Home Blog Page 264

Climate Change Could Wipe Out One-Third of Parasite Species by 2070

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

That we are in the midst of a mass extinction event is no secret. As climate change melts glaciers, warms oceans, and throws off weather patterns, organisms all over the planet are being pushed to their biological limits and made more vulnerable to disease.

By some estimates, 75 percent of species on the planet could disappear during the course of this extinction event, and already, animals such as frogs, marine mammals, and bees are dying off at alarming rates. Now, researchers have determined that the parasites that affect those animals are also at risk of climate change-caused extinction.

A parasite is an organism that lives in or on another organism and derives its nutrients from its host. Various types of worms and insects, such as ticks and lice, have evolved to colonize humans and other vertebrates. Many have complex life cycles that involve a number of different host species.

To understand how climate change could affect parasite populations, researchers started with the collection of 457 parasite species in the U.S. National Parasite Collection, housed at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History. They spent years tracking down where each specimen was collected in order to understand species’ geographic ranges.

Then, the researchers used that information, along with several climate models, to determine how much of the parasites’ habitats could be lost in the future. They also calculated how various species’ suitable habitats may shift if the species dispersed.

Parasites, they found, could be one of the most threatened groups of organisms on Earth. Depending on the climatic model (little change vs. worst case scenario), many parasite species lost a substantial proportion of their known range, the biggest predictor for species extinction. Fleas and ticks were hit hardest, while some types of parasites, such as lice, actually had an expanded range in some scenarios.

In total, the researchers concluded that climate change could cause the extinction of up to one-third of parasite species by 2070.

MORE THAN JUST BLOOD SUCKERS

Though we usually think of parasites as bugs that can make us sick, these creatures play an important role in the ecosystem. They can help regulate animals’ immune systems and stave off disease. By altering animals’ behavior, parasites facilitate the transition of biomass between different levels in an ecosystem.

Losing them would not only reduce the number of species on the planet, it could accelerate the loss of non-parasite species as well, according to the researchers. That could expedite the disruption of already vulnerable ecosystems, further imperiling the societies that depend upon them.

“[Slowing climate change] has a really profound impact on extinction rates, but even in the best-case scenario, we’re still looking at fairly major global changes,” explained Anna Phillips, a research zoologist, and curator of the U.S. National Parasite Collection, in a press release.

Through this study, researchers have established a clearer picture of how parasites could be threatened with extinction in the near future. What they don’t know, however, is how to conserve them.

Parasites are among the most poorly studied organisms on the planet and they “require a specialized conservation approach, tailored to their unique life history, tremendous diversity, and the complex ecosystem services they provide,” according to the study.

In an effort to enlist the help of others in this daunting task of protecting parasites, the researchers have built what they believe is the world’s first parasite conservation database, an online portal that shares what they’ve learned about the threat to each parasite species in their study. Hopefully, this information can help others in their own efforts to protect these valuable species.

Source: futurism.com

Huge Tunisian Solar Park Hopes to Provide Saharan Power to Europe

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

An enormous solar park in the Sahara could soon be exporting electricity to Europe if Tunisia’s government approves an energy company’s request to build it.

The 4.5GW mega-project planned by TuNur would pipe electricity to Malta, Italy and France using submarine cables in the grandest energy export project since the abandoned Desertec initiative.

Kevin Sara, TuNur’s chief executive said: “If European governments take the Paris accord seriously and want to meet the less than two degrees target for global warming, we need to start importing renewables.”

“60% of Europe’s primary energy is currently imported from Russia or the Middle East. Does the EU really want to be investing in infrastructure that lasts 50 years but which just enables more fossil fuel use?”

The EU is already considering awarding priority status to an underwater cable linking Tunisia with Italy, and TuNur expects construction work on a €5bn plant to begin by 2019 in southwest Tunisia.

“We would target delivering power to the European grid via Malta by 2021,” Sara said. The following year, the first of two cables to Italy could be laid, with a French connection up and running by 2024, he added.

The resulting solar complex would sprawl over an area three times the size of Manhattan, harnessing the power of the Saharan sun with several towers up to 200m tall.

These would reflect sun rays on to hundreds of thousands of parabolic mirrors, heating molten salts that would in turn boil water, generating enough steam to power turbines that could electrify two million European homes.

Source: theguardian.com

Japan’s Biomass Power Capacity Seen rowing 50% by Early 2020s

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Biomass power plants in Japan will be able to meet the electricity needs of at least 9 million households by the early 2020s, up 50% from the current level, a sign that power generation by burning wood chips and other renewable materials is catching on here.

Forty-two companies responding to a Nikkei survey sent to 45 companies, including major power providers and members of a renewable energy industry group, have a combined biomass power generation capacity of 800,000kW, and that is set to increase by 1.7 million kilowatts by 2023.

Overall biomass power generation in Japan currently stands at 3.1 million kilowatts, only about a tenth of solar power. But the figure is expected to rise at least 50% to 4.8 million kilowatts by the early 2020s, accounting for 3% or more of the country’s power consumption. Investment is seen exceeding 700 billion yen ($6.42 billion).

Higher price

The price of solar power has continued to fall under the government’s feed-in tariff program, which requires utilities to purchase power generated from renewable energy sources at fixed rates, resulting in biomass power fetching a higher price starting this year. Meanwhile, power generation costs are about the same for both types of energy.

But biomass power is not influenced by the weather and time of day the way solar energy is. Biomass energy actually produces about four times as much electricity as solar when the capacity is the same. This profitability advantage is fueling the emergence of biomass energy.

Electricity supplier eRex will set up a 50,000kW biomass plant in Okinawa Prefecture in collaboration with Okinawa Gas. The plant is to start operations in fiscal 2020, with its output to be sold to businesses and households on the prefecture’s main island. In western Japan, eRex will set up a 75,000kW biomass plant. Investment is seen totaling around 50 billion yen.

These and other steps will quintuple eRex’s total power generation capacity to 350,000kW. The company will import fuel made of palm kernel shells and other materials from Southeast Asia.

Midtier renewable energy company Renova will invest a little over 30 billion yen in Shizuoka Prefecture to open a 75,000kW biomass plant by around 2022. It plans to construct more facilities in Sendai and western Japan in collaboration with partners including Sumitomo Forestry, in an effort to raise its total power generation capacity 15-fold from the current level to more than 300,000kW.

Source: asia.nikkei.com

Enel Starts Construction of Largest Wind Farm in Peru

Photo - Illustration: Pixabay
Photo – Illustration: Pixabay

Multinational energy business Enel has announced that construction has begun on Wayra I, its first wind farm in Peru. In a statement on Monday, Enel said that construction would be via its subsidiary, Enel Green Power Peru.

The first wind turbines are currently being installed at the facility, which will have a total capacity of 132 megawatts once completed. The wind farm is located in the district of Marcona, in the Ica region, and will be Peru’s largest.

“The construction of Enel’s first wind farm in Peru furthers our presence in the country and demonstrates our strong commitment to the Peruvian renewable energy market,” Antonio Cammisecra, head of Enel Green Power, said in a statement.

“Our aim in Peru is to become the leading player in renewable energy, which we consider to be essential for a sustainable development at the local and national level,” he went on to add.

Approximately $165 million will be invested by the Enel Group in the construction of the wind farm, which is expected to enter into operation in the first half of 2018.

The facility will be made up of 42 wind turbines and be able to produce roughly 600 gigawatt hours annually. This will be equivalent to the “annual consumption needs” of more than 480,000 Peruvian homes, and will help to avoid the emission of almost 288,000 tonnes of CO2 every year.

Source: cnbc.com

Climate Change Is Making Fish Smaller

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Seafood lovers be warned. That delectable slab of seared tuna on your plate soon could become a lot smaller—and more scarce—thanks to climate change.

As ocean temperatures climb, many species of fish—tuna among them—likely will shrink, decreasing in size by as much as 30 percent, according to a new study published in the journal Global Change Biology.

The study confirms the authors’ previous research, which showed that fish won’t be able to get enough oxygen to grow if ocean waters keep heating up. Fish, as cold-blooded animals, cannot regulate their own body temperatures. When ocean waters become warmer, a fish’s metabolism accelerates, and it needs more oxygen to sustain its body functions. Fish breathe through gills, organs that extract dissolved oxygen from the water and excrete carbon dioxide.

The problem is that the gills’ surface area does not grow at the same pace as the rest of the fish’s body—and warm water contains less oxygen than cooler water. If a fish like cod grows 100 precent larger, its gills might only grow by 80 percent or less, according to the study.

Tuna, which are fast-moving and need more oxygen may shrink by as much as 30 percent, researchers said. By contrast, brown trout, which are not as active as tuna, will only decrease in body size by about 18 percent with each degree Celsius of warming.

“There is a point where the gills cannot supply enough oxygen for a larger body, so the fish just stops growing larger,” said William Cheung, director of science for the Nippon Foundation—University of British Columbia Nereus Program and a co-author of the study.

Daniel Pauly, the study’s lead author and a principal investigator with Sea Around Us, a University of British Columbia research initiative, agreed. He emphasized that “fish are constrained by their gills in the amount of oxygen they can extract from the water. This constraint manifests itself especially in big fish. With increasing temperatures, fish require more oxygen but get less.”

The researchers first posited their principle about warming waters and fish size, which they call “gill oxygen-limitation theory,” or GOLT, in a 2013 paper published in Nature Climate Change. Their conclusions were challenged by three researchers from Norway and France who claimed their models were based on “erroneous assumptions.”

Cheung and Pauly responded to the criticism “by restating both the principle upon which the 2013 study was built, and by re-computing the effect of warming on shrinkage in more detailed fashion, which increased the shrinkage,” Pauly said.

With a drop in maximum body size, potential fisheries production will decrease “and that will directly affect the fishing industry,” Cheung said. This could result in a loss of potential catch amounting to about 3.4 million metric tons for each degree Celsius of atmospheric warming, he said.

“Some parts of the world, such as in the tropics, are going to see even larger decreases,” he said. “This will have substantial impacts on the availability of fishes for people.” Scientists said that fish are already shrinking.

“We are already seeing the effects and shrinking of fishes due to warming,” Cheung said. “For example, colleagues in the UK analyzed long-term data of fish body size in the North Sea and found that fish stocks such as haddock and sole had decreased in maximum body size in the last few decades, and such shrinkage of size was significantly related to ocean warming in that region, even after correcting for the effects of fishing.”

Moreover, oxygen-starved fish may truly end up breathless. Pauly noted that oxygen deprivation is already killing fish in the U.S. and around the world. Though, he added, “Oxygen scarcity doesn’t necessarily kill fish. If it is mild, it will only reduce their growth. This is the reason why fish farmers aerate their ponds on very warm days, when the fish therein are literally gasping.”

Oxygen scarcity will affect a multitude of sea creatures, not just smaller fish, but also larger species further up the food chain. “They are affected by global warming because their prey are,” Pauly said.

“Basically, big fish eats small fish,” Cheung said. “So, changes in body size may alter food web interactions and structure, affecting ecosystem functions and services.”

Source: ecowatch.com

Commercial Operations Begin at Vietnam’s 260-MW Trung Son Hydropower Plant

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The first hydropower project in Vietnam financed by the World Bank, the US$412 million 260-MW Trung Son hydropower project, began commercial operation on Sept. 6.

The facility is located in Trung Son commune, Quan Hoa district, Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam, and according to the World Bank, it is financing $330 million of the project’s cost.

Toshiba Corp. announced yesterday that all four 65 MW Francis turbines and generators at Trung Son were online. In April, project owner Trung Son Hydropower One Member LLC under Power Generation Corp. No. 2 (EVNGENCO2), announced Unit 3 was officially energized and successfully synchronized into the national power grid.

Vietnam’s state-owned utility, Vietnam Electricity (EVN) owns EVNGENCO2.

THPC, Toshiba’s Chinese subsidiary for the manufacture, sales and maintenance of hydroelectric equipment, received the equipment supply order from EVN in Aug. 2013, as a member of a consortium with HydroChina Corp.

In June, HydroWorld.com reported districts in Vietnam’s mountainous central province of Quang Nam plan to use US$400 million from investments for infrastructure by 2030 for ginseng production and building four hydropower plants.

According to EVN, the Trung Son hydropower plant will contribute to the national power system an annual electricity generation output of 1.018 billion kWh, at the same time the plant will help control floods and irrigation in the downstream area of Ma river. The project will also create “a new driving force for economic development, hunger eradication and poverty alleviation in Quan Hoa district (Thanh Hoa province).”

EVN also said one of the objectives of the project is to mitigate and minimize social and environmental impacts caused by all construction and operation activities of the project.

Source: hydroworld.com

Solar Energy will Help Power Merida in June 2018

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

The San Ignacio Solar Energy Park, which will generate electricity to sell to the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE), will start operating in June 2018, said Manuel Mendizábal, legal representative of Solar Energy San Ignacio.

“400 million pesos will be invested to install and operate solar-panel towers in a 66-hectare plot located in front of the San Ignacio substation, on the Mérida-Progreso federal highway,” he said.

Mendizábal initially refused to report during the recess following the presentation of the Environmental Impact Manifesto (MIA) of the photovoltaic park, with the allegation that the meeting had not yet ended, and tried to evade the interview with the reporters, but finally agreed and said that the owner of the company is Jinko Solar (China).

According to him, the Solar Energy Park San Ignacio will be installed in an area of 66 hectares that were rented to a private owner.

According to the project, the photovoltaic park will generate 48,748 megawatt hours (MWh) annually.

During the day it will generate direct current, which will be converted into an alternating current in a medium voltage of 34.5 kilowatts (KW).

By means of a distribution line, this park will be interconnected to the 34.5 KW San Ignacio CFE sub-station, on the Merida-Progreso road and located 500 meters south of the same park.

There will be installed 74,800 polycrystalline of 335 watts each, which will generate 19,764 MW in direct current.

Photovoltaic modules will also be installed in structures with followers of a horizontal axis connected to inverters direct current (DC) to alternating current (AC); as well as operating and control buildings, among other facilities.

At the presentation of the MIA, at a social center on Calle 40 between 29 and 31 of the colonia Ismael Garcia, about 40 students attended from the Law Faculty of the UADY, who were brought in buses from Mérida, as well as the mayor of Progreso, José Isabel Cortés Góngora, and the delegate of Semarnat in Yucatan, Jorge Carlos Berlin Montero.

In the internet, Jinko Solar reports that it is a subsidiary of Chinese manufacturer of solar products Jinko Solar, is headquartered in Mexico City and manufactures and markets silicon wafers, cells and solar modules.

It indicates that in 2016 it signed three energy purchase agreements with the CFE for the construction of three solar power plants for a total of 188 MW-AC (megawatts of alternating current). Two of these projects will be installed in Yucatan, and the third in Jalisco.

Under the agreements, the company will generate power from mid-2018 (more than 500 GWh/year (giga-watts per hour per year)), which will be sold to the CFE over a 15-year period.

Previously, the company supplied photovoltaic modules for two projects in Mexico — 7 MW of solar modules to Sustainable Warehouse (AS Solar) and 49.8 MW to TSK Electronics and Electricity.

Source: theyucatantimes.com

There are Over 341,000 Wind Turbines on the Planet: Here’s How Much of a Difference they’re Actually Making

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

From the intense heat of the Californian desert to the green hills of Scotland, wind turbines are popping up all over the world.

Humans have been using wind energy for thousands of years. Today, its scope and scale is big and getting bigger. According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), at the end of 2016 more than 341,000 wind turbines were spinning and generating energy.

CNBC’s Sustainable Energy takes a look at the nuts and bolts of wind power – how turbines work, wind energy’s impact on the environment, and its role in the planet’s energy mix over the coming years.

With their considerable height and large blades, modern wind turbines are instantly recognizable.

How they produce energy can be broken down into several parts. Put simply, when the wind blows, a turbine’s blades turn around a rotor. As the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) explains, the rotor is connected to a main shaft, which in turn rotates a generator to produce electricity.

Wind energy can be produced both offshore and onshore. While the U.S. offshore wind industry is still in its infancy – America’s first offshore wind farm only began commercial operations last December– it is well established in other parts of the world.

According to the GWEC, at the end of last year Europe was home to 3,589 offshore wind turbines. Furthermore, almost 88 percent of the world’s offshore installations were based off the coast of 10 European countries.

The U.K. is a world leader in offshore wind, representing just shy of 36 percent of installed capacity, with Germany and China close behind.

The GWEC says that in 2016 wind power helped the planet avoid more than 637 million tonnes of CO2 emissions.

The executive director of RenewableUK explained to CNBC how wind power had several plus points when it came to the environment.

“Wind energy doesn’t require a fuel source… once we’re built we don’t need to mine for anything and we don’t need to burn fossil fuels which, as we know, are contributing to climate change,” Emma Pinchbeck said.

“It’s sustainable as a form of energy production, but then it’s also fairly sustainable as a form of infrastructure because of how we build it,” she added. “The amount of energy that goes in to building a wind farm is ‘paid off’ after one year of generation from that wind farm.”

There are some drawbacks, however. To give just one example, while the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) acknowledges that wind power has a “significant” part to play in the U.K.’s efforts against climate change, it adds that available evidence suggests that wind farms “can harm birds in three possible ways – disturbance, habitat loss and collision.”

Looking forward, the GWEC says that in the European Union, 520,000 people are expected to be working in the wind industry by 2020.

The DOE’s Wind Vision Report says that wind could potentially support more than 600,000 jobs by the year 2050 and help avoid 12.3 gigatonnes of greenhouse gases.

Unsurprisingly, RenewableUK’s Pinchbeck was incredibly positive about the future when it comes to renewables. “If I were an investor and I wanted to put my money on what the cheapest forms of energy were going to be, not just today but in ten years’ time, it would be in renewables by a country mile,” she said.

Source: cnbc.com

DS Smith Shrink-Wraps CO2 Emissions, Boosts Sourcing Standards

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Packaging giant DS Smith has managed to cut its carbon emissions per tonne of product by 6.7 per cent between 2015/6 and 2016/7 thanks to more efficient lighting, new combined heat and power plants (CHP) and better energy management.

The results, released earlier this week in the firm’s latest sustainability report, mark the first step in the company’s journey to cutting emissions per tonne of production by 30 per cent by 2030, against 2015 levels.

Although emissions reductions were driven primarily by internal efforts to cut emissions by boosting energy efficiency and switching to CHP power at its paper mills, DS Smith also admitted emissions levels from its UK operations benefited from the falling emissions intensity of the UK’s national grid, as more renewables came on-stream.

UK-headquartered DS Smith employs around 26,000 people worldwide and supplies packaging to a wide range of sectors, including online retailers and food businesses. Earlier this month it completed a giant deal to acquire US packaging company Interstate Resources for £722m.

Elsewhere in its sustainability report, the firm reported that 85 per cent of primary raw material was sourced from FSC-certified sites in 2016, up from 62 per cent in 2015.

“Whilst we are always working to reduce our environmental impact and realise the potential of our people, as a leading supplier of packaging solutions we also recognise the role we can play in helping our customers operate more sustainably,” Ian Simm, chairman of the sustainability committee at DS Smith, said in a statement. “We listen to our stakeholders, understand our impacts, assess new opportunities, and take action.”

Source: businessgreen.com

1st Utility-Scale Solar Energy Project In Navajo Nation Now Generating Enough Electricity For 13,000 Homes

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The Navajo Nation’s first utility-scale solar energy project is now generating enough electricity to provide for the needs of around 13,000 area homes, according to recent reports.

The solar photovoltaic energy installation — located in proximity to the sandstone buttes of Monument Valley, and dubbed “The Kayenta Solar Facility” — is owned by the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority and is intended to show that renewable energy projects are viable on the reservation.

Considering that the nearby coal-fired Navajo Generating Station is slated to close down in December 2019, this is important according to those involved in the project. There’s the potential for the coal-fired power plant’s site to be used for renewable energy development after the plant closes, according to various tribal and private entities.

Here’s more on the matter from Arizona Central: “Walter Haase, general manager of the tribal utility, said the plant proves to investors, developers and tribal communities that renewable energy projects are possible on the reservation. Economic development often is hampered by the lack of infrastructure, required environmental clearances and consent from anyone holding a permit or lease for use of the land.

“Before the solar facility, ‘we had a reputation in the industry of not being able to get something built or brought online,’ Haase said. The town of Kayenta benefited, too. The contractor hired and trained about 200 Navajos to build the plant, said Deenise Becenti, a spokeswoman for the tribal utility, leaving a qualified workforce for other projects.

“The tribal utility avoided passing on the $60 million cost of the solar plant to its customers through federal solar investor tax credits, said Glenn Steiger, project manager for the solar farm. A two-year power purchase and renewable energy credit agreement with the Salt River Project will cover loan repayments for the plant’s construction, Steiger said. The tribal utility is working on extending the agreement.”

While solar energy is now cost competitive in many regions, speaking in a generalized way, projects such as the one discussed above are where the potential for solar energy seems to be greatest, in my opinion. The ability to implement projects on exactly the scale needed, and in relatively “remote” regions, without a need for vast amounts of outside development help — those are certainly strong advantages.

Source: cleantechnica.com

Plastic Fibres Found in Tap Water Around the World, Study Reveals

Photo-Illustration: Pixabay
Photo-Illustration: Pixabay

Microplastic contamination has been found in tap water in countries around the world, leading to calls from scientists for urgent research on the implications for health.

Scores of tap water samples from more than a dozen nations were analysed by scientists for an investigation by Orb Media, who shared the findings with the Guardian. Overall, 83% of the samples were contaminated with plastic fibres.

The US had the highest contamination rate, at 94%, with plastic fibres found in tap water sampled at sites including Congress buildings, the US Environmental Protection Agency’s headquarters, and Trump Tower in New York. Lebanon and India had the next highest rates.

European nations including the UK, Germany and France had the lowest contamination rate, but this was still 72%. The average number of fibres found in each 500ml sample ranged from 4.8 in the US to 1.9 in Europe.

The new analyses indicate the ubiquitous extent of microplastic contamination in the global environment. Previous work has been largely focused on plastic pollution in the oceans, which suggests people are eating microplastics via contaminated seafood.

“We have enough data from looking at wildlife, and the impacts that it’s having on wildlife, to be concerned,” said Dr Sherri Mason, a microplastic expert at the State University of New York in Fredonia, who supervised the analyses for Orb. “If it’s impacting [wildlife], then how do we think that it’s not going to somehow impact us?”

A separate small study in the Republic of Ireland released in June also found microplastic contamination in a handful of tap water and well samples. “We don’t know what the [health] impact is and for that reason we should follow the precautionary principle and put enough effort into it now, immediately, so we can find out what the real risks are,” said Dr Anne Marie Mahon at the Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, who conducted the research.

Mahon said there were two principal concerns: very small plastic particles and the chemicals or pathogens that microplastics can harbour. “If the fibres are there, it is possible that the nanoparticles are there too that we can’t measure,” she said. “Once they are in the nanometre range they can really penetrate a cell and that means they can penetrate organs, and that would be worrying.” The Orb analyses caught particles of more than 2.5 microns in size, 2,500 times bigger than a nanometre.

Microplastics can attract bacteria found in sewage, Mahon said: “Some studies have shown there are more harmful pathogens on microplastics downstream of wastewater treatment plants.”

Tap water is widely contaminated by plastic

Microplastics are also known to contain and absorb toxic chemicals and research on wild animals shows they are released in the body. Prof Richard Thompson, at Plymouth University, UK, told Orb: “It became clear very early on that the plastic would release those chemicals and that actually, the conditions in the gut would facilitate really quite rapid release.” His research has shown microplastics are found in a third of fish caught in the UK.

The scale of global microplastic contamination is only starting to become clear, with studies in Germany finding fibres and fragments in all of the 24 beer brands they tested, as well as in honey and sugar. In Paris in 2015, researchers discovered microplastic falling from the air, which they estimated deposits three to 10 tonnes of fibres on the city each year, and that it was also present in the air in people’s homes.

This research led Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at King’s College London, to tell a UK parliamentary inquiry in 2016: “If we breathe them in they could potentially deliver chemicals to the lower parts of our lungs and maybe even across into our circulation.” Having seen the Orb data, Kelly told the Guardian that research is urgently needed to determine whether ingesting plastic particles is a health risk.

The new research tested 159 samples using a standard technique to eliminate contamination from other sources and was performed at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. The samples came from across the world, including from Uganda, Ecuador and Indonesia.

How microplastics end up in drinking water is for now a mystery, but the atmosphere is one obvious source, with fibres shed by the everyday wear and tear of clothes and carpets. Tumble dryers are another potential source, with almost 80% of US households having dryers that usually vent to the open air.

“We really think that the lakes [and other water bodies] can be contaminated by cumulative atmospheric inputs,” said Johnny Gasperi, at the University Paris-Est Créteil, who did the Paris studies. “What we observed in Paris tends to demonstrate that a huge amount of fibres are present in atmospheric fallout.”

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Plastic fibres may also be flushed into water systems, with a recent study finding that each cycle of a washing machine could release 700,000 fibres into the environment. Rains could also sweep up microplastic pollution, which could explain why the household wells used in Indonesia were found to be contaminated.

In Beirut, Lebanon, the water supply comes from natural springs but 94% of the samples were contaminated. “This research only scratches the surface, but it seems to be a very itchy one,” said Hussam Hawwa, at the environmental consultancy Difaf, which collected samples for Orb.

How microplastics end up in drinking water is, for now, a mystery, but the atmosphere is one obvious source, with fibres shed by the everyday wear and tear of clothes and carpets. Tumble dryers are another potential source, with almost 80% of US households having dryers that usually vent to the open air.

“We really think that the lakes [and other water bodies] can be contaminated by cumulative atmospheric inputs,” said Johnny Gasperi, at the University Paris-Est Créteil, who did the Paris studies. “What we observed in Paris tends to demonstrate that a huge amount of fibres are present in atmospheric fallout.”

Plastic fibres may also be flushed into water systems, with a recent study finding that each cycle of a washing machine could release 700,000 fibres into the environment. Rains could also sweep up microplastic pollution, which could explain why the household wells used in Indonesia were found to be contaminated.

In Beirut, Lebanon, the water supply comes from natural springs but 94% of the samples were contaminated. “This research only scratches the surface, but it seems to be a very itchy one,” said Hussam Hawwa, at the environmental consultancy Difaf, which collected samples for Orb.

Source: theguardian.com

Households Allowed to Sell Solar Power

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The government will end the decade-long restriction on households and commercial buildings selling power generated by their solar rooftops to state utilities in the fourth quarter of the year.

Deregulation will open the door for detached houses, warehouses, factories and offices to sell their leftover capacity to the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (Egat).

The buying rate is being fixed at below 2.6 baht per kilowatt-hour, according to the Energy Ministry. At present, private actors are allowed to sell power to Egat through auctions under the small power producer (SPP) or very small power producer (VSPP) project.

Energy Minister Anantaporn Karnchanarat said the government is considering granting licences to residents and building owners.

The total capacity to be allowed, however, has yet to be finalised. The licences and deregulation come after the previous solar deregulation project was scrapped when the military government came into power.

Gen Anantaporn said this could be another opportunity to let other solar-related businesses grow. Initially, the purchasing rate that the state utilities will pay for surplus solar power from residents will be below 2.6 baht per kilowatt-hour, which is less than Egat charges for the fossil-based power it sells to consumers at about four baht per kilowatt-hour, he said.

The Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency has been appointed to set up details and conditions for granting licences and the process to buy back power from the residents.

Gen Anantaporn said policymakers need to deliberate over details because there are several types of solar rooftop and different technologies – resulting in different sizes of solar rooftop projects at different power costs – before figuring out the regulation and licensing process.

Prasert Sinsukprasert, deputy director-general of the Energy Policy and Planning Office, said the regulations should be approved by October.

The Energy Ministry had assigned Chulalongkorn University’s Energy Research Institute (ERI) the task of conducting a feasibility study of the plan. The ERI found that the deregulation of solar rooftops and letting people generate their own power would create minimal revenue losses for state utilities.

ERI researcher Sopitsuda Tongsopit said solar rooftops are expected to have a minimal effect on state utilities in generating backup power, as total power-generating capacity for solar remains small compared with the overall amount of electricity in the country’s power supply system.

Thailand has 2,990 megawatts of solar power installed. Some 2,960MW, as of July, is from solar farms, while an additional 130MW is from rooftops.

Source: bangkokpost.com

Better Energy Efficiency Measures Could Cut UK Costs by £7.5bn

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

More efficient use of energy in the UK would save as much power as could be generated by six new nuclear reactors and shave £7.5bn from energy costs, experts have calculated.

But to achieve such savings would require substantial changes to government policy because there are few incentives for households to carry out the necessary measures, such as insulation, which can take 20 years to pay for themselves via bill savings.

About a quarter of current energy use in heating and electricity could be cut in a “cost-effective” manner producing savings overall in terms of bills, according to the UK Energy Research Centre. Households would save about £270 a year on bills, and more through less tangible improvements such as healthier lifestyles from warmer homes and better air quality.

A further quarter of current domestic energy use could also be cut – reducing the UK’s domestic energy consumption by half, or as much as could be generated by 12 new nuclear reactors the size of Hinkley Point C – but this would require investment, for instance in solid wall insulation, heat pumps and demand management technology, which would be less likely to be repaid in bill savings within 20 years.

Cutting energy use would also reduce carbon dioxide emissions – which have an effect on climate change – and improve quality of life for many by warming homes and reducing air pollution connected to energy generation.

Profit margins at the six biggest energy suppliers, which control most of the UK market, have risen to record levels, the regulator Ofgem said last month. British Gas announced it was raising its prices by more than 12 per cent on some tariffs over the summer.

Current government policy provides few incentives to households to invest in energy-saving measures since the flagship Green Deal policy, providing loans for such improvements, was axed by the last government. However, many households have continued to take measures facilitated by improved technology such as more efficient boilers and low-energy lightbulbs and other appliances. In 2015, according to the report, the average annual energy bill for a dual-fuel household was £490 less than it would have been without such efficiencies.

The use of gas, mostly for heating, has dropped by 27 per cent since 2004, and the use of electricity by households fell 13 per cent in the same period, according to the report entitled Unlocking Britain’s First Fuel.

Jan Rosenow, senior research fellow at the University of Sussex, said many of the potential future improvements were “unlikely to happen” without policy changes.

However, energy bills have continued to rise in real terms to about £1,110 a year, according to the study, in part because of higher fuel costs. If all the possible improvements outlined in the report were made, bills could drop to £560 a year.

Fabrice Leveque, an energy specialist at the environmental charity WWF, said: “This is yet more evidence that a zero-carbon future is in our grasp. However, at the present rate it will take over 100 years for us to ensure our homes are carbon neutral. This is clearly not good enough, and the government must stop dragging its feet and make sure more homes are renovated each year. Our cold and leaky homes pile hundreds of pounds on to people’s fuel bills, can damage their health, and are adding to climate change.”

The UKERC study came amid warnings that millions of customers could end up paying substantially more for their energy as some special tariffs are phased out by suppliers at the end of this month. Households could end up paying more than £400 extra if they fail to switch when they are automatically moved off these special deals and on to standard tariffs. Mark Todd, founder of Energyhelpline, said his company had identified 42 tariffs from 14 suppliers that were due to finish by October.

Separately, Uswitch.com found that one in five households fail to submit regular meter readings, meaning many of them could be paying more than necessary.

Source: businessgreen.com

FCO Climate Headcount Down 60 Per Cent Since 2011, FOI Reveals

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The number of UK-based diplomats working on climate change issues for the UK government has fallen dramatically over the last six years, new Freedom of Information data released publicly earlier this week has revealed.

The total number of Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) staff in the UK working on climate change and energy issues has dropped 60 per cent between March 2011 and January 2017, from 554 to 221.

The number of full time staff working solely on climate change and energy within the FCO in the UK has dropped from 54 to 22 over the period, while numbers of other staff working part time in the area has fallen steadily from 500 in March 2011 to 199 in January 2017.

As of January 2017, there were an additional 112 staff members stationed overseas engaged in climate and energy work for the UK government. Comparative figures for 2011 were not provided.

The UK plays a key role in international climate diplomacy, and is particularly well regarded for its efforts to secure consensus for the Paris Agreement, which was struck in December 2015 and entered force last year.

Releasing the data, the government stressed its work on climate change spans the work of multiple departments – notably Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). It also said climate change and energy work is a “network-wide priority” that engages staff at all levels of government.

It also pointed out that when counting the number of UK-based staff working on the issue it has not included “locally engaged members of staff” – arguing that the 221 figure therefore “significantly under-represents” the full scale of the FCO’s climate activity.

The data falls against a backdrop of continuing government austerity as ministers battle to meet ambitious spending targets set out by the former chancellor George Osborne in 2015.

Other areas of government also appear to be axeing climate jobs as austerity programmes bite – a DeSmog investigation last year suggested more than half of local governments across England have cut the number of staff working in climate and sustainability positions since 2011. Many areas, including the cities Southampton and Nottingham, no longer have any staff working on directly on the issue, according to the 2016 data.

Across the Atlantic, the Trump administration is making headway in its quest to cut the headcount of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Nearly 400 workers have left the agency since the end of August, the department said in a release on Tuesday, cutting the agency’s staffing numbers by 2.5 per cent in less than a week.

“We’re giving long-serving, hardworking employees the opportunity to retire early,” EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said in a statement. “We’re proud to report that we’re reducing the size of government, protecting taxpayer dollars and staying true to our core mission of protecting the environment and American jobs.”

Trump made rolling back the powers of the EPA a key plank of his agenda on entering the White House last year, as part of a wider strategy to unpick Obama-era policies to protect the environment and tackle global warming.

But the wave of departures – which could soon see the EPA headcount cut to 1998 levels – has sparked fears the agency may struggle to fulfil its core duties of ensuring compliance with US environmental law.

Source: businessgreen.com

France Plans to Ban Fossil Fuel Production

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Unprecedented and “never-before-seen” impacts of climate change are all around us. From Hurricanes’ Harvey and Irma to massive flooding in India, Bangladesh, and Nepal to forest fires burning through the west coast of North America—climate change is here and now, and it is catastrophic.

Fortunately, unprecedented and never-before-seen climate policy is also starting to take hold. While the devastating impacts of climate change demand a rapid response and emergency support, the true measure of political commitment is how far governments will go to stop digging us deeper into this hole.

Today, France (including overseas territories) is positioning itself to become the first country to ban all exploration permits and renewals for unconventional fuels as well as banning the conversion of exploration permits into production permits.

We know that we already have enough oil, coal and gas in already producing fields to take us past 2 degrees C of global warming. It is only logical that we put an end to exploration for and expansion of fossil fuels we don’t want or need.

In the legislation, that will be debated in October, the French government is taking climate action to another level. They are recognizing that climate leadership in the 21st century is about more than reducing emissions, pricing carbon and improving efficiency. It must also be about keeping fossil fuels that the climate cannot afford in the ground.

The legislation is not perfect, it does not include coal bed methane in its definition of unconventionals for example. The government should also take away existing licenses which have seen no investment.

But it does provide a new starting line for rich, northern countries that have the means to be first movers. And while France is not home to massive fossil fuel reserves, like other oil importers it faces political and economic pressures to reduce those imports by developing its own oil. So this move should not be underestimated in its precedent-setting nature.

With the Paris Climate Agreement as a defining moment for the world, the French government is wise to keep its name synonymous with policies that take us in the right direction.

This is the cutting edge of climate action, and with governments the world over being confronted with incredible people power, relentless climate impacts, and defining science, it shouldn’t be long before more join the enlightened list of countries that understand where we must go.

Source: ecowatch.com

Amsterdam Energy Consumption Falling Significantly, Renewables Production Lagging Behind

Foto - ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The Dutch city of Amsterdam is making substantial progress towards a wide range of sustainability goals, most notably regarding overall energy consumption.

According to the latest of the city’s annual sustainability report, overall energy production per capita declined by 9% compared to 2013, and 5% compared to 2015. If this trend is to continue, the city’s goal of a 20% reduction from benchmark year 2013 is in sight. A wide range of policies have been contributing to this result, ranging from educating citizens on how energy savings can be achieved to offering financing options for housing insulation. Another noteworthy policy has been the enforcement of a Dutch law that obliges companies to undertake energy efficiency improvements with payback times of fewer than 5 years.

Besides reduced energy consumption, the city has also improved sustainability on the supply side, but it is questionable to what degree progress has been sufficient. From 2013 to 2016, renewable energy generation increased by a meager 3.3%, which falls short of the population growth for that time frame. As the city itself is only expected to attract more residents in the years ahead, Amsterdam will have to seriously step up its efforts in order to meet its sustainability target of a 20% increase in renewables per capita by 2020 compared to 2013.

Solace could come from developments in the solar market. Compared to 2013, total installed solar capacity has almost tripled, and year-on-year growth rates have been consistently spectacular for the past decade. Unfortunately, total installed capacity topped only 24 MW in 2016, meaning that even on this swift exponential growth trajectory, we are still years away from significant carbon footprint reductions.

Another reason renewable energy generation is sluggish is that several wind energy projects took more time to develop, and others got cancelled. The underlying problem is a lack of space, or at least a lack of political will to allocate space to wind on land. The not-in-my-backyard problem is hard to crack in a country where backyards are everywhere and each inch of land is highly valued.

Source: cleantechnica.com