers. The Top500 is a prime example of this. Each of the top 10 systems consumes megawatts of power, with the very largest consuming in excess of 15 megawatts.

The NASA system, called Electra, is expected to save 1 million kWh and 1.3 million gallons of water annually by virtue of its modular construction. Computing assets are added – and thus need to be cooled – only as necessary. The system, according to the story at Scientific Computing, is designed to work within a power usage effectiveness (PUE) range of 1.03 to 1.05. The current lead supercomputer for NASA, Pleaides, runs a PUE of about 1.3.

Space Daily describes Electra’s flexibility. The story says that NASA is considering an expansion to 16 times its current capacity. Some of the energy benefits are indirect: Since researchers can log in remotely to utilize Electra, pressure will be taken off the supercomputers those scientists and engineers would otherwise access. Thus, the overall benefit to the environment is a bit hidden – but there nonetheless.

Electra is expected to provide 280 million hours of computing time annually and currently is 39th on the U.S. TOP500 list of computer systems, according to Space Daily (Scientific Computing says Pleaides is 13th.) The modular super computer center at Ames was built and installed by SGI/CommScope and is managed by the NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division.

Modular datacenters use the same basic approach to reduce energy use.

Source: energymanagertoday.com

Tesla Tells Investors A Plan for Four More Gigafactories Will Be Released

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Tesla

Tesla expects demand for electric vehicle batteries will be strong enough to add four more Gigafactories beyond its current Nevada plant.

In a note to investors Wednesday with its quarterly financial report, the company said it will lay out those plans by the end of the year.

As for “Gigactory 2,” that plant will be placed at SolarCity’s facility in Buffalo, N.Y., which Tesla acquired through the acquisition of the solar power company.

Tesla has been preparing that Buffalo facility to open a solar cell and modular manufacturing division with Panasonic Corp. Production is scheduled to being there this summer, with about 1,400 workers expected to eventually be employed in the solar plant.

There will be much interest in where the other three new Gigafactories will be established. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has tweeted and made media comments about the possibility of opening shop in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe, and in India. There’s also been speculation that Tesla will add battery production to its vehicle factory in China.

The next Gigafactories will also likely be considered for jobs beyond lithium-ion battery packs used in Tesla vehicles. In January, the company announced it will be adding electric motor and gearbox production to the Gigafactory in Nevada. There’s also Powerwall energy storage batteries, which Tesla has added to the Nevada factory.

Tesla and partner-company Panasonic announced last month that Gigafactory is up and running. The factory, located near Reno, is about one third complete. About 6,500 people are expected to be working there by year’s end with capacity for a total of 10,000 workers at that plant to be met by 2020.

During its fourth quarter earnings report, the company stated that $522 million had been spent during that time on capital expenditures that included the Gigafactory build-out.

Tesla said it will be investing $2 billion to $2.5 billion to ramp up its factory for Model 3 production.

Source: hybridcars.com

Couple Converts 16-Year-Old Van into a Compact Solar Home on Wheels

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

An increasing number of digital nomads are replacing their conventional houses with practical, mobile homes powered by renewable energy technologies. Freelancer photographer Norbert Juhász and his fiancée Dora, a writer, have joined the fray with a 16-year-old van they transformed into a solar-powered home on wheels, and they’re driving it from Budapest to Morocco.

While the exterior of the van is unremarkable, its interior packs all the amenities the couple needs on their journey. A multifunctional seat turns into a bed for two and includes a storage space and electrical system underneath. Opposite the bed is a small kitchen unit with a gas cooktop, gas cylinder, sink and a large water tank with a pressure-sensing pump. The tank is connected to an extra hook-up that leads to the rear of the van, where the water is used for quick showers. An L-shaped cabinet accommodates a refrigerator and more storage spaces, and features another section that doubles as a seating structure.

The vehicle is powered by a 12-volt electrical system charged by either the 250-watt solar panels mounted on the roof, or the engine’s generator. Excess energy can be stored in 200-Ah batteries attached to an inverter.

The couple spent around $7,200 for the van’s transformation, including its custom-made furniture. They will travel through Southern Europe all the way to Morocco, and document their journey on the Rundabella website and Facebook page.

Source: inhabitat.com

‘Paris Agreement Not Enough’ to Prevent Catastrophic Coral Bleaching, Marine Biologists Warn

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Current targets for reducing damaging greenhouse gas emissions are not enough to prevent catastrophic loss of the world’s coral reefs, marine biologists have warned.

Rising sea surface temperatures are having a devastating effect on coral reefs, many of which are forecast to see severe coral bleaching for an unparalleled fourth year in a row.

Temperature rises mean bleaching events, which can kill coral, will occur with increasing frequency, unless drastic action is taken to stop global climate change, studies suggest.

In Australia, a heatwave which has caused record-breaking temperatures and wildfires, has also meant no relief for the Great Barrier Reef, which was ravaged by heat-induced bleaching last year, killing swathes of the coral.

The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) has called for government action to address the problem which is expected to worsen as temperatures rose above 47C in parts of Australia.

Satellite thermal imaging of the area has revealed that waters are unusually warm, and the reef has been put on red alert for further significant bleaching.

AMCS Great Barrier Reef Campaign Director Imogen Zethoven said: “Signs of new coral bleaching in February, plus the likelihood of extensive severe bleaching and even mortality in the next four weeks, is extremely concerning.”

“Last year we witnessed the worst bleaching event on record for our reef. Tragically between 50 and 85 per cent of corals perished between Cape York and Lizard Island. Over the entire reef, 22 per cent of corals are dead.”

The society has called on the Australian government to end its support for the coal industry and begin a “rapid move to renewables”.

Last month, Japan’s environment ministry reported that over 70 per cent of the country’s largest coral reef was “dead” after sea temperatures were between one and two degrees Celsius higher than normal.

Coral bleaching occurs when stresses such as higher water temperatures cause the corals to expel symbiotic photosynthetic algae, draining them of all colour and eventually causing them to die.

Coral bleaching is not uncommon, and bleaching events usually occur somewhere on the planet every year. However, the increasing frequency of the shocks mean the coral does not have adequate time to recover.

The current global coral bleaching event is the longest and most widespread ever recorded.

A 2016 study into the phenomenon predicted that annual severe bleaching events could become the norm by 2043.

Dr Gareth Williams of Bangor University, who worked on the study, told The Independent that though the situation was “terrifying”, action can be taken to help prevent catastrophic loss of coral.

He said: “There’s a double edged sword at the moment, and humans are at the root of both problems.

“Evolutionary processes mean [the coral] is designed to take environmental shocks. Key processes help them to recover between these events.

“But many of our local impacts such as fishing and pollution are eroding those critical recovery functions.

“And the second problem, which is more terrifying, is that the speed they are getting hit with environmental shocks is increasing. Even if those recovery mechanisms are in place so that the reef can recover in between shocks, the shocks are coming so close together there’s not even time for these processes to kick in.”

Dr Williams said that the problem was not just confined to reefs close to human activity, but warming seas are also having an impact on coral in some of the planet’s most isolated areas.

“If you go to some of the world’s most remote reefs, away from direct human impacts such as fishing and pollution, they are still suffering the effects of these warmer conditions,” he said.

“The critical thing here is that we have to tackle global climate change. But what will save coral reefs is a planet-wide multi-government co-ordinated effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“There’s huge danger in thinking we can climate-proof coral reefs. That’s a dangerous idea. We have to start tackling the root cause of this, and the root cause is global climate change.”

He added: “The Paris agreement is good example of a co-ordinated effort to try and curb greenhouse gas emissions, and if we stick to it, it will reduce greenhouse gases, but even if we adhere to it, it won’t buy that much more time for reefs.

“It’s optimistic at best. We need to go beyond the Paris agreement. But of course we have to start somewhere.”

Source: independent.co.uk

IAEA Concludes Safety Review at Doel Nuclear Power Plant in Belgium

Photo: iaea.org
Photo: iaea.org

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team of nuclear safety experts today completed an assessment of long-term operational safety at the Doel Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Unit 1 and 2 in Belgium.

The Safety Aspects of Long Term Operation (SALTO) review mission was requested by the Belgian Ministry of Security and the Interior (IBZ). The in-depth review, which began on 14 February, focused on aspects essential to the safe long-term operation (LTO) of the two units, which were put in commercial operation in 1975. Doel units 3 and 4 were not part of the review.

In October 2015, the Belgian Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) approved the operator’s application to extend the operation of Units 1 and 2 by 10 years to 2025, pending the fulfilment of several safety-related conditions.

The SALTO team reviewed the plant’s organization and programmes related to LTO, including human resources and knowledge management. The findings of SALTO reviews are based on the IAEA safety standards.

The IAEA team concluded that the plant had made significant progress on ageing management and preparation for safe LTO. The plant’s LTO project has addressed most of the areas recommended by IAEA safety standards, and is addressing remaining topics.

The team identified several good practices at the plant that will be shared with the nuclear industry globally, including:

The plant uses integrated risk management for LTO at programme and individual project levels.

The plant’s comprehensive scoping methodology for LTO evaluation.

The plant uses incentives to keep staff and takes measures to ensure knowledge is not lost with turnover.

The team provided a number of recommendations for improvements to LTO safety, including:

The plant should ensure that all required systems, structures and components are included in the scope of ageing management during the LTO period.

The plant should ensure consistency and completeness of data for structures and components in the scope of LTO.

The plant should complete the review and update of the ageing management programmes for civil structures and components for the purpose of LTO.

The Doel plant management said it was committed to implementing the recommendations and requested that the IAEA schedule a follow-up mission in approximately two years.

The team has provided a draft report to the plant management. The plant and FANC will have an opportunity to make factual comments on the draft. A final report will be submitted to the plant, FANC and the Belgian Government within three months.

The review team comprised experts from Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Japan, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the IAEA.

Source: iaea.org

Ikea Plans Mushroom-Based Packaging as Eco-Friendly Replacement for Polystyrene

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Ikea plans to use packaging made with mushrooms as an eco-friendly replacement for polystyrene, the Swedish retail giant has revealed.

The flat-pack furniture retailer is looking at using the biodegradable “fungi packaging” as part of its efforts to reduce waste and increase recycling, Joanna Yarrow, head of sustainability for Ikea in the UK said.

“We are looking for innovative alternatives to materials, such as replacing our polystyrene packaging with mycelium – fungi packaging,” she said.

Mycelium is the part of a fungus that grows in a mass of branched fibres, attaching to the soil or whatever it is growing on – in effect, mushroom roots.

US firm Ecovative developed the product, which it calls Mushroom Packaging, by letting the mycelium grow around clean agricultural waste, such as corn stalks or husks.

Over the space of a few days the fungus fibres bind the waste together, forming a solid shape, which is then dried to stop it growing any further.

Ms Yarrow told the Telegraph that Ikea was looking at introducing mycelium packaging because “a lot of products come in polystyrene, traditionally, which can’t be – or is very difficult to – recycle”.

While polystyrene takes thousands of years to decompose, mycelium packaging can be disposed of simply by throwing it in the garden where it will biodegrade naturally within a few weeks.

Speaking at an Aldersgate Group sustainability event in London this week, Ms Yarrow added: “The great thing about mycelium is you can grow it into a mould that then fits exactly. You can create bespoke packaging.”

An Ikea spokesman confirmed it was looking at working with Ecovative, adding: “We always look for new and innovative processes and sustainable materials that can contribute to our commitment.

“Mycelium is one of the materials IKEA is looking into, but it is currently not used in production.”

Ecovative, whose founders invented the mushroom-based material in 2006, currently manufactures its packaging in New York. Customers include computer giant Dell, which uses it to cushion large computer servers.

A handful of companies are believed to use the product in the UK.

Ikea’s green drive has already seen it launch vegetarian meatballs as a more eco-friendly alternative to the Swedish meatballs served in its cafes, because of concerns about the greenhouse gas emissions from beef and pork.

A spokesman for the retailer said: “IKEA wants to have a positive impact on people and planet, which includes taking a lead in turning waste into resources, developing reverse material flows for waste materials and ensuring key parts of our range are easily recycled.

“IKEA has committed to take a lead in reducing its use of fossil –based materials while increasing its use of renewable and recycled materials.”

Source: telegraph.co.uk

Energy Positive: How Denmark’s Samsø Island Switched to Zero Carbon

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Anyone doubting the potential of renewable energy need look no further than the Danish island of Samsø. The 4,000-inhabitant island nestled in the Kattegat Sea has been energy-positive for the past decade, producing more energy from wind and biomass than it consumes.

Samsø’s transformation from a carbon-dependent importer of oil and coal-fuelled electricity to a paragon of renewables started in 1998. That year, the island won a competition sponsored by the Danish ministry of environment and energy that was looking for a showcase community – one that could prove the country’s freshly announced Kyoto target to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 21% was, in fact, achievable.

The contest didn’t bring with it funds to bankroll the energy transition. But it did pay for the salary of one person tasked with making the island’s 10-year renewables master plan a reality.

That person was Søren Hermansen, a Samsø native vegetable farmer–turned–environmental teacher. Hermansen has wielded his pragmatic, roll-up-your-sleeves attitude to great effect over the past two decades, turning his own rural community into a green powerhouse, and evangelising to communities around the world that they, too, can make the transition.

“It was not an overnight process,” says Hermansen, who heads the Samsø Energy and Environment Organisation, and is chief executive of the Samsø Energy Academy. He is currently in Australia to speak at the Community Energy Congress in Melbourne.

In less than a decade, the transformation to carbon neutral was complete. By 2000, 11 one-megawatt (MW) wind turbines supplied the island’s 22 villages with enough energy to make it self-sufficient. An additional 10 offshore wind turbines were erected in 2002, generating 23MW of electricity to offset emissions from the island’s cars, buses, tractors and ferries that connect it to the mainland.

Electricity generation wasn’t the only goal. Between 2002 and 2005, three district heating systems were built. These now supply – via “miles of miles of piping” – three-quarters of the island’s houses with heating and hot water from centralised biomass boilers fuelled with locally grown straw. Meanwhile, houses outside of the heating districts have replaced old oil furnaces with solar collectors or biomass boilers of their own.

Samsø residents can now boast a carbon footprint of negative 12 tonnes per person per year, compared with a Danish average of 6.2 tonnes and 17 tonnes in Australia in 2015.

Søren Hermansen from Danish island of Samsø was tasked with making the island 100% carbon neutral – and he did so in less than a decade.

Community buy-in was essential to making the zero-carbon master plan a reality, says Hermansen. And although there were sceptics in the beginning, the level of commitment by locals is evident in the unique patterns of ownership that have emerged. The wind turbines, for instance, are owned by a combination of private owners, investor groups, the municipal government and local cooperatives.

“We live in a small community, so it’s very important that we share the ownership,” says Hermansen. For the onshore wind turbines, the idea was that if you could see the turbine from your window, you could sign on as a co-investor. According to Hermansen, this approach quelled any simmering discontent (over the look of the turbines, say) that could have arisen if only some in the community stood to benefit.

Locals signed on to the tune of AU $2.5m, enough to purchase two turbines outright, with the remaining nine purchased by individuals. Two offshore turbines are also cooperatively owned, and the five owned by the municipality generate income the local government can reinvest in ongoing sustainability projects.

Everyone has taken the green ethos to heart. Locals own the highest number of electric cars per capita in Denmark, and are often champing at the bit to get involved in the next green project in the offing, says Hermansen.

That enthusiasm derives as much from a desire to be a self-sufficient, thriving rural community as it does from a desire to cut emissions. The constant hum of infrastructure projects has had an invigorating effect on the community, providing much-needed jobs for locals and a steady stream of eco-visitors looking to learn from the island’s achievements.

The island’s vision now is to be fossil fuel-free by 2030. Two years ago the municipality replaced its diesel-powered ferry with one that runs on gas, and the long-term plan is to convert the ferry to run off island-generated biofuel and wind-charged batteries. Other petrol-powered vehicles will also be phased out in favour of electric or biofuel alternatives.

It’s easy to think of Samsø’s energy makeover as a special case, driven by the grit and determination of sturdy Scandinavians living on a windswept former Viking outpost. But Hermansen insists that’s not the case. “You shouldn’t see Samsø as ‘the’ model,” he says. Far larger communities of tens of thousands of residents are also transitioning to renewable energy, for example. “Samsø is just a reflection of what is happening in Danish society in general. We are national policy in practice,” he says.

This hasn’t been his experience here in Australia. Local enthusiasm – in the New South Wales town of Armidale, or South Australia’s Kangaroo Island, for example – isn’t matched at the federal government level in Canberra. “I think there’s a disconnect between rural areas and the federal administration,” he says.

In his experience, federal-level support – through appropriate feed-in tariffs for renewable energy, and government incentives to adopt new technologies – is essential. “It is very important that the federal government gives it the right framework,” he says.

Source: theguardian.com

EU Carbon Market at Risk of Another Lost Decade

Photo: pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Next week, EU environment ministers are to strike a deal on the reform of the Emissions Trading System (ETS). If governments do not treat the reform with more seriousness, the EU risks setting its carbon market up for another decade of failure, argues Wendel Trio, director of Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.

The current proposals are clearly not in line with the EU’s commitment under the Paris Agreement to keep the temperature rise well below 2°C, let alone below 1.5°C. This would profoundly damage the EU’s reputation as a frontrunner in the fight against climate change and further deteriorate EU citizens’ trust in the bloc’s ability to act.

Often hailed as the cornerstone in the EU’s efforts to tackle climate change, the ETS has suffered from a gigantic oversupply of pollution permits. As a result, at the moment permit prices are hovering around €5 per tonne of carbon dioxide – much too low to drive emissions cuts or speed up the transition to a green economy. The chasm is huge: to influence investors’ interest in low-carbon technologies, the carbon price should be raised to at least €40.

The ongoing post-2020 reform is urgently needed to make the ETS relevant again. The redesign of the ETS is negotiated among EU governments, the European Parliament and the European Commission. The process has entered a critical phase. Last week the European Parliament adopted a weak position that would keep the carbon market ineffective for a decade or more. In particular, it refused to increase annual emission cuts (via the so-called Linear Reduction Factor) from 2.2% to 2.4% per year and align the starting level of the new carbon budget with actual emissions, which will create a new surplus right from the start of a new trading period.

The responsibility of tackling the ETS’ core deficit, its giant surplus of allowances, is now with EU governments. Without raising the ambition of the reform proposal, the market will remain oversupplied until 2030. The figures speak loud and clear: the total surplus of allowances will amount to more than 6 billion by 2030.

A crucial element of the reform relates to the design of the so-called Market Stability Reserve (MSR). The MSR is a kind of bank where surplus allowances will be stored temporarily after 2019. Many EU countries support doubling the intake rate of the MSR for the first four years of its operation. However, the measure is far too weak to have a meaningful impact on the carbon price. According to Reuters, it will cut the surplus by a mere 111 million permits a year till 2022. The carbon price will reach at best €20 in 2030, meaning the ETS will not influence investment decisions.

The ministers must support three additional measures that are currently being debated. First, 800 million pollution permits need to be permanently cancelled from the MSR, as recommended by the European Parliament. Second, unallocated permits should have an expiry date: those that remain unused in the MSR for five years should be automatically cancelled. Third, more ambitious EU countries should be given the opportunity to unilaterally cancel oversupplied permits and thus ratchet up their ambition over time.

These measures alone will not fix the ETS, nor make EU climate policies coherent with the Paris Agreement. For that to happen, annual emission reductions need to go well beyond the proposed 2.2% and billions of surplus emission allowances need to be permanently taken off the market. The EU has to step up its game to deliver on the promises it made in Paris. It is unacceptable that instead of looking at ways to increase the level of ambition, the EU is set to lock in another decade of failed climate policy.

Source: euractiv.com

Central American Sustainable Energy Experts Endorse Plans for the New Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency of the SICA Countries (SICREEE)

The current Costa Rican presidency of the Central American Integration System (SICA) hosted a regional workshop that validated the technical design and institutional set-up of the future SICA Regional Center for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (SICREEE).

The workshop was another step forward in the establishment of SICREEE, which will support the region’s transition to sustainable energy use. SICA is the economic and political organization of the Central American states: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama and the Dominican Republic.

The two-day workshop was co-organized by Costa Rica’s Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE) and the General Secretariat of the SICA. During the workshop, the technical and institutional design of the Regional Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency was presented. To complete the proposal, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) provided the technical assistance needed. UNIDO has also conducted a consultation process that included a regional needs assessment and the development of the project document.

The workshop was attended by more than 60 Central American experts and specialists from the public and private sectors, who recommended that SICREEE focuses on policy implementation, capacity development, knowledge management, and awareness-raising, as well as on the creation of business opportunities for the local sustainable energy industry. The center will play a key role in creating economies of scale, thus fostering a more competitive market in the sustainable energy sector and will allow the region to be less dependent on imported fossil fuel.

The workshop completed the preparatory phase of SICREEE. It was agreed that the final SICREEE project document will be submitted for consideration to the next Council of Energy Ministers of the SICA countries. Subsequent to its approval, the selection process of the host country for the Secretariat of the center will begin.

When SICREEE is integrated into UNIDO’s Global Network of Regional Sustainable Energy Centres, south-south cooperation and post-2015 triangular cooperation will be promoted together with the other regional centers already operating in Africa, the Caribbean, the Pacific islands, and other regions.

Source: unido.org

Vice-President of European Commision Attends Southern Gas Advisory Council Meeting

Yesterday  a ministerial meeting of the Southern Gas Advisory Council was held in Baku, Azerbaijan. Participants discussed bringing gas to EU markets from regions to the south and east of Europe along the Southern Gas Corridor. European Commission Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič and the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, attended the meeting, along with representatives of countries located along the Southern Gas Corridor.

Ahead of the meeting, Vice-President Šefčovič said:

‘Energy Union delivers. By 2020, we will have gas flowing through the Southern Gas Corridor to Europe; further diversifying our energy supplies. Building the Energy Union is not an end in itself. It is a huge modernization programme for Europe, benefiting young Europeans, entrepreneurs and mayors across the continent.’

The EU has identified the Southern Gas Corridor as a route that will make it possible to transport gas from the Caspian Basin, Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Eastern Mediterranean Basin to Central and South East Europe by 2020. This will diversify the sources of gas available to this region and enhance Europe’s security of energy supply, which is one of the five dimensions of the EU’s Energy Union strategy.

Source: ec.europa.eu

Athos Completes Two Large-Scale PV Plants in Iran

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

The German company has installed and commissioned two PV power plants in Iran, totaling 14 MW. Project costs of US $21m were all equity financed by Athos.

With the help of German based project developer Athos Solar, Iran has taken an important step towards generating more of its energy from solar power. At the beginning of February, two PV plants with a total output of 14 megawatts were commissioned in the presence of German ambassador Michael Klor-Berchthold and Iranian energy minister Hamid Chitchian.

According to Athos, it took just nine months from first contact with the Iranian developer to complete the two green field plants, both 100 hectares, in the province Hamadan near Teheran. Thereby the majority of all needed components, including 40,000 PV modules from Canadian solar, had to be imported into Iran. Christian Lindner, CEO of Athos Solar said: The collaboration with the Iranian authorities, who were extremely cooperative, worked out smoothly. You can sense a great openness and interest in this kind of energy generation.”

The costs of the project, almost US$21m, were financed entirely by equity from Athos as an investor. According to Christian Linder, this is currently the only way to realize projects in Iran. “Bank financing is simply not possible; even conducting a usual transaction is a daily challenge.

As the project developer reported, the construction of the two PV plants, which were initiated by business partners from Iran and the U.K, represent Athos´ first project in the Middle East. Given the positive experience, more projects are planned but a matter of the political situation in the region.

Source: pv-magazine.com

Low-Carbon Policy ‘Less Vital than Low Energy Bills and Security’

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Ministers should establish a new energy commission to spur on construction of power stations because successive governments have failed to encourage enough fresh power capacity in the UK, according to a House of Lords report.

Subsidy-backed growth in renewable energy projects, such as windfarms, has deterred the construction of new conventional power plants, the economic affairs committee claimed.

The peers envisage the new energy commission would oversee auctions where all technologies, including gas power, competed for guaranteed electricity prices. The auctions would provide the required amount of capacity and cap carbon emissions.

At present the government only allows low-carbon power, such as windfarms and new nuclear power stations, to compete in auctions for such deals, known as contracts for difference.

The influential cross-party group of peers concluded that successive governments have got their priorities wrong on energy policy by giving priority to carbon emissions cuts – a statutory duty under the Climate Change Act – over keeping costs down and keeping the lights on.

The report has sparked an angry response. Robert Gross, director of the centre for energy policy and technology at Imperial College, London, said: “The term ‘post truth’ has become over-used. Yet it would be possible to take all the evidence the committee presents and tell a completely different story: there’s been huge success in growing renewables and reducing emissions from the power sector.”

Lord Hollick, the committee’s chair, said: “We are critical of the drift that’s taken place over the last 15 years or so, which has delivered on the decarbonisation agenda but very much at the expense of consumers paying 58% more than they were in 2003. On the affordability front we haven’t looked after consumers.”

The peers, who include the former chancellor Norman Lamont, and a former head of the civil service, Andrew Turnbull, said security of supply should become the key aim of energy policy, above decarbonisation and cost.

“Low-carbon but chronically unreliable electricity is not acceptable. Similarly very cheap prices at the expense of frequent shortages would be unacceptable,” the report says, which also claims fossil fuels have remained cheaper than renewable sources.

But Paul Massara, the former chief executive of npower who now runs the renewable energy firm North Star Solar, said the committee was simply wrong to say fossil fuels were always cheaper than renewables, and condemned the report as “backward looking”.

Darren Baxter, a researcher at the Institute for Public Policy Research thinktank, said: “A failure to keep the pace up with decarbonisation, as suggested in this report, would be a disaster for the north [of England] and its growing low-carbon economy.”

Hollick told the Guardian that the government had micromanaged the energy market and did not need to interfere as much. He said the government “should now allow the energy commission to move forward, to run auctions, to fill the gap and to build a properly balanced [energy system]”.

Hollick denied the report was anti-renewables. “Exactly the opposite. We see renewables very much as the way forward,” he said, arguing that more public money should go into R&D in renewables and energy storage.

The committee also urged the government to publish its plan B if the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, which is expected to provide 7% of the UK’s electricity from 2025, is delayed or even cancelled. Hollick said the biggest surprise during the committee’s inquiry was the “fragility” of the government’s nuclear ambitions, which envisage new nuclear reactors in Somerset, Suffolk, Anglesey and Cumbria.

“It is imperative that the government publishes it contingency plans for how it will make up the capacity due to be provided by these plants in the event one or more does not succeed or is delayed,” the report says.

Hollick said he expected the government’s energy back-up plan to be made up largely of new gas power stations and offshore windfarms.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said: “Keeping the lights on is non-negotiable. Our top priority is making sure UK families and businesses have secure, affordable energy supplies.”

Source: theguardian.com

MPs Warn Heathrow Expansion is ‘Magical Thinking’

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

UK MPs have said that the Heathrow Airport expansion can only be justified if the government proves it will not break laws on climate change and pollution.

Ministers say a third runway would not exceed environment limits.

However, the Commons Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) has accused the government of ‘magical thinking’ – wishing the problem away without a proper solution.

They say ministers must show the expansion will not fuel climate change.

Committee chair Mary Creagh said: “There’s plenty of talk about how the government wants to solve environmental problems at Heathrow, but a total absence of any policy guarantees.

“The implication of this is that they think other sectors of the economy like energy and industry are going to have to cut their carbon emissions even more so people can fly more – but the government’s been told by its own advisors (the Committee on Climate Change (CCC)) that’s not possible.”

The MPs also criticised the government’s reliance on a projected increase in electric vehicles on the roads to keep local air pollution within safe limits.

Creagh added: “The government has missed already its targets for electric vehicles.

“Our committee has no confidence it will meet its target for 2020 or 2030. Ministers have got to put proper policies in place instead of relying on magical thinking.”

The UK has already breached EU limits in London for the pollutant NO2 for 2017. The committee says a new air quality strategy is needed to ensure that airport expansion does not harm public health.

The government has said after Brexit that EU environmental laws will be imported wholesale into the UK, but the MPs say they have seen no guarantees that the government will keep pace with future EU air quality laws.

Source: paneuropeannetworks.com

Solar Panels Get a Face-Lift with Custom Designs

Residential solar power is on a sharp rise in the United States as photovoltaic systems become cheaper and more powerful for homeowners. A 2012 study by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) predicts that solar could reach 1 million to 3.8 million homes by 2020, a big leap from just 30,000 homes in 2006.

But that adoption rate could still use a boost, according to MIT spinout Sistine Solar. “If you look at the landscape today, less than 1 percent of U.S. households have gone solar, so it’s nowhere near mass adoption,” says co-founder Senthil Balasubramanian MBA ’13.

Founded at the MIT Sloan School of Management, Sistine creates custom solar panels designed to mimic home facades and other environments, with aims of enticing more homeowners to install photovoltaic systems.

Sistine’s novel technology, SolarSkin, is a layer that can be imprinted with any image and embedded into a solar panel without interfering with the panel’s efficacy. Homeowners can match their rooftop or a grassy lawn. Panels can also be fitted with business logos, advertisements, or even a country’s flag. SolarSkin systems cost about 10 percent more than traditional panel installations. But over the life of the system, a homeowner can still expect to save more than $30,000, according to the startup.

A winner of a 2013 MIT Clean Energy Prize, Sistine has recently garnered significant media attention as a rising “aesthetic solar” startup. Last summer, one of its pilot projects was featured on the Lifetime television series “Designing Spaces,” where the panels blended in with the shingle roof of a log cabin in Hubbardston, Massachusetts.

In December, the startup installed its first residential SolarSkin panels, in a 10-kilowatt system that matches a cedar pattern on a house in Norwell, Massachusetts. Now, the Cambridge-based startup says it has 200 homes seeking installations, primarily in Massachusetts and California, where solar is in high demand.

“We think SolarSkin is going to catch on like wildfire,” Balasubramanian says. “There is a tremendous desire by homeowners to cut utility bills, and solar is finding reception with them — and homeowners care a lot about aesthetics.”

SolarSkin is the product of the co-founders’ unique vision, combined with MIT talent that helped make the product a reality.

Balasubramanian came to MIT Sloan in 2011, after several years in the solar-power industry, with hopes of starting his own solar-power startup — a passion shared by classmate and Sistine co-founder Ido Salama MBA ’13.

One day, the two were brainstorming at the Muddy Charles Pub, when a surprisingly overlooked issue popped up: Homeowners, they heard, don’t really like the look of solar panels. That began a nebulous business mission to “captivate people’s imaginations and connect people on an emotional level with solar,” Balasubramanian says.

Recruiting Jonathan Mailoa, then a PhD student in MIT’s Photovoltaic Research Laboratory, and Samantha Holmes, a mosaic artist trained in Italy who is still with the startup, the four designed solar panels that could be embedded on massive sculptures and other 3-D objects. They took the idea to 15.366 (Energy Ventures), where “it was drilled into our heads that you have to do a lot of market testing before you build a product,” Balasubramanian says.

That was a good thing, too, he adds, because they realized their product wasn’t scalable. “We didn’t want to make a few installations that people talk about. … We [wanted to] make solar so prevalent that within our lifetime we can see the entire world convert to 100 percent clean energy,” Balasubramanian says.

The team’s focus then shifted to manufacturing solar panels that could match building facades or street fixtures such as bus shelters and information kiosks. In 2013, the idea earned the team — then officially Sistine Solar — a modest DOE grant and a $20,000 prize from the MIT Clean Energy Prize competition, “which was a game-changer for us,” Balasubramanian says.

But, while trying to construct custom-designed panels, another idea struck: Why not just make a layer to embed into existing solar panels? Recruiting MIT mechanical engineering student Jody Fu, Sistine created the first SolarSkin prototype in 2015, leading to pilot projects for Microsoft, Starwood Hotels, and other companies in the region.

That summer, after earning another DOE grant for $1 million, Sistine recruited Anthony Occidentale, an MIT mechanical engineering student who has since helped further advance SolarSkin. “We benefited from the incredible talent at MIT,” Balasubramanian says. “Anthony is a shining example of someone who resonates with our vision and has all the tools to make this a reality.”

SolarSkin is a layer that employs selective light filtration to display an image while still transmitting light to the underlying solar cells. The ad wraps displayed on bus windows offer a good analogy: The wraps reflect some light to display an image, while allowing the remaining light through so passengers inside the bus can see out. SolarSkin achieves a similar effect — “but the innovation lies in using a minute amount of light to reflect an image [and preserve] a high-efficiency solar module,” Balasubramanian says.

To achieve this, Occidentale and others at Sistine have developed undisclosed innovations in color science and human visual perception. “We’ve come up with a process where we color-correct the minimal information we have of the image on the panels to make that image appear, to the human eye, to be similar to the surrounding backdrop of roof shingles,” Occidentale says.

As for designs, Sistine has amassed a database of common rooftop patterns in the United States, such as asphalt shingles, clay tiles, and slate, in a wide variety of colors. “So if a homeowner says, for instance, ‘We have manufactured shingles in a barkwood pattern,’ we have a matching design for that,” he says. Custom designs aren’t as popular, but test projects include commercial prints for major companies, and even Occidentale’s face on a panel.

Currently, Sistine is testing SolarSkin for efficiency, durability, and longevity at the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory under a DOE grant.

The field of aesthetic solar is still nascent, but it’s growing, with major companies such as Tesla designing entire solar-panel roofs. But, as far as Balasubramanian knows, Sistine is the only company that’s made a layer that can be integrated into any solar panel, and that can display any color as well as intricate patterns and actual images.

Companies could thus use SolarSkin solar panels to double as business signs. Municipalities could install light-powering solar panels on highways that blend in with the surrounding nature. Panels with changeable advertisements could be placed on bus shelters to charge cell phones, information kiosks, and other devices. “You can start putting solar in places you typically didn’t think of before,” Balasubramanian says. “Imagination is really the only limit with this technology.”

Source: news.mit.edu