Home Blog Page 255

Pentagon: Half Of US Military Sites Threatened By Climate Change

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Roughly half of the military sites maintained by the US are now threatened by climate change and associated effects, according to a new study from the Pentagon.

To be more specific, flooding, drought, storms, and more climate disruption now endanger the operations of a large portion of the US military’s 3,500 (very expensive to maintain and operate) installations around the world, according to the US Department of Defense.

This reality of course runs contrary to the “official” sideshow that has constituted US politics for the last few decades.

The report stated: “Changes in climate can potentially shape the environment in which we operate and the missions we are required to do. … If extreme weather makes our critical facilities unusable or necessitate costly or manpower-intensive workarounds, that is an unacceptable impact.”

The coverage from Reuters continues: “The findings put the military at odds with US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly cast doubt on mainstream scientific findings about climate change, including this week during an interview on British television.

“The Pentagon survey investigated the effects of ‘a changing climate’ on all US military installations worldwide, which it said numbered more than 3,500. Assets most often damaged include airfields, energy infrastructure, and water systems, according to military personnel at each site, who responded to the DoD questionnaire.”

Expect to see more and more of that as the years move on by.

The new report was published last week, and given a public spotlight by the Center for Climate and Security — obviously, with the intent being to spur public discussion.

Source: cleantechnica.com

More Americans Are Working From Home — And It’s Better for the Environment

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

There’s no doubting the transformative power of technology. Advances in tech have led to new and improved entertainment experiences, from allowing us to stream our favorite shows on-demand to immersing us in virtual worlds. They’re changing how we earn a living by making it easier to work remotely, and now, instead of going out to buy stuff, we shop online. Americans are staying home more, and according to a new study, that lifestyle change is affecting energy consumption.

For the study, which was published in the journal Joule, researchers from the University of Texas at Austin and the Rochester Institute of Technology analyzed 2003 to 2012 data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), a U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics survey that compiles information on the daily schedules of some 11,000 Americans.

The researchers found that Americans are staying home an average of eight days more in 2012 than in 2003. Conversely, by spending more time at home, Americans spent less time traveling (1.2 days) and staying in non-residential buildings or areas (6.7 days) in 2012 compared to 2003.

The age of the survey respondents affected the time they spent at home, according to the researchers’ analysis. People between the ages of 18 and 24 spent an average of two weeks more at home in 2012 compared to 2002, a change that was 70 percent higher than the rest of the population.

As for what they were doing at home, most people spent their time working, watching videos, and using computers. At the same time, people also spent more time doing the “essentials,” such as sleeping, preparing meals, and eating.

The researchers didn’t simply focus on the fact that Americans are staying home more, though — they also looked at how that lifestyle change affected energy consumption. What they found surprised them: staying at home decreased the average national demand for energy by an estimated 1,700 trillion BTU in 2012. That’s equivalent to about 1.8 percent the total national energy demand for the year.

“We did expect to see net energy decrease, but we had no idea of the magnitude,” said lead researcher Ashok Sekar from the University of Texas at Austin in a news release.

Let’s put that 1.8 percent or 1,700 trillion BTU into perspective.

As Sekar told Futurism, that amount of energy is approximately equivalent to the state of Kentucky’s total energy consumption in 2015. It’s most than what Connecticut, Hawaii, and Nevada combined consumed that same year, and it’s nearly half the total energy consumed by the state of New York in 2015.

“You could also compare [it with the] annual energy use of a car,” co-author Eric Williams told Futurism. “1,700 trillion BTU is equivalent to 30 million cars’ worth of gasoline usage over a year.”

This change in lifestyle could have a noticeable environmental impact.

If Americans are staying home more often, that means they are consuming less fuel for transportation, which remains one of the biggest contributors of greenhouse gasses. In 2015, around 27 percent of carbon emissions in the U.S. came from transportation, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Presumably, that number could’ve been higher had technology not made it possible for Americans to work or shop remotely.

The team did note that their study doesn’t account for variances in location, labor markets, or demographics that could impact activities and, therefore, emissions.

“The trend we report in the study is for the average population,” Sekar told Futurism. “The results can vary very much between people living in urban versus rural areas. [For example], people living in the city may use public transportation which has relatively much less energy consumption than people driving their cars.”

The team’s study makes one thing clear, though: technology does influence lifestyle and that influence is currently decreasing energy consumption. If the shift in habits and lifestyle continues on its current trajectory, it could play a significant role in the fight against climate change, right alongside decreased fossil fuel consumption and increased usage of clean energy alternatives.

Source: Futurism

‘The Beginning of the End of Coal’: Chile Unveils Coal Phase Out Plan

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The global push to phase out unabated coal power chalked up a major victory this week, as Chile announced it would ban the development of new coal power plants without carbon capture and storage (CCS) and begin work on a plan to phase out its existing coal capacity.

The country’s Energy Ministry and the power sector trade body Asociación de Generadoras released statements yesterday confirming an agreement had been reached to phase out unabated coal power in the country.

The companies, which include global players such as AES, Enel, and Engie, have committed to ending the development of new coal plants. At the same time they will form a working group alongside the government to explore how to phase out existing coal plants and meet the government’s target of sourcing 70 per cent of Chile’s power from renewables by 2050.

Power auctions in Chile have delivered some of the lowest cost renewables projects in the world and the statement from the trade body stressed that the new plan was driven by the changing economics in the energy industry.

“Thanks to significant reduction in costs and the massification of renewable generation technologies that have been incorporated into our [energy] matrix, the electricity generation industry sees an increasingly renewable future, where thermoelectric generation will no longer be the main source of energy and, together with hydroelectricity, other renewable technologies and storage, will complement variable solar photovoltaic and wind generation during the absence of sunlight or wind,” the statement read.

Writing on Twitter, Chile’s environment minister Marcelo Mena said the new plan was “the beginning of the end of coal”.

The move represents a major victory for the Powering Past Coal Alliance, which was launched last year by the UK and Canada, and has seen 24 countries, eight regions, and 24 corporates commit to phasing out coal.

The campaign has faced criticism in some quarters for primarily attracting support from countries such as the UK and France, which either have minimal reliance on coal power or are already well advanced in their plans to phase out its use.

However, Chile remains reliant on coal for between 35 per cent and 40 per cent of its power, meaning the new goal is likely to make a sizeable dent in the country’s carbon emissions.

Source: businessgreen.com

Public Support for Renewables Climbs to 79 Per Cent

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Public support for renewables has climbed year-on-year, according to the latest government survey on attitudes to energy and climate issues.

Asked if they supported or opposed the use of renewable energy, 49 per cent of respondent said they supported it and 30 per cent said they strongly supported its use.

The result represents a slight drop on the 82 per cent support recorded in the last round of the quarterly tracker poll, although it support climbed year-on-year from 74 per cent to 79 per cent.

Opposition to renewables continued to be confined to a small minority. Just three per cent said they opposed its use, while once per cent said they were strongly opposed.

The wider results from the latest poll of just over 2,000 people revealed minimal changes in attitudes.

Support for nuclear energy remained solid with 34 per cent supportive of the technology and 22 per cent opposed.

Meanwhile, opposition to shale gas extraction continued to outstrip support, with 32 per cent opposed and only 16 per cent in favour.

The survey also confirmed that only 24 per cent of people claim to have given a lot of thought to saving energy at home, with 50 per cent claiming to have given the issue a fair amount of thought.

Similarly, the survey underlined the challenges faced by the renewable heat sector.

Although 65 per cent of people claimed to be aware of renewable heating technologies, only three per cent had a renewable heating system installed in their home.

“Moreover, only a small proportion of those without these systems were likely to install them in their home,” the report added. “Seven per cent were likely to install solar thermal panels, two per cent a biomass boiler, two per cent an air source heat pump and one per cent a ground source heat pump.”

Amongst those who were unlikely to install renewable heating systems, the most common reasons given were concerns over cost and the difficulty of installing such technologies in rented properties.

Source: businessgreen.com

Harvard Study: Green Buildings Deliver Nearly $6bn in Health and Climate Benefits

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Green certified buildings are delivering billions of dollars in health, climate and energy-saving benefits, according to a major new study from Harvard University.

Engineering giant United Technologies Corporation (UTC) commissioned a team of researchers at the university to study how LEED certified buildings had performed over a 16 year period in six key markets: the US, China, India, Brazil and Germany.

The final peer-reviewed report, which was published in Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, concluded that the green buildings studied had delivered $7.5bn in energy savings.

However, it also detailed how the buildings had delivered a further $4.4bn in public health benefits through fewer deaths, hospital visits, and respiratory issues. And a further $1.4bn of benefits were documented as a result of reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

The report estimated that for every $1 of energy cost savings delivered by green buildings a further $0.77 of health and climate benefits were recorded.

“Considering that the buildings studied included only LEED certified buildings, which are approximately one-third of the global green building stock, total benefits worldwide would be even greater,” the report added.

Dr. Joseph Allen, assistant professor of exposure assessment science and director of the Healthy Buildings program at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said the study provided further evidence of the wide-ranging benefits associated with green buildings.

“The energy savings of green buildings come with a massive public health benefit through associated reductions in air pollutants emitted,” he said in a statement. “We developed the Co-benefits of the Built Environment (CoBE) calculator in this study as a tool that people can use for understanding the health impacts of building portfolios, investments and building strategies. The decisions we make today with regard to buildings will determine our current and future health.”

John Mandyck, chief sustainability officer at United Technologies, said he hoped the research would help accelerate the roll out of greener buildings.

“Green buildings are designed to save energy and water while promoting healthy indoor environments,” he said. “Now we know the reduced environmental impact of building green is amplified with quantifiable benefits to public health and climate resilience. With this new human context, we can accelerate the green building movement globally from this groundbreaking research.”

The research builds on a previous Harvard study, which in 2015 explored how the brain’s cognitive function was impacted by poor office environments. It showed 101 per cent improvement in cognitive function test scores when workers spent time in an office with high ventilation, low CO2 and low volatile organic compounds, compared to when they were in a “conventional” office environment.

A follow up study in 2016 found that workers in green-certified buildings scored 26 per cent higher on cognitive function tests, reported 30 per cent fewer sick building symptoms and recorded six per cent higher sleep quality scores.

Source: businessgreen.com

Spanish Energy Regulator Rejects Government Push For Coal Power Subsidies

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The US is not the only country where powerful coal interests are pressuring the government to give favorable treatment to coal fired electrical generating plants. Spain has a long history of burning coal to make electricity, much of it mined domestically. Recently, the Spanish government announced support for policies that would encourage utility companies to continue using coal fired plants far into the future on the pretext that they are needed to ensure the country has an adequate supply of electricity.

If that argument sounds familiar, it is because Rick Perry, head of the US Department of Energy, is making similar claims in an effort to favor US coal-fired generating plants. “Disparates,” said Spain’s Comisión Nacional de Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC), the energy regulator for the country, last week. The ruling comes as two major utility companies, Iberdrola and Endesa, are charting different courses with regard to keeping their remaining coal fired plants open.

Iberdrola wants to close its last two coal generating stations but last fall the Spanish government issued a “royal decree” that would allow it to overrule any decision to shutter a coal plant. The government claimed that coal is essential to meeting Spain’s energy needs in the future. Quite the contrary, says the CNMC ruling. “The Spanish electricity system will not have problems of security of supply in the medium nor the long term. (Even) in the worst scenario with demand peaking at 46,000 MW and low generation, a significant part of the existing coal capacity could be safely discarded.”

Endesa has made plans to spend €400 million to upgrade three coal plants it owns to keep them running beyond 2030. Oddly enough, Endesa is owned by Enel, the giant utility company headquartered in Italy that is moving aggressively into renewable energy. Endesa claims keeping its coal plants online is essential to Spain’s “energy security.” It is probably no coincidence that the same phrase is prominent in Rick Perry’s rhetoric. Fossil fuel companies are global and their owners share strategies to protect their investments whenever possible.

The decision by CNMC is being applauded by environmental group Instituto Internacional de Derecho y Medio Ambiente (IIDMA) and the Institute For Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). The IIDMA published its objection to the royal decree last fall, arguing that is was illegal under both Spanish and European Union law. IEEFA claims Spain has an oversupply of electricity of 30%, meaning it has nearly a third more capacity than it needs. Even if all existing coal generating stations were shuttered, there is more than enough generating capacity to safely meet the country’s needs.

The energy regulator says, in effect, that Spanish utility customers have already paid more than enough for electricity from coal and that it is time to channel future investments into renewables — the energy of the future — rather than coal — the energy of the past.

Source: cleantechnica.com

World’s First Biofuel Flight Between the US and Australia Powered by Mustard Seeds

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The world’s first biofuel flight between the United States and Australia landed in Melbourne after a 15-hour trip. The Guardian reported the blended fuel was 10 percent derived from brassica carinat, which Qantas describes as a “non-food, industrial type of mustard seed.” They said the use of blended biofuel in the flight would save about 18,000 kilograms, or around 39,683 pounds, of carbon emissions.

A Boeing Dreamliner 787-9 soared between Los Angeles and Melbourne in the trans-Pacific biofuel flight. The trip saw carbon emissions reduced by seven percent compared against Qantas’ usual flight over the route. Per the airline, “Across its lifecycle, using carinata-derived biofuel can reduce carbon emissions by 80 percent compared to traditional jet fuel.”

Brassica carinata works as a fallow crop, meaning it can be cultivated between regular crop cycles, per The Guardian. Qantas said the crop can be sown in fallow areas, and is water efficient.

Steve Fabijanski, CEO of Agrisoma, the agricultural-technology company behind the crop, said in a statement, “Biojet fuel made from carinata delivers both oil for biofuel and protein for animal nutrition while also enhancing the soil it’s grown in.” The crushed seeds can produce a high-protein meal for livestock, poultry, and dairy markets, according to Qantas.

One hectare of the seed yields 2,000 liters, around 528 gallons, of oil, according to Qantas. That can produce 400 liters, or around 106 gallons, of biofuel, and 1,400 liters, around 370 gallons, of what the airline described as renewable diesel.

University of Sydney agriculture expert Daniel Tan told The Guardian farmers can use mustard seeds as a source of sustainable fuel, saying, “Almost within a day after harvesting, they can press the oil out in their own shed and use it straight into their tractors.” Field trials have shown the crop should do well in Australia’s climate.

Source: inhabitat.com

From a Family Manufacture to a Reputable European Company

Photo: Marko Obradovic Edge

For a quarter of a century, as long as this company exists, we have managed to do some incredible things. We turned a small family business that produces accessories made of metal to a big company with more than 120 employees. Our main area of expertise is POS (Point Of Sale), POP (Point Of Promotion) and POSM (Point Of Sale Material) design and development. We started in one industry and soon we spread to 7 more (Tobacco Industry, Pharmaceutical Industry, IT Industry, Automobile Industry, Banking & Insurance Industry, FMCG Industry, Building Industry), and at the same time upgraded the professional level of our team of mechanical and electric engineers, industrial and graphic designers. We also formed R&D team of people with a very particular set of skills.

During the development of our company we have formed 13 sectors:

  • Research & Development
  • Industrial Design
  • Engineering Development
  • Processing of Non-ferrous Metal
  • Black Metal Processing, Metal Plate Processing,
  • Non-Metal Plates Processing
  • Wood & Plastic Processing
  • Surface Protection Sector
  • Powder Coating & Paint
  • Digital Printing Sector
  • Multimedia & Electronics Sector
  • Branding & Packaging Sector
  • Logistics & Transport Sector
  • Quality Control Sector

We have also made progress in the other way, by increasing the number of countries with which we operate. In the beginning, we only did business with two countries, and later that figure rose to more than 17 countries and it continues to grow.

Constant progress and expansion of the activities within which we operate led to a very successful cooperation in August 2017. Namely, we implemented a project in cooperation with ProCredit Bank, which is not only important for our company, but for our city and state as well, as it significantly affects the raising of environmental awareness in the community. We have designed, built and installed a unique carport with solar panels and an electric car charger and in that way be became a part of a family of innovative companies that follow the world trends and actively participate in the development of the network of electric chargers in Serbia. This unique project, as the first in a row, thanks to the cooperation with MT-KOMEX.

If you visit the administrative building of ProCredit Bank in the Boulevard of Milutin Milanković, you can see our carport for 2 vehicles with Schneider Electric chargers that enable quick and easy charging. The installed chargers are registered on all European maps of charging stations for electric vehicles.

Photo: Marko Obradovic Edge

Of course, when you come to visit us in order to see our production capacities and be sure of the possibility of cooperation to mutual satisfaction, at the parking lot in front of our administrative building you will be able to see installed carport with solar panels with the installed capacity of 10 kW and a Schneider Electric charger for your car.

For more information go to:

http://propulzija.com

office@propulzija.com

+381 11 8001 497

This content was originally published in the eighth issue of the Energy Portal Magazine ECOHEALTH, in November 2017.

Ryanair Makes Pledge to Become ‘Plastic Free’ on All Flights by 2023

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Ryanair has pledged to become “plastic free” in the next five years, with the airline set to trumpet its relative green credentials as part of its ongoing makeover.

The Ryanair chief executive, Michael O’Leary, has famously suggested shooting environmentalists, and repeatedly denies climate change is driven by carbon emissions, which aviation produces in abundance.

However, Ryanair has promised to eliminate nonrecyclable plastics from its operations by 2023. It will also introduce a voluntary carbon offset payment for customers when booking.

As well as switching to biodegradable cups, wooden cutlery and paper packaging onboard, Ryanair said it would make its head offices, bases and operations plastic free.

The move comes the day after Ryanair formally agreed to recognise the pilots union Balpa in the UK, and will form the centrepiece of the fifth year of what it terms its “customer experience improvement programme”, or being nicer.

The chief marketing officer, Kenny Jacobs, said Ryanair’s environmental plan “includes our commitment to eliminate all nonrecyclable plastics from our operations over the next five years”.

He suggested customers could bring their own cups aboard, but added: “It’s not just inflight food and drink. We’re looking at the plastic parts within the aircraft and what’s nonrecylable and how do we work with the original equipment manufacturers to move to more recyclable plastics within the aircraft and the operation.”

But he admitted: “There will always be some kind of plastics … How far we get in terms of the 100% removal of nonrecyclable plastics we will see over the coming five years.”

He claimed Ryanair was already the greenest airline, in terms of carbon emissions per passenger, as 96% of seats were now filled on its modern, fuel-efficient fleet of 737s.

Ryanair will also make it easier for passengers to claim compensation when flights are delayed or cancelled.

The Irish airline was reprimanded by the UK regulator, the CAA, during its recent rostering crisis for not properly informing passengers of their rights under European law, while many consumers have experienced difficulties in seeking compensation.

Jacobs said it would improve ways to alert passengers about disruption and tell them how to file an EU261 claim. “We will make it easier to make a claim and if it is valid we will process it and pay within 10 days.”

Claims processing, which had been outsourced to call centres in Hungary and Romania, will now be done by a dedicated, 50-strong in-house team in Madrid.

Jacobs said the move came in spite of the airline’s continued opposition to the EU261 regime, which he said meant customers often claimed far more than they had paid for a flight with Ryanair. He said Ryanair had paid out more than £25m when it cancelled flights affecting about 700,000 passengers from last September.

About 50% of passengers entitled to compensation make a claim. Jacobs said Ryanair was considering whether some payouts, possibly limited to fare refunds, could be automatic.

Ryanair is also launching a John Lewis-style price promise whereby any passenger finding a cheaper fare will have the difference plus £5 refunded. As the comparison is limited to flights between the same airports within two hours, Jacobs could not specify how many could be eligible.

The airline is also planning to sell flights later this year with a Brexit refund clause unless an agreement is formalised to allow flights to continue between Britain and Europe.

Although Jacobs said he now expected an interim solution, he said tickets available from September to depart after 31 March 2019 would go “on sale subject to the regulatory environment allowing”.

Source: Guardian

Energy for Londoners: Mayor Powers Up £34m Solar and Energy Efficiency Plan

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Mayor Sadiq Khan officially launched the latest phase of the Energy for Londoners initiative yesterday, detailing plans to invest £34m in a range of new services and programmes designed to boost energy efficiency and improve access to clean power across the capital.

Khan announced that a new £2.5m package would help address fuel poverty across the capital, offering households up to £4,000 in Warmer Home grants to fund improvements such as new boilers, heating controls and insulation.

In addition, new funding is to be made available to help London Boroughs refer people who are in fuel poverty to services that can help them reduce their energy use and curb their bills.

“It’s a sad fact that for many Londoners keeping their homes warm during the cold winter months is a luxury they simply cannot afford,” Khan said in a statement. “My Energy for Londoners scheme aims to help those most in need with grants for new boilers, windows and home insulation to help cut fuel bills. I’m also working on a number of ambitious projects to generate more local clean energy to power our homes, businesses and communities.”

The Mayor’s Office said these new projects included plans for a new whole-house ‘eco refurbishments’ initiative, which would pilot extensive green upgrades to 10 homes; a £10m commercial boiler scrappage scheme which will start in the Spring and will offer capital grants to businesses switching to more efficient heating systems; and an on-going plan to deliver 1GW of solar capacity across the capital by 2030, including a £4.5m programme to install solar on Transport for London (TfL) buildings.

In addition, the Mayor’s Office confirmed a year-long trial to allow City Hall to supply clean power to TfL has kicked off.

London has become the first public body to secure a junior electricity licence and last month began purchasing low carbon energy from Peabody Services and Scottish & Southern Energy (SSE Heat Networks), to help power two Transport for London depots: Northfields in Ealing and Northumberland Park in Haringey.

Source: businessgreen.com

US Wind Industry Installed 7 Gigawatts In 2017 & Drove $11 Billion In Investment

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The US wind industry installed an impressive 7 gigawatts of new power capacity in 2017 and drove $11 billion worth of new private investment, according to a new report published by the American Wind Energy Association.

Even more impressive was the 29 new wind farms totalling 4,125 MW (megawatts) that came online across 16 states in the fourth quarter alone.

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) published its U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2017 Market Report on Tuesday, highlighting the 7,017 MW of new wind brought online during 2017, bringing the country’s cumulative total wind energy capacity up to 89,077 MW spread out across 41 states, and representing enough electricity to power 26 million homes. On top of new installed wind capacity, the report highlighted an additional 2,136 MW worth of partial repowerings that were completed during 2017.

There is also another 28,668 MW worth of wind farms in the pipeline in various stages of construction or advanced development, a 34% increase compared to the end of 2016. This figure included 5,393 MW worth of new announcements made during the fourth quarter.+

“Wind delivered big results for the U.S. economy in 2017. Building new wind farms keeps American factory and construction workers busy, while breathing new life into farming and ranching communities,” said Tom Kiernan, CEO of the AWEA. “This American success story will continue, with the wind project construction and advanced development pipeline four times greater than the amount installed in 2017. That means tens of billions in additional infrastructure investment is on its way to the United States of America.”

According to the AWEA, a total of nearly 5,500 MW worth of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) were signed during 2017, an increase of 29% year-over-year, with corporate and other non-utility customers signing all 710 MW worth of PPAs announced during the fourth quarter.

A total of 29 new wind projects were commissioned across 16 states in the fourth quarter, totaling 4,125 MW, and was led by Texas which installed 1,179 MW, followed by Oklahoma with 851 MW, Iowa with 334 MW, Illinois with 306 MW, and Missouri with 300 MW. For the full year 2017 Texas installed a total of 2,305 MW, followed by Oklahoma with 851 MW and Kansas with 659 MW. Texas also continues to lead overall with a cumulative capacity of 22,637 MW. However, the second place is now held by Oklahoma with 7,495 MW, surpassing Iowa which now has 7,308 MW.

Source: cleantechnica.com

Montana Solar Panel Installers Not Fazed by New Tariff

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In one of President Donald Trump’s biggest trade agreements thus far in 2018, he’s imposed a 30-percent tariff on imported solar panels.

Currently, 60 percent of solar panels are manufactured in China and other parts of Asia, and they’re cheaper than their American counterparts.

The Solar Energy Industries Association is predicting 23,000 people will lose their jobs.

But in Montana, installers are singing a different tune.

“In a smaller market like Montana we’re not competing against those bigger behemoths that cause those costs to rise because their companies are so small,” said Brad Van Wert, CEO of Bozeman-based Solar Harvest.

“We have people concerned because they’re hearing 30 percent, ’30 percent, oh my gosh, I’m not even sure I can do it already, and now 30 percent,’ but I want everyone to understand that’s only on a portion of the products, and that’s not even on products that every installer uses,” he added.

One of those small-scale installers is Andrew Faber from Glacier Solar Energy. Faber works independently and caters to RV customers who want the freedom to travel into remote areas off the grid.

He says he already only uses American-made panels from a manufacturer in Oregon for a number of reasons.

“The quality of the panels is better, the customer service and the warranties,” he said. “There’s a huge nationwide dealer system if anything were to happen.”

Jeff Arcel, from Aeon Renewable Energy in Whitefish, has been doing solar projects in the Flathead County since the 1970s.

He installed the county’s only solar-powered gas station and has worked on large-scale residential and commercial projects.

“I don’t really think it’s going to affect me or the jobs I get up here,” he said, and noted that his most recent project would’ve cost a difference of $1,000 had he used imported solar panels.

Arcel says he’s not a fan of tariffs on anything, but he doesn’t believe they’ll stop the solar industry’s growth.

“The solar industry is a very robust, healthy and adaptable industry,” said Arcel.

“I’ve seen it grow and change a lot, particularly in the last 10 years here in the United States, and I think it can survive unfair policies,” he said.

Source: nbcmontana.com

California Wants 5 Million Zero Emissions Cars On Its Roads By 2030

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

California seeks to preserve its place as the greenest state in America with more cleantech leadership. On January 26, governor Jerry Brown signed an executive order that commits the state to a goal of having 5 million zero-emissions cars on its roads by 2030. The previous goal was 1.5 million ZEVs by 2025. Battery electric cars and hydrogen fuel cell cars are zero emissions by the definition. The latter will irritate some EV fans, who see hydrogen vehicles as a big #fail. Some plug-in hybrids are also classified as zero emissions by the California Air Resources Board.

“The goal is to make our neighborhoods and farms healthier, our vehicles cleaner — zero emission the sooner the better — and all of our technologies increasingly lowering their carbon output,” Brown said in his annual State of the State address last week. As reported by the San Jose Mercury, he told the state legislature, “We’ve all got a lot of work. And think of all the jobs, and how much cleaner our air will be then.”

To reach the goal, California will spend $2.5 billion between now and 2025 to install more charging stations and hydrogen fueling stations throughout the state. It will also beef up its incentives and rebate programs for people who buy zero emissions cars. Right now, there are about 350,000 zero-emissions vehicles on the road in California. Increasing the number 15 fold in 12 years will be a daunting task.

The plan calls for expanding the number of EV charging stations in the state from 14,000 today to 250,000. Fast charging stations will increase from 1,500 to 10,000 and hydrogen refueling stations will jump from 31 today to 200. Some of the cost of expanding the charging infrastructure will be paid for money Volkswagen has agreed to pay to settle claims connected to its diesel cheating scandal. Proceeds from California’s cap & trade carbon emissions will also pay part of the cost.

The state’s utility companies will be part of the push for more electric chargers as well. This week, San Diego Gas & Electric announced it is adding charging equipment for heavy-duty vehicles at the Port of San Diego, San Diego International Airport, and freight handling hubs. Those new facilities will meet the charging needs of electric tractor trailers, forklifts, and other medium- to heavy-duty equipment. It will also add public chargers at four Park & Ride commuter lots in the area. The expansion program was approved January 11 by the California Public Utilities Commission, according to Electric Cars Report.

“The governor is basically going big before he goes home,” said Simon Mui, a senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council. “What he’s laying out is a foundation to move California away from fossil fuels and internal combustion engines.” Many nations — such as China, France, and India — have already announced their intention to ban cars with internal combustion engines over the next 15 to 20 years. What California is doing is aggressive only by comparison to what other states are not doing. A bill has also been introduced in the California legislature that would ban the sale of cars with internal combustion engines by 2040.

California is allowed to set higher standards for vehicles sold within its borders than the national standard because of a waiver granted to it by the EPA decades ago, but the feds could seek to revoke that waiver at any time. It is currently in negotiations with officials from the federal government. Those negotiations are cordial for the moment, but that could change.

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, an industry trade group that represents most US automakers, has been leading the charge to roll back fuel economy and emissions standards put in place by the Obama administration. But for now, it is playing nice with California, which is the largest new car market in the nation.

“While we’ll surely have questions that we’ll need clarification for, we’re pleased to see that Governor Brown has committed to an ambitious program to develop desperately needed infrastructure and a consistent incentive program that will give customers the confidence and encouragement to purchase zero-emission vehicles,” says Curt Augustine, the group’s vice president. “Meeting California’s climate goals is a partnership.” What the car companies want most is a unified set of rules that apply nationwide. It costs lots of money to build different cars for different markets. But they would prefer more relaxed regulations whenever possible.

Loosely translated, Curt Augustine’s statement means the car companies are happy to bend a bit if California will do the heavy lifting when it comes to building out the EV charging network in the state so they don’t have to. The outlier in the industry is Tesla, which has elected to build its own proprietary charging system using its own money. Whether taxpayers or industry should pay for infrastructure improvements is a discussion few people are willing to have.

The capitalist model currently in place in the US would suggest the market will provide chargers when the public is willing to pay for them. After all, no one ever subsidized the proliferation of gas stations in the US in the early days of the automobile. The answer is, the earth can’t wait for market forces to act — not if we hope to avoid an existential crisis that could threaten the ability of the planet to sustain human habitation.

“There is no way on earth they can reach their greenhouse gas goals unless they do something to force a lot more electric vehicles in the mix,” says James Sweeney, director of the Precourt Energy Efficiency Center at Stanford University. “That’s the reality. I don’t think they will be able to meet the goals even if they do force a lot more electric vehicles in the mix because there are all of the existing vehicles on the road.”

Indeed, to meet the target Brown has set, 40% of the cars sold in the state by 2030 will need to be ZEVs according the Mary Nichols, the head of CARB. Compare that to the 5% of sales today to understand the enormity of the task ahead.

For modern day Republicans who wring their hands in despair at the thought of government mandates, they would do well to remember that the wild-eyed left-wing radical known as Ronald Reagan created CARB when he was governor. Arnold Schwarzenegger, another darling of the Republican Party, was the first California governor to impose carbon emission reduction plans in the Golden State. Being a Republican is no excuse for failing to govern responsibly.

Source: cleantechnica.com

Solar Energy Can Create More Good Jobs

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Iowa is known across the country as a leader in renewable energy, including ethanol, biodiesel and wind. These industries are built on Iowa’s natural resources and benefit Iowans through lower energy costs, increased crop values and new jobs. In 2016 alone, Iowa jobs in clean energy grew by 7 percent.

Solar energy holds even more promise for Iowa. The sun that helps grow our crops also can power homes, farms and businesses.

Since 2012, Iowans have installed more than 2,500 solar projects in all of Iowa’s 99 counties. These projects lower energy costs and raise property values, with rural counties leading the way. Many Iowa utilities recognize the appeal of solar and are making it a viable option for their customers. More than 700 Iowans now work in the solar field, and 47 Iowa businesses are part of the solar energy supply chain.

The demand for solar presents Iowa with continued opportunities for growth. We can do our part by ensuring Iowans have the knowledge to grow the industry and the skills to fill the jobs.

Source: newtondailynews.com

China plans first lab on ocean oil spill cleaning

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

China’s Ministry of Transport is planning to establish a laboratory specializing in treating oil spills at sea, the first of its kind in the country, local media Science and Technology Daily reported on Sunday. China is spending some 200 million yuan a year on researches for emergency treatment of oil spills but the technological expertise has not been widely applied because of lack of such a lab, the report said.

The laboratory is planned in northern port city of Tianjin, off the Bohai Bay, with an initial investment 400 million yuan ($63 million). The investment will go to research projects on oceanic ecological protection and safety issues for sea-borne transportation.

To date, only the United States and France have laboratories capable of undertaking tests and inspections required in treating ocean oil spills, the report said.
The Iranian oil tanker Sanchi collided with a dry cargo vessel early this month about 160 nautical miles off China’s east coast, in the world’s worst oil tanker disaster for decades.

Source: reuters

T-Mobile Announces Commitment To 100% Renewable Electricity, Joins RE100

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

T-Mobile US has announced its intention this week to go 100% renewable electricity by 2021 and has backed its commitments by announcing a Power Purchase Agreement for 160 megawatts from the Solomon Forks Wind Project in Kansas.

Announced on Monday, T-Mobile US — the self-proclaimed “Un-carrier” of American telecommunications — revealed that it had set in place a commitment to transition to 100% renewable electricity by 2021 and subsequently announced it had joined the 100% renewable electricity initiative RE100. T-Mobile also announced that it had secured a 160 MW (megawatt) Power Purchase Agreement from Infinity Renewables’ 474 MW Solomon Forks Wind Project in Kansas — joining Target as an off-taker from the Solomon Forks project.

The Solomon Forks Wind Project is expected to begin generating electricity in early 2019, but this is T-Mobile’s second PPA, following the company’s Agreement signed in April of 2017 to secure 160 MW from the 300 MW Red Dirt wind farm in Oklahoma, operated by Enel Green Power.

“It’s the Un-carrier way to do the right thing by our customers, and moving to renewable energy is just a natural part of that,” said John Legere, president and CEO at T-Mobile. “And it’s not just the right thing to do — it’s smart business! We expect to cut T-Mobile’s energy costs by around $100 million in the next 15 years thanks to this move. Imagine the awesome things we can do for our customers with that!”

T-Mobile will be focusing on securing its renewable electricity needs through wind PPAs in order to account for every unit of electricity the company consumers. Further, T-Mobile will only buy from projects that wouldn’t exist without the company’s involvement.

To formalzse its 100% renewable electricity commitment, T-Mobile also joined the 100% renewable electricity initiative RE100 — created by The Climate Group and CDP — joining companies like Nike, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook.

“It’s great to see T-Mobile US shifting to renewables for its power consumption,” said Sam Kimmins, Head of RE100 at The Climate Group. “As a large electricity consumer in the US, they can truly transform energy systems by bringing significant renewable capacity online — all of that while delivering real value to their customers. I congratulate them for a great commitment.”

Source: cleantechnica.com