Home Blog Page 243

Vojin Djordjevic: Preciousness of Unprocessed Water

Photo: VodaVoda
Photo: VodaVoda

When VODAVODA first appeared on our market in 2004, in just three months, it won millions of consumers and a third of the domestic market of bottled water. The water factory stopped operation in the meantime, VODAVODA disappeared from the shelves and the rest of us were deprived of one of the best quality water coming from the natural and healthy environment in Banja Vrujci. For three years now, this brand has been available again for sale and it gradually occupies a place that it used to have on the domestic and foreign markets. With Vojin Djordjevic, we discussed the importance of natural mineral water, which without any artificial filtration and processing is only bottled in the new plant with a striking name “The House of Water”.

EP: Are you satisfied with the comeback of VODAVODA to the domestic market?

Vojin Djordjevic: We are extremely pleased that the results of the achieved sales show a very good trend, although the figures are still not on the profit side. We invested much more than we earned, but I am sure that, due to the special quality of VODAVODA and the beneficial effect on the health of all who drink it, all investments will be returned in the future. We are satisfied that an increasing number of consumers find out about the existence of unspoiled nature and water source owned by Banja Vrujci. It is not necessary to travel to this water spring in order to enjoy this water. Packed in a bottle of VODAVODA, it is available to us at almost all the retail outlets in our country. We are on a good path that has become our obligation and we must not stop.

EP: The promotion of VODAVODA brand is based on water properties from a depth of 605 meters and the absence of its processing. Do you consider the information that water is not being processed but bottled directly, as an important one for the consumers?

Vojin Djordjevic: This information is important for every consumer of bottled water. Such unprocessed water is very rare in Serbia and in the world. When something is created, as we create the world brand VODAVODA, it is necessary to think not only of ourselves but of factors in the process of creation: people, nature, quality, future. Only such a brand is true, durable and, above all, good. We have done everything that VODAVODA is natural: that it comes directly from nature to the consumer and that nature is left untouched. That is the essence. You know, the first contact with water from Banja Vrujci with the outside world is the moment when the consumer opens the bottle of VODAVODA.

EP: What does your team do so that the consumer learns about the quality of VODAVODA?

Vojin Djordjevic: The business strategy of VODAVODA brand is based on well-founded principles that are a sound basis for a quality upgrade. This also applies to the area of water quality that we offer to consumers. The quality of water is not proved by aggressive marketing or large-scale sales, but by science-based certificates, issued by accredited top experts who, on the basis of the detailed analysis, confirm quality. Our team, according to the brand strategy, sent VODAVODA for an analysis to top-level and relevant scientific institutions in our country and in the world, and then, with justified facts, addressed consumers. First of all, we emphasize that VODAVODA is the holder of the world’s most prestigious certificate – NSF. It guarantees to the consumer safety, consistency in the same mineral composition always and superior quality achieved by the highest global standards in the bottling process. This year we have completed another long-term research in our scientific research institution with the highest credibility. As we expected, the results obtained, are exceptional and will soon be officially announced. In science, there are clear parameters for assessing water quality, and there is no mistake.

EP: Can you explain to us what you wanted to say or highlight when you named the plant “The House of Water“?

Vojin Djordjevic: We do not have a water processing factory that processes water, like other brands. We do not use chemicals for water treatment, and we do not have harmful substances that pollute nature, and we recycle the packaging. We do our best for VODAVODA to be the brand with so-called “zero waste”. This is the latest concept of sustainability of a healthy environment, which is no longer enough to create unwanted waste, and then neutralize it, but you must follow the course of nature that prevents the development of an unhealthy substance. That’s why we have been thinking about what to name the production itself for a long time. The usual name for our industry is “factory”, but it was not appropriate for us, because it means machines that change water by using chemicals, and we do not do it. We were not happy with the “bottling plant” designation. It was not until the solemn opening when the priest said: “Today we are happy because we are in this house of water …”, we realized that he said the essence. It is a home that symbolizes everything we want to say to the world – to preserve, nourish, give away and always give birth to water over and over again.

Photo: VodaVoda

SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

The quality of water is supported by laboratory analysis carried out in international accredited laboratories. Thanks to this, the VODAVODA brand is classified as a significant promoter of environmental protection. The Strategy of Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development envisages enabling “The House of Water” to use clean energy. Accordingly, a solar power plant will be installed to obtain heat and electricity. This will completely round up the environmental sustainability of VODAVODA.

EP: Is it easy to preserve this balance between the man and nature?

Vojin Djordjevic: Possibility to master the technology of water bottling with the highest quality process, brings me joy, but also the responsibility. The obligation in “The House of Water” is to use technology in a way that is even more stringent than the one prescribed by law. By using modern methods of preserving nature and the environment, we take care not to jeopardize or disturb its balance.

EP: NFS certificate has enabled VODAVODA to be on the world market as well. Was it necessary to introduce certain technological novelties in “The House of Water”?

Vojin Djordjevic: No, it was not. NSF certificate just confirmed that we did everything in the right way and that we just have to continue doing so. We know that the water we draw from the spring in Banja Vrujci is perfect, with an ideal mineral composition and naturally well balanced. On domestic, but also on the world market, you have the least water that has not been processed. It is a real treasure.

EP: What do you think is crucial for the good placement of such a product on the foreign market?

Vojin Djordjevic: VODAVODA became a hit on all the markets on which it appeared. In Kuwait, where it appeared this year, it provoked a sensation. There are already indications that this will happen again in other countries in the Persian Gulf. Foreign distributors contact us for bottle design. They unquestionably estimate that their customers will first reach for the unique bottle shape on the shelf in the supermarket. Getting to know the composition and natural properties of water is the next step that leads to a lasting relationship with the consumer. Natural mineral waters, such as VODAVODA, are very rare in the world today.

EP: At one time, VODAVODA was better sold on the Taiwan market than the famous Evian water. Do you believe that you will repeat that success?

Vojin Djordjevic: The fact that in 2006 we sold more water in Taiwan than world leader is a proof that consumers reward quality. This is one of the events that motivated me, even when it was most difficult, not to sell the brand VODAVODA and not to leave Banja Vrujci. I was also encouraged by the positive reactions of visitors to fairs and information from the market. I do not give up on the idea that VODAVODA remains unprocessed. I believe that natural quality water with exclusive design has no competition. I do not have a dilemma that VODAVODA will surpass that success in Taiwan.

EP: You have also taken steps that have a positive impact on the development of Banja Vrujci, and the improvement of the lives of its inhabitants. What’s your contribution to the progress in the spa environment?

Vojin Djordjevic: We try to contribute to the development of Banja Vrujci, but it is not appropriate if I talk about it. It is better to ask the people of Banja Vrujci about this. Our most important goal is to preserve and protect the nature of this incredible place. By that, I mean the use of renewable energy sources in the whole Banja and then in the region. In addition, we want people of that region to live in prosperity, peace and spiritual joy. I gave the vow to restore the church Protection of the Theotokos, whose ruins we found during the construction of “The House of Water”. The locals tell me that today they feel the existence of sin because of the demolition of this church after the Second World War. I am convinced that the renewal of the church will bring good to everyone.

EP: About 80% of bottled water from domestic springs is in the hands of foreign companies. In addition to your “The House of Water”, there are only “Heba” in Bujanovac and “Milan Toplica” in Prokuplje, with a few smaller producers in domestic ownership. Do you think we are managing water resources intelligently?

Vojin Djordjevic: Serbia is rich in water resources and has the potential to prudently manage this wealth itself, despite the fact that world trends in water are dictated by multinational companies that own two large sources in our country. For the production and distribution of bottled water, huge investments are needed, the ones that multinational companies have. It is very di cult for the domestic manufacturer to compete with such a strong competition. Empowering domestic production and the availability of bottled water could create a natural balance. Domestic bottled water would outdo the quality of the waters of multinational companies and thus conquer the market, while multinational companies would continue to dominate with their advertising. Our example can help potential new water producers. VODAVODA has achieved competitiveness in the market for water quality and packaging design.

Photo: VodaVoda

EP: In this regard, there is more and more talk about the sale of spas in Serbia located at the sources of geothermal and mineral water. How could it affect your local community?

Vojin Djordjevic: Spas in Serbia have a long tradition. Their many sources of geothermal and mineral water are known for their healing properties, and the natural environment for centuries have been a subject of admiration. We would all like to have our spas come into the hands of those who will take care of them in a way that their quality deserves so that we are once again proud of the top quality and top service. I believe that the state knows what the interests are and that clear regulation in the process of promoting spa tourism is prescribed.

For me, Banja Vrujci is supreme. Because of its nature and people you just grow fond of the region, it becomes a part of you as if you were born there. We have found a way to contribute to the development of tourism in Banja Vrujci and we want to further improve it as much as possible. VODAVODA performs all of its business communication, not only production, in Vrujci. Guests from abroad, distributors, customers, journalists, all who come to us on business stay in our hotel where we present the beauty of spa tourism. Full of impressions they take to their worlds some of the most beautiful stories about the place where VODAVODA wells up. I would like people from all over the world, not just because of business, but because of the beauty of this region, to come to Banja Vrujci and see where VODAVODA is bottled.

EP: The World Economic Forum recently released warning results of water research from the water supply system on five continents indicating the presence of micro-particles in almost all water samples. No one knows how this will affect people’s health, but it is obvious that the plastic we throw in watercourses, ends up in water supply systems. In your opinion, how can we influence people’s awareness of the importance of preserving watercourses and sources?

Vojin Djordjevic: We should all be aware that water remembers everything, every thrown plastic bag, PET packaging, a discharged chemical. Campaigns to raise awareness precisely serve to inform and encourage people how to dispose of waste properly. They remind us to think of ourselves and of others, as well. Controlled use of products that are unhealthy for nature is only the remedy of consequences, but not the cause of the problem. However, the question arises why, at all, are those products that threaten the nature and the man in it produced. Today’s world is not able to completely and quickly get rid of the production of products that pollute nature. Still, we can be caring. On a personal level, we can take care not to waste the packaging, and on a professional level, factories should act responsibly with waste materials. Continuous campaigns and the availability of a waste disposal sites we make it easier for the individual to be responsible. The legislation, as well as credit facilities for companies, enable the introduction of a system for waste treatment and recycling of packaging.

We are all participants in this global problem and we are all together responsible for the outcome. Therefore, there is no such thing as one man, one source, one river, one country, but our common land and one nature – our planet Earth.

Interview by: Tamara Zjacic

This interview was originally published in the eighth issue of the Energy Portal Magazine ECOHEALTH, in November 2017.

Green Investment Group Acquires 25% Stake In 210 Megawatt Westermost Rough Offshore Wind Farm

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The Green Investment Group, now owned by Macquarie Group, has this week announced the acquisition of a 25% stake in the 210 megawatt (MW) Westermost Rough offshore wind farm from Marubeni Corporation.

Announced on Tuesday, the Green Investment Group (GIG) — which was recently acquired by Macquarie Group and now acts as the Group’s specialist green energy principal investment business — has acquired a 25% stake in the Westermost Rough offshore wind farm which was held by the Marubeni Corporation, a Japanese sōgō shōsha company with holds interests in a variety of sectors.

The Green Investment Group’s 25% acquisition increases its existing stake in the Westermost Rough offshore wind farm, that is held as part of a consortium with Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund 5 (MEIF5) and the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS). The remaining 50% of Westermost Rough is held by project developer Ørsted.

The 210 MW Westermost Rough offshore wind farm was officially inaugurated in July of 2015, and is made up of 35 of Siemens Gamesa 6 MW wind turbines. Located 8 kilometers off the Holderness coast in the United Kingdom, it generates enough electricity to supply the needs of around 150,000 British households each year.

“Westermost Rough is a landmark project in the evolution of the offshore wind industry, both in the UK and internationally,” said Edward Northam, Head of GIG in Europe. “The technical and financial innovations deployed during the development, construction and operation of the wind farm have helped improve performance levels and reduce the cost of wind power generation, making it significantly more cost competitive. We are extremely proud of this pioneering green investment.

“Alongside Ørsted, Marubeni has been an excellent partner on the project, which owes much to the company’s pioneering and collaborative spirit. Marubeni has played a crucial role in supporting the growth of the UK and global green economies and we look forward to exploring further opportunities to cooperate in future.”

“Marubeni is committed to actively support the global energy transition to renewable energy with the aim to increase renewable energy capacity in our portfolio to 20%, doubling the past target,” added a spokesman for the Marubeni Corporation (PDF). “In order to achieve that ambition, Marubeni is keen to deploy the skills and knowledge we gained from our investments in offshore wind farms, including Westermost Rough.

“GIG is a leading player in the offshore wind sector and has been an important partner for us. We look forward to exploring further collaboration opportunities with them in future.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

Arctic Sea Ice Hits Second-Lowest Winter Peak on Record

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Arctic sea ice has experienced its maximum extent for the year, reaching 14.48 million square kilometers (approximately 5.59 million square miles) on March 17—the second smallest in the 39-year satellite record.

The provisional data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) shows the 2018 winter peak only narrowly avoided taking 2017’s record.

The run of low extents in recent winters suggests that “profound ice loss is no longer limited to summer but now extends across all seasons,” an NSDIC scientist told Carbon Brief.

Meanwhile, in Antarctica, sea ice has already reached its minimum extent following the summer melt season. This also clocked in as the second lowest on record.

As the northern hemisphere emerges from winter, the annual expansion of sea ice in the Arctic slows to a stop. This peak signals the start of the melt season in spring and summer.

Using satellites, scientists can mark this point every year, recording when the Arctic sea ice hit its largest extent and the size it reached. It is one way of monitoring the “health” of the Arctic.

Early indications suggest that Arctic sea ice reached an annual maximum of 14.48 million square kilometers (sq km) on March 17. This is the second lowest winter peak in the 39-year satellite record—just 60,000 sq km larger than the 2017 record—and 1.16m sq km smaller than the 1981-2010 average.

At the point of this winter’s peak, there were two particular areas with very low sea ice extents, the NSIDC said—the Bering Sea (in the Pacific Ocean between Russia and Alaska) and the Barents Sea (in the Atlantic Ocean to the north of Scandinavia).

This year has already been marked by new records, with both January and February seeing the smallest average sea ice cover for their respective months. The winter peak looked set to be a record itself before a spell of cold conditions caused a late growth spurt in mid-March.

The Arctic winter has been marked by some unusually high temperatures, which has in turn pushed bitterly cold conditions over Europe in recent weeks.

This warmth has also likely affected how thick Arctic sea ice is at the moment, said Andrew Shepherd, professor of earth observation at the University of Leeds. He told Carbon Brief:

“Although Arctic sea ice started this winter about 5cm thicker than the previous year, there was slower growth in December—possibly as a result of the relatively warm weather—and by the end of last month it was around 166cm thick, almost identical to 2017.”

Although Arctic sea ice has reached its maximum extent, it will take a little longer for it to reach its peak volume for the season, added Shepherd:

“In most years, Arctic sea ice continues to thicken for a few more weeks after the peak extent is reached as it usually takes a while for summer heat to reach the far North, and so we don’t expect the maximum volume to occur until mid-March.”

This year’s near-record low extent for the winter maximum follows new records in 2015, 2016 and 2017.

This means that the four lowest maximum extents in the satellite record have all occurred in the past four years, noted the NSIDC.

The pattern shows that it is not just the summer where significant sea ice loss is seen, said Julienne Stroeve, a professor of polar observation and modeling at University College London and senior research scientist at the NSIDC. She told Carbon Brief:

“Profound ice loss is no longer limited to summer, but now extends across all seasons. These winter changes will help hasten the transition towards a seasonal ice-free Arctic.”

For example, NSIDC data shows average sea ice extents in January and February are declining at a rate of 3.3 percent and 3.1 percent per decade, respectively.

While the Arctic has been gaining ice over the cold, dark winter, Antarctic sea ice has been melting through the southern hemisphere summer.

Antarctic sea ice reached its summer minimum at the end of February, clocking in at 2.18m sq km. This is the second lowest minimum extent in the satellite record, 70,000 sq km larger than the record set in 2017.

The 2017-18 melt season had begun low. Its starting point was the second lowest winter maximum on record in October. It “went downhill from there,” explained Dr. Ted Scambos, senior research scientist at NSIDC and lead scientist for their science team. He told Carbon Brief:

“A big factor in the rapid loss in November and December was the growth of a large area of open water within the pack, the Maud Rise Polynya. This is thought to be due to ocean upwelling driven by deep currents that pass over a large seamount [underwater mountain] in the Weddell Sea. This then was breached by the retreating ice edge.”

At the point of the minimum last month, “almost every area of the Antarctic coastal ocean had less sea ice than normal,” noted Sambos, “except for the western Weddell Sea—pressed against the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula—that was normal in extent and fearsomely well-packed.”

Antarctic sea ice extent has seen a huge amount of variability in recent years. This has taken scientists by surprise, said Scambos, as it follows several decades of relative stability that “appeared to show a slight upward trend in sea ice.” He explained:

“The past five years have seen both all-time high levels—in September 2014—and astonishing record lows—in October/November of 2016. Moreover, a new look at early satellite data from the 1960s confirmed that the Antarctic sea ice system is far more sensitive to seasonal and inter-annual weather and climate differences than had been appreciated before.”

This variability means that recent changes to Antarctic sea ice “can’t really be said to be responding to the general global trend in temperature,” said Scambos—unlike sea ice in the Arctic.

While other data shows that “Antarctica’s climate and ocean are indeed changing,” it may take longer to be able to draw robust conclusions about how sea ice will be affected by human-caused warming, said Scambos:

“It may require another decade or two still before we can say with confidence how Antarctica’s sea ice will respond [to climate change]—at least, if the basis is observations.”

Source: ecowatch.com

Repowering UK Wind Farms Low-Cost Option To Increase Renewable Generation

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Repowering and upgrading ageing UK wind farms as they near the end of their scheduled lifespan could increase the UK’s generating capacity by 1.3 gigawatts, providing a highly cost-effective means of increasing renewable generation.

This is the key finding from a new study published by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) which analyzed a database of onshore wind farms across England, Scotland, and Wales (three of the four countries which make up the United Kingdom). The research found that there are nearly 60 projects with over 750 wind turbines that will reach their 20th year in service within the next five years, including some at locations deemed the best for wind energy in the country.

As one of the first countries to commit to wind energy, the UK has long been rewarded for its initiative, and will therefore also be one of the first countries to encounter the problem of what to do with wind farms once they reach the end of their scheduled lifespan. According to the ECIU study, upgrading these wind farms with the latest and most efficient wind turbines would not only increase the country’s generating capacity by more than 1.3 gigawatts (GW), it also ensures that this existing generating capacity is not lost in the first place.

Looked at another way, upgrades to existing wind farms would provide over 3 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually, which is enough to power around 800,000 UK homes, and would save consumers more than £77 million per year on energy bills as compared to generating electricity from gas-fired power stations.

“Britain installed its first wind farms during the early 1990s when the technology was in its infancy, and the electricity generated was significantly more expensive than that from fossil fuels,” said Dr Jonathan Marshall, ECIU Energy Analyst and author of the report. “The industry has developed rapidly, however, and modern turbines generate vastly more power than older ones at costs competitive with coal and gas fired generation, especially when located onshore.

“It makes sense to repower sites of the earliest wind farms, which tend to be in locations that have the best wind resource. Existing infrastructure including network connections can also be reused or upgraded at costs lower than for new sites.”

Repowering ageing wind farms could also yield significant benefits to local communities. Specifically, the authors of the report calculated that the first wave of repowering could yield £100 million, 80% of which would go to rural regions.

“Upgrading our oldest wind farms with the latest technology would deliver a big boost of clean power to the grid at a time when wind is already making a record contribution, while delivering cash for the communities that have hosted these sites for years,” said Simon Clarke, Conservative MP for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland. “It would also provide a market for the newly re-invigorated British steel industry, cut greenhouse gas emissions faster and, given that repowering is the cheapest way for us to expand electricity generation, reduce bills for businesses and consumers.

“For those worried about the 1% of UK gas imports that come from Mr Putin, these upgrades would also reduce our reliance on imported fuel by the equivalent of two gas-fired power stations; and if we don’t allow developers to repower them, we may lose them for good.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

Carbon emissions reached a historic high in 2017

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Carbon emissions reached a historic high in 2017 according to a new report by a major intergovernmental organisation.
Figures released by the International Energy Agency show higher energy demands and a slowing of energy efficiency improvements were responsible for the emissions up tick.
After three years of flat lining, carbon dioxide levels around the world increased in 2017 by 1.4 per cent to 32.5 gigatonnes.

The increase stands in stark contrast to the demands of the Paris climate agreement, which calls for drastic cuts in global emissions if the world is to meet its ambitious targets.
Under the 2015 agreement, nations agreed to limit the increase in global temperatures to no more than 2C above pre-industrial times.

“The robust global economy pushed up energy demand last year, which was mostly met by fossil fuels, while renewables made impressive strides,” said Dr Fatih Birol, the agency’s executive director.
India and China accounted for 70 per cent of the global increase in energy demand, while several major economies actually saw dips in their emissions levels – including the UK, Mexico and Japan.

Notably, the US saw the biggest drop in carbon dioxide emissions.
Though Donald Trump has now announced his intention to withdraw the US from the Paris climate agreement, the nation has increased implementation of renewable energy in recent years.
Emissions in the US have also dropped due to a switch from coal to gas that has taken place across the country.

At a global level, while the majority of energy demand growth was met by fossil fuels, renewable energy still had the highest growth rate of any fuel.
Despite these successes, the International Energy Agency said their new figures are evidence not enough is being done to combat climate change on a global scale.

“The significant growth in global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2017 tells us that current efforts to combat climate change are far from sufficient,” said Dr Birol.

“For example, there has been a dramatic slowdown in the rate of improvement in global energy efficiency as policy makers have put less focus in this area.”

In the three years prior to 2017, energy efficiency improvements were being made at a rate of 2.3 per cent, whereas last year this slowed down to 1.7 per cent.

Source: independent

Solar Power Energy Payback Time Is Now Super Short

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Some solar power critics seem to enjoy trying to point out that the energy payback time for solar power is too long, and therefore this form of renewable energy is not valid. Those critics have not kept up with the times or are simply lying to you.

Years ago, when solar cells were less efficient, there might have been some truth in questioning the energy payback of solar panels because they were most likely manufactured using electricity generated from coal, natural gas, or nuclear power and were less efficiently manufactured.

Today’s solar panels are more efficient, so they produce more electricity, and this fact along with more efficient manufacturing means that energy payback periods have decreased to just a few years. Research has found, “Energy payback estimates for rooftop PV systems are 4, 3, 2, and 1 years: 4 years for systems using current multicrystalline-silicon PV modules, 3 years for current thin-film modules, 2 years for anticipated multicrystalline modules, and 1 year for anticipated thin-film modules (see Figure 1). With energy paybacks of 1 to 4 years and assumed life expectancies of 30 years, 87% to 97% of the energy that PV systems generate won’t be plagued by pollution, greenhouse gases, and depletion of resources.”

Other estimates also show solar is viable and have tremendous energy payback periods. “In Australia, the International Energy Agency[vii] calculated the energy payback period for a solar power system to be under two years. This means a solar power system takes less than two years to generate enough energy to break even on the amount of energy taken to manufacture it.

“Based on models and data examined by both the International Energy Agency and the US Department of Energy[viii], solar panels do pay back their energy investment. With solar panels lasting as long as 25 years, they make more energy over their lifetime than it takes to manufacture the panel. Since the payback times are decreasing over time, we have now reached the point that even at this strong growth, the total installed PV capacity is a net producer of energy and a net GHG sink.”

Floating solar power plantSolar power has already been used in manufacturing, so it is at least in theory possible it will eventually be used to produce solar panels (and it must be in some places). Once solar power is being used to produce solar panels, the question is, what does energy payback even matter?

Solar cells might eventually made from cheaper and more efficient materials, which would decrease their production costs even more and perhaps increase their efficiency and energy payback period.

Additionally, some of metrics, like energy payback, seem to be questionable in the way they are used by solar power critics and climate change deniers. For example, they don’t reference that the cost of continuing to use only fossil fuels are vastly greater than manufacturing and installing solar panels. “The share of national GDP at risk from climate change exceeds $1.5 trillion in the 301 major cities around the world. Including the impact of human pandemics – which are likely to become more severe as the planet warms — the figure increases to nearly $2.2 trillion in economic output at risk through 2025.”

The figures in the US are huge too. “Extreme weather, made worse by climate change, along with the health impacts of burning fossil fuels, has cost the U.S. economy at least $240 billion a year over the past ten years, a new report has found. And yet this does not include this past month’s three major hurricanes or 76 wildfires in nine Western states. Those economic losses alone are estimated to top $300 billion, the report notes.”

It’s very obvious that the financial costs of continuing to do business as usual are tremendous, but the human costs could be even greater.

Air pollution in China is so severe it may be contributing to 1.6 million human deaths per year. “Outdoor air pollution contributes to the deaths of an estimated 1.6 million people in China every year, or about 4,400 people a day, according to a newly released scientific paper.”

In the US, climate change actually may do severe financial damage to people who are already struggling. “The poorest third of US counties will likely lose up to 20 percent of their incomes, and regions such as the Pacific Northwest and New England will gain economically over the Gulf and Southern states, if climate change continues unmitigated through the end of the century, according to a new study co-led by two UC Berkeley researchers and published today in the journal Science.”

The critics of solar power fail to mention these fossil fuel costs over and over and over again. How could the fossil fuel industries even begin to pay for all the damage they have caused to human health and the planet? First of all, they wouldn’t do it, and they couldn’t afford it, so the fossil fuel damage payback time would be never.

What is the premature death payback time for coal power, or how about the oil spills payback time for petroleum companies? The Deepwater Horizon spill damage may very well still be occurring. “For those long-lived things like turtles and sperm whales and dolphins … they’re still in the middle of this. And we may not know for another 30 or 40 years where the impacts are,” said Larry McKinney, executive director of the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University. He made that remark in 2017, so perhaps we won’t know the full extent of the damage until at least 2047. By that time, will BP still be in business and will the company pay more than it has so far?

It is simply ludicrous to try to apply an energy payback standard to solar power, and yet, somehow, fossil fuels which have had an enormously damaging impact for years get off scot-free? Continuing to fail with only fossil fuels isn’t an option.

Source: cleantechnica.com

800 Megawatt Bay State Wind US Offshore Project Partners To Combine Energy Storage

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Earlier this month, the 800 megawatt Bay State Wind offshore project being developed jointly by Ørsted and Eversource off the coast of Massachusetts announced a deal which will see it work with local NEC Energy Solutions to develop an energy storage solution for the offshore wind farm.

Ørsted, one of the world’s leading offshore wind companies, and Eversource, New England’s premier transmission builder, announced on March 16 that their Bay State Wind partnership had signed a Letter of Intent to work collaboratively with Massachusetts-based NEC Energy Solutions so as to develop an energy storage solution for the 800 megawatt (MW) Bay State Wind. Specifically, they are looking to combine the offshore wind farm with a 55 MW/110 MW-hour (MWh) energy storage option, which upon completion would result in the world’s largest wind-paired energy storage system for commercial-scale energy.

Bay State Wind was first announced back in December of 2016 by then-DONG Energy (now Ørsted) and Eversource. At the time it was proposed, it was a 2 gigawatt (GW) offshore wind farm, which remains the end-goal but appears will be developed in stages, starting with 800 MW. Located 15 to 25 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts, the final 2 GW is expected to be able to generate clean electricity enough for a million homes.

The new agreement signed earlier this month serves to not only make the Bay State Wind project a potential world-first but also acts to support and promote Massachusetts’ energy storage market.

“We could not be more thrilled to work with a Massachusetts company that is a global leader in battery storage technology and products,” said Thomas Brostrøm, President of Ørsted North America. “NEC Energy Solutions is widely recognized as a pioneer and leader in the market for utility-scale energy storage, and their ability to recruit talent from the local workforce will help not only Bay State Wind, but it will help solidify Massachusetts as a global leader in the green energy revolution.”

“The development of a robust battery storage system is going to help Massachusetts become a leader in renewable energy, and more importantly it will help small businesses and consumers by ensuring a steady supply of energy, thereby reducing high-demand energy spikes,” added Eversource Vice President of Business Development Mike Auseré.

The collaboration between the three companies will not only result in an energy storage solution for Bay State Wind, but will also seek to accelerate the development of early commercial integration of energy storage technologies into the electricity supply chain, as well as capitalize on the potential inherent in energy storage technology to benefit the clean energy transition, grid reliability, system-wide efficiency, and system peak demand reduction.

“Bay State Wind brings industry leadership that is second to none,” said Steve Fludder, CEO of NEC Energy Solutions. “This development is crucial to growing our battery storage systems in Massachusetts, across America, and around the world. The Bay State Wind project is a unique opportunity and the benefits to the Commonwealth are immense. We are excited about what we can achieve together.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

U.S. Asks China to ‘Immediately Halt’ Ban on Foreign Waste

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Last year, China—the world’s largest importer of waste—announced it no longer wanted to take in other countries’ trash so it could focus on its own pollution problems.

This unexpected policy shift, which took effect Jan. 1, has left exporters in the U.S., Canada, Ireland, Germany and other European countries scrambling for solutions for their growing mountains of trash, the New York Times reported.

But rather than using this as an opportunity to improve and reshape domestic waste management and to force manufacturers to produce less waste, Washington has asked Beijing to reverse the ban.

On Friday, a U.S. representative at the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Council for Trade in Goods expressed concerns that China’s foreign waste ban could cause a fundamental disruption in global supply chains for scrap materials, Reuters reported.

“We request that China immediately halt implementation and revise these measures in a manner consistent with existing international standards for trade in scrap materials, which provide a global framework for transparent and environmentally sound trade in recycled commodities,” the official said at the meeting in Geneva.

“China’s import restrictions on recycled commodities have caused a fundamental disruption in global supply chains for scrap materials, directing them away from productive reuse and toward disposal.”

The request will likely fall on deaf ears amid President Donald Trump’s threat to impose penalties on up to $60 billion in Chinese imports. He has also called China an “economic enemy” of the U.S. and announced steep tariffs on solar panels, steel and aluminum imports.

China’s regulation, announced last July, is designed to reduce the country’s environmental pollution by banning 24 types of imported waste, including plastics, mixed paper, mining slap and discarded textiles.

“The concerns are neither reasonable nor have any legal basis,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said at a daily press briefing in response to the U.S. official’s remark.

“It’s very hypocritical of the U.S. to say China is breaching its WTO duty,” Hua said. She noted that the if the U.S. thought it legitimate to restrict exports of high-tech and high-value-added products, then China’s ban on foreign waste imports was not illegal.

“Restricting and banning the imports of solid waste is an important measure China has taken to implement the new development concept, improve environmental quality and safeguard people’s health,”

Hua said, adding that the Basel Convention allows countries the right to restrict the entry of foreign waste.

“We hope that the U.S. can reduce and manage hazardous waste and other waste of its own and take up more duties and obligations.”

The U.S. sends 13.2 million tons scrap paper and 1.42 million tons of scrap plastics to China every year.

Governments around the world are waking up to the scourge of plastic pollution and have implemented rules to stem the flow of plastic bags, bottles and other single-use items that clog landfills, pollute oceans and harm marine life.

While other developing countries such as Malaysia and Vietnam take foreign waste, Greenpeace East Asia noted that no other countries’ waste services have the same capacity as China’s.

The environmental organization said that waste-exporting countries will ultimately have to face waste problems at home. The ban should also prompt better waste management and recycling infrastructure in both exporting countries and China itself.

Greenpeace is also urging manufacturers of disposable products to take responsibility for their products through their entire life-cycle and invest in sustainable alternatives.

“This regulation will send shockwaves around the world, and force many countries to tackle the ‘out of sight, out of mind’ attitude we’ve developed towards waste,” said Greenpeace East Asia plastics campaigner Liu Hua in December.

“The world cannot continue with the current wasteful consumption model based on infinite growth in a finite world. Rather than find new places to export waste, governments and the private sector must find ways to simply reduce the amount of waste we are creating.”

Source: ecowatch.com

Emissions Must Fall By Mid-Century to Meet Paris Temperature Goals, Study Finds

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

With the exception of the U.S., every country in the world has now expressed an intention to honor the Paris agreement, which means they have all committed to limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions by the second half of the current century.

Now, two studies published Monday provide insight into how those commitments to avoid dangerous levels of climate change might practically be fulfilled.

One study, published in Nature Climate Change, used models to look specifically at the relationship between the Paris agreement’s temperature and emissions goals, and concluded they are not always consistent: Temperature goals would best be achieved by reducing emissions as early and steeply as possible, and reaching zero emissions too late might render them out of reach.

Another study published in Nature Energy offered one small but concrete step in that direction of a speedy emissions reduction. If countries used natural gas instead of coal in existing power stations, they could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 3 percent in less than five years.

The first study, which was led by Katsumasa Tanaka of the National Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan and co-authored by National Center for Atmospheric Research (NACAR) senior scientist Brian O’Neill, ran 10 different models for different temperature and emissions scenarios, NCAR’s AtmosNews reported Monday.

The results revealed that we could limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius by reducing emissions by 80 percent by 2033 or 2 degrees by reducing emissions by two-thirds by 2060. Emissions could then level off without having to fall all the way to zero.

However, if we overshoot the temperature goals and then try to double back to 1.5 or 2 degrees by the end of the century, it will not be enough to reduce emissions to zero; we will have to devise ways to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

“What we found is that the two goals do not always go hand in hand,” Tanaka told AtmosNews.”If we meet temperature targets without first overshooting them, we don’t have to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero. But if we do reduce emissions to zero, we still might not meet the temperature targets if we don’t reduce emissions quickly enough.”

The study underscores the importance of timing. It found that temperature will not rise above 2 degrees if we reach zero emissions by 2060, but, if we delay until the end of the century, temperatures will rise above 2 degrees by 2043 and remain above 2 degrees for at least a century.

O’Neil and Tanaka told AtmosNews they thought their research might inform the “global stocktakes” that countries must make every five years under the Paris agreement, reporting their progress and altering their goals.

“Our study and others may help provide countries with a clearer understanding of what work needs to be done to meet the goals laid out in the agreement. We believe that the Paris Agreement needs this level of scientific interpretation,” Tanaka said.

The Nature Energy study offered one step countries could take to begin reducing emissions quickly. The study, a joint effort by Imperial College London and the University of Sheffield, found that the UK reduced its total carbon emissions by 6 percent in 2016 by switching the fuel source of power plants from coal to natural gas, which emits less than half of the carbon dioxide that coal does when burned.

According to an Imperial College London press release, the study asked if the UK’s success could be replicated in the 30 largest coal-burning countries. It found that, if these countries used existing infrastructure and capabilities to switch from coal to gas, they could reduce global carbon dioxide emissions by 0.8 to 1.2 gigatonnes a year.

The study’s authors were quick to point out that switching to gas was a stop-gap measure for reducing emissions as quickly as possible while newer, more sustainable technologies are developed.

“Switching from coal to gas is not a long-term solution, but it is an important step to start reducing emissions quickly and at minimal cost. This will give us time to build up the required renewable energy capacity to permanently cut global carbon emissions,” co-author and Imperial College London researcher Dr. Iain Staffell said in the release.

And, as O’brien and Tanaka’s research indicates, time is of the essence.

Source: ecowatch.com

Green Investment Group Snaps Up Latest Offshore Wind Stake

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The UK’s offshore wind industry received a dual boost this week, as Green Investment Group (GIG) stepped up its interest in the sector and the first foundations were installed at the EOWDC project off the Scottish coast.

GIG, the former government-backed Green Investment Bank which is now owned by infrastructure banking giant Macquarie, announced this morning it has acquired a 25 per cent interest in Westermost Rough offshore wind farm from Marubeni Corporation.

The deal, financial details for which were not disclosed, strengthens GIG’s interest in the 210MW project. The company is already part of a consortium with Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund 5 (MEIF5) and the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) that owns a 25 per cent stake in Westermost Rough. Danish energy giant Ørsted owns the remaining 50 per cent stake in the project.

Located off the Holderness coast, the project consists of 35 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy 6MW direct-drive turbines. It has been in commercial operation since June 2015.

“Westermost Rough is a landmark project in the evolution of the offshore wind industry, both in the UK and internationally,” said Edward Northam, Head of GIG in Europe, noting that it was the first project to commercially deploy the 6MW Siemens Gamesa turbines. “The technical and financial innovations deployed during the development, construction and operation of the wind farm have helped improve performance levels and reduce the cost of wind power generation, making it significantly more cost competitive.”

The move comes just a day after leading offshore wind energy developer Vattenfall announced it had successfully installed the first of its “gigantic, game-changing suction bucket jacket foundations” at the European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC) in Aberdeen Bay.

The milestone takes the project – which was the subject of fierce opposition from Donald Trump, who owns a neighbouring golf course – a major step closer to its goal of delivering enough power to meet 70 per cent of Aberdeen’s demand.

Vattenfall said the new foundations were successfully installed in just 15 hours, after one of the world’s largest floating cranes – the 25,000 tonne Asian Hercules III – was deployed on Sunday to transport the 1,800 tonne structure.

Advocates of the suction bucket foundation design are confident it can significantly reduce the cost of offshore wind turbine foundations, further curbing the cost of the resulting power.

“The EOWDC is a cornerstone of Vattenfall’s and the industry’s drive for innovative cost reduction in offshore wind,” said Gunnar Groebler, Vattenfall’s senior vice president of Business Area Wind. “To be fossil free within one generation a climate smart offshore wind programme embracing science and technology is really important for Vattenfall. Where appropriate, we are keen to see the EOWDC’s novel approach to foundations – along with all its other innovations – rolled out to the rest of the industry.”

Source: businessgreen.com

Vestas To Test Solar & Wind Hybrid System In Spain

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In a press release today the renewable energy companies Vestas and Energias de Portugal Renováveis (EDPR) describe a hybrid demonstration setup based on wind and solar photovoltaics to be installed at an EDPR wind farm in Cádiz, Spain.

An array of 372 kW of solar photovoltaics will be coupled to an existing Vestas V112-3.0 MW turbine. The PV power is fed to the turbine as direct current, which is then converted and transformed by a modified power conversion system inside the turbine before the power is exported to the grid. This setup is expected to increase the overall capacity factor and annual energy production.

For the project, Vestas has upgraded the technical specifications of the turbine’s controllers, converters and design as well as installed new hardware. By connecting wind and solar through the turbine’s power electronics and utilising its full-scale converter, the number of converters is reduced, contributing to lower equipment costs and thus cost of energy.

Bo Svoldgaard, Vestas’ Senior Vice President, Innovation and Concepts adds:

“This project demonstrates the mutual benefits of collaboration between Vestas and EDPR and how wind and solar through their complementarity bring cost of energy further down and can deliver stable energy production. The learnings will accelerate the execution on our strategy of integrating and combining renewable power as the market looks to absorb more renewable energy in the future.”

This is a very smart move in order to get more knowledge on how to improve on the problem of intermittency in renewables. It will be interesting to see whether this approach of mixing wind and solar at the facility itself will further reduce the need for battery storage. The lesser the intermittency the lesser storage capacity is needed to even out the last bumps to secure a stable supply of electricity to the consumer. CleanTechnica covered one such partnership between Vestas and Northvolt last year.

It is an absolute competitive advantage for utility companies to increase the overall capacity factor on pure renewables. In this case, it’s a clever way of using existing technology to bring down costs further.

Source: cleantechnica.com

‘Repowering’ Older Onshore Wind Turbines Could Save Billpayers Millions, Analysis Finds

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Upgrading the UK’s existing onshore wind farms as they reach the end of their operational lives would provide a highly cost-effective way to boost cheap, low carbon electricity generation for years to come, a new analysis today by think tank ECIU concludes.

In England, Wales, and Scotland owners of more than 750 turbines across nearly 60 sites that were installed around the turn of the millennium will face a decision when these wind farms reach the end of their scheduled operation in the next five years, the report points out.

But the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) argues that rather than dismantling such sites or extending their lease and planning consent to keep them in operation as before, onshore wind farm owners should seek to ‘repower’ their sites to the latest and most efficient equipment.

Upgrading these wind farms could increase the UK’s generating capacity by more than 1.3GW compared to shutting them down, the analysis found, yielding enough power to meet the needs of almost 800,000 homes.

Moreover, it estimates that repowering these turbines could save consumers more than £77m a year on their bills while also helping the UK towards meeting its legally binding climate change targets.

Report author, ECIU energy analyst Dr Jonathan Marshall, said electricity from upgraded, more efficient onshore wind farms would be “significantly cheaper” than that from existing, older turbines.

Unlike the earliest wind farms installed in the early 1990s when the technology was in its infancy, the renewables industry has developed significantly so that modern wind farms are now cost competitive with fossil fuel power stations, he explained.

“It makes sense to repower sites of the earliest wind farms, which tend to be in locations that have the best wind resource,” said Marshall. “Existing infrastructure including network connections can also be reused or upgraded at costs lower than for new sites.”

The findings were welcomed by industry groups. Manufacturing organisation EEF said the option for repowering onshore wind farms “should be on the table” as a means of reducing industrial energy costs.

Meanwhile, RenewableUK executive director Emma Pinchbeck called for new and repowered onshore projects to be able to compete for clean power contracts, which she said would enable them to generate “low cost, subsidy-free electricity”.

The findings come as forecasts suggest global wind power capacity could double by 2027 due to the growing offshore sector and increasing demand for renewable energy in emerging markets.

Renewable energy consultancy MAKE’s latest wind market outlook report estimates global wind power capacity additions could average more than 65GW each year over the coming decade, resulting in an annual growth rate of around four per cent through to 2027.

However, success over the next 10 years will depend on the global wind power industry’s ability to continue securing contracts at competitive auctions and delivering awarded capacity on time and within budget, the analysis noted.

“The precipitous drop in pricing globally over the last year, particularly in the offshore sector, is certainly a rallying point for industry achievement, but it needs to be proven,” MAKE said.

In related newds, there was further record-breaking news for the European wind energy industry this week, with Spain generating enough power from its turbines to meet almost half – 49 per cent – of its electricity needs on Saturday.

According to trade body WindEurope, Spain generated 343GWh of electricity from wind turbines that day, a marking a new record for the country.

Source: businessgreen.com

Highest Ever Quarterly Solar Manufacturing Capacity Expansion Announcements In Q4’17

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Mark Osborne, the Senior News Editor for PV Tech, revealed last week that the fourth quarter of 2017 saw the highest ever recorded levels of new solar PV manufacturing expansion announcements for a quarter, totaling around 40 gigawatts (GW) across the thin-film, solar cell & module assembly, and integrated cell & module manufacturing segments.

When it comes to the inside-baseball of solar manufacturing and production, PV Tech provides some of the most important and up-to-date information, thanks in large part to the work of Mark Osborne and Solar Media’s Head of Solar Intelligence, Finlay Colville. Mark Osborne specifically has long been covering the various solar PV manufacturing expansion announcements and the resulting impacts of such announcements.

Earlier this year, Osborne highlighted the fact that expansion announcements fell dramatically in the third quarter due in large part to the huge expansion plans announced over the first half of the year.

However, writing late last week, Mark Osborne revealed that fourth quarter announcements blew out expectations, resulting in “the highest recorded gigawatts of new expansion announcements” for a quarter. Specifically, announcements totaled around 40 GW across the various segments, a massive shift from the 50 GW recorded during the first half of the year and the under 5 GW announced during the third quarter.

More specifically, there was a total of 1.2 GW worth of thin-film expansion plans, in excess of 28 GW of c-Si solar cell expansion plans, and nearly 10 GW worth of module assembly plans. There was also another 5 GW worth of speculative plans, but even if you dismiss these plans until they are made more concrete, the fourth quarter still beat out all records since the beginning of 2014.

Osborne is quick to note, however, that “the nature of PV manufacturing capacity expansion announcements” is not necessarily written in stone, and that “the devil is in the detail and lack of detail as always should be followed by a level of cynicism that such plans ever leave the drawing board.” What comes to pass need not necessarily match up neatly with what was announced or predicted.

Mark Osborne’s full rundown on the fourth quarter, including monthly reviews and an update on the ‘Silicon Module Super League’ (SMSL) members, can be read in full here.

Source: cleantechnica.com

Global Wind Power Capacity To Double By 2027, Claims MAKE Consulting

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

MAKE Consulting has predicted that annual wind power capacity additions will average out at more than 65 gigawatts (GW) between 2018 and 2027, thanks in part to the increasing demand in offshore wind and the expanding contribution of emerging markets.

MAKE Consulting, which is now a part of research and consultancy group Wood Mackenzie, published new figures on Friday for the global wind market over the next 10 years. The research, which focused less on resulting capacity and more on regional trends, forecasts annual wind power capacity additions will average out at more than 65 GW from 2018 to 2027. Specifically, MAKE highlights “incentive expirations and markets adjusting to new auction mechanisms” as resulting in a more than 30% increase in annual capacity additions between 2017 and 2020. Further, and fortunately, a second increase in additions will take place between 2023 and 2027 due to the “realization of offshore ambitions and sustained momentum from emerging markets globally.”

However, such success is reliant on the global wind energy industry’s ability to continue winning capacity awards at auction, and being able to deliver on time and within budget.

Digging into regional specifics, MAKE predicts that the outlook in Europe will depend more and more on the success of the offshore wind energy sector, which it predicts will account for more than a quarter of new capacity added between 2018 and 2027. Specifically, offshore wind will expand to account for 50% of new capacity in Northern Europe, with the UK unsurprisingly accounting for the majority of this capacity, although Denmark will contribute in the near-term, and Sweden and Ireland will contribute in the long-term.

Offshore wind will be less important in the rest of Europe, however, contributing only 10% in Western Europe over the next ten years, with France, Germany, and the Netherlands each expected to add more than 5 GW. As for onshore, Germany and France will dominate here. In Southern Europe, a total of 40 GW of new wind capacity is expected. Spain and Turkey will together add more than 13 GW worth of wind power capacity over the next ten years, and Italy will similarly contribute thanks to its new energy plan. Markets in Eastern Europe will contribute annual additions in excess of 1 GW from 2019.

China’s wind industry will take a little time to get its motor running following the National Energy Administration’s warning mechanism, but as curtailment levels drop and wind power consumption increases, annual capacity levels will begin to rise. Specifically, MAKE predicts that annual capacity additions will exceed 3 GW between 2022 and 2027. Australia will see two good years of over 1 GW each in 2018 and 2019 before a considerable drop-off due to government apathy. India, on the other hand, will see annual growth through 2022.

The forecast for wind in North America is much less impressive, however, after the US narrowly avoided “complete disaster through tax reform negotiations at the end of 2017” which resulted in modified timelines and pushing some capacity into the 2019-20 growth bubble. Annual capacity additions will drop off “considerably” post 2021, to the tune of nearly a threefold decrease in average annual capacity additions between 2022 and 2027 compared to the four years prior.

Near-term growth in Latin America is heavily reliant upon a small number of countries, including Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Sustained long-term growth is expected with the addition of new markets from 2020.

Annual capacity additions are expected to triple in the Middle East and Africa in 2027 compared to 2018 as a result of contributions made by emerging markets.

Source: cleantechnica.com

‘Energy Transition City’: China Targets Lowest-Carbon Winter Olympics Yet

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

China’s plans to deliver a green winter Olympics in 2022 stepped up a gear on Saturday with news of a deal to brand co-host Zhangjiakou as China’s first ‘energy transition city’.

Under a partnership struck with the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) and the People’s Government of Hebei Province, Zhangjiakou will develop a renewable energy roadmap, with the aim of generating at least 50 per cent of its power from renewable sources by 2020.

There are also plans for the city’s Olympic Zone to be certified as low carbon, with both the Olympics centre and stadium powered by renewable energy. The moves are part of a wider plan to exploit the region’s strong wind, solar, and biomass potential.

“The pursuit of a low-carbon Winter Olympics in 2022 will not only support China’s ambition to lower harmful emissions, but it will also see them pioneer a movement towards the cost-effective decarbonisation of the world’s greatest spectacles,” IRENA director-general Adnan Amin said in a statement. “This agreement reflects the Agency’s deepening cooperation with China and will facilitate a positive, two-way exchange of expertise and knowledge.”

The 2022 Games will be the first major global sporting event hosted by China since the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

Beijing is also co-host of the 2022 Winter Games, depite being around 200km away from Zhangjiakou.

The push for a ‘green Games’ in 2022 follows pressure from campaigners such as Greenpeace, which after the location of the 2022 Winter Games was announced called on China to deliver the “most advanced environmental vision, determination and technologies” at the event.

Source: businessgreen.com

Research Finds Extreme Temperature Fluctuations Linked To Increased Rates Of Heart Attacks

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Temperatures along the East Coast began fluctuating wildly last month, from winter-like cold one day — which is normal for February — to summer-like hot the next day — which is anything but. This is a portentous harbinger of global climate change, and an irksome turn of events, as it forced people to switch their clothes, thermostats and ceiling fans from one day to another.

As it turns out, such abrupt temperature swings also may be bad for your health. Cardiology researchers in Michigan recently linked extreme day-to-day changes in temperatures to a significant increase in heart attacks, a finding that raises the disturbing possibility of yet another harmful effect of our warming planet on human health.

“Global warming is expected to cause extreme weather events, which may, in turn, result in large day-to-day fluctuations in temperature,” said Hedvig Andersson, a cardiology researcher at the University of Michigan. “Our study suggests that such fluctuations in outdoor temperature could potentially lead to an increased number of heart attacks and affect global cardiac health in the future.”

Many harmful health effects of climate change are well established, ranging from the worsening of seasonal allergies and the spread of infectious diseases, to the deadly impact of heat waves, floods and drought, among others.

Existing evidence also suggests that climate change already is tied to heart problems, from the dangerous effects of air pollution, including from climate-fueled wildfires, to that of stress, a known risk factor for heart disease. In 2016, for example, New Orleans cardiology researchers reported a three-fold rise in heart attacks in the years after Hurricane Katrina struck, likely due to the stress-induced struggles that many residents endured relocating and rebuilding in the aftermath of the storm.

The Michigan scientists, who reported their findings during a recent meeting of the American College of Cardiology, noted there is a large body of scientific evidence showing the detrimental effects of outdoor temperatures on the rate of heart attacks, including high humidity, as well as extreme heat and cold, with cold weather bringing the highest risk. But most of the earlier research has focused on overall daily temperatures. This new study is among the first to look at the relationship between heart attacks and sudden temperature deviations.

Along with overall heating, climate change is expected to produce more extreme weather events, heat waves and cold snaps, depending on where people live. There is some evidence that climate change — and Arctic warming in particular — may be leading to a more meandering jet stream, which is producing greater extremes in heat, rainfall, drought, etc. in mid-latitude regions like the United States, one reason parts of the nation are experiencing such dramatic temperature swings at odd and unexpected times.

“While the body has effective systems for responding to changes in temperature, it might be that more rapid and extreme fluctuations create more stress on those systems, which could contribute to health problems,” Andersson said, adding that scientists still don’t know the precise underlying mechanism that may be at work.

Hitinder Gurm, professor of medicine and associate chief clinical officer at Michigan Medicine — another of the researchers involved in the study — stressed that their findings don’t necessarily prove that sudden temperature fluctuations are the cause of more heart attacks, and people should continue to focus on other contributing risk factors, such as smoking, hypertension and high cholesterol.

“We know that smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, obesity and lack of exercise are strongly associated with heart disease, and they are modifiable,” he said. “People should focus on these because we know that changing them can make a difference. Currently the best thing a person can do is take care of these. Those are way more important than worrying about temperatures. However, with expected changes in global climate and weather patterns, this is something we need to study because it’s not only the future, but is happening today, and could become an important public health issue.”

The research is based on data from more than 30,000 patients who were treated at 45 Michigan hospitals between 2010 and 2016. All of them had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention, a procedure used to open clogged arteries, after being diagnosed with ST-elevated myocardial infarction, the most serious form of heart attack.

The researchers calculated the temperature fluctuation preceding each heart attack based on weather records for the hospital’s ZIP code, defining daily temperature fluctuation as the difference between the highest and lowest recorded on the day of the heart attack.

Overall, the results showed the risk of a heart attack increased by about 5 percent for every five-degree Celsius jump in temperature differential, or 9 degrees Fahrenheit. Changes of more than 25 degrees Celsius, or 45 degrees Fahrenheit, were linked to a greater increase in heart attack rates compared to a smaller increase with temperature swings of 10 to 25 degrees Celsius, or 18–45 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the researchers.

The effect was more pronounced on days with a higher average temperature. In other words, a sudden temperature swing seemed to have a greater impact on warmer days, the researchers said. Based on their calculations, the researchers predicted there could be nearly twice as many heart attacks on a hot summer day with a temperature fluctuation of 35 to 40 degrees Celsius, or 63 to 72 degrees Fahrenheit, than on days with no fluctuation. “That is a striking increase,” Gurm said.

The researchers adjusted for precipitation totals, day of the week and seasonal trends to isolate the effects of daily temperature fluctuations from other potential environmental factors.

“Generally, we think of heart attack risk factors as those that apply to individual patients and we have, consequently, identified lifestyle changes or medications to modify them,” Gurm said. “Population-level risk factors need a similar approach. Temperature fluctuations are common and [often] predictable. More research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms for how temperature fluctuations increase the risk of heart attacks, which would allow us to perhaps devise a successful prevention approach.”

Source: cleantechnica.com