Home Blog Page 176

The Honda e Electric Car Is Cute, Practical and Efficient. It Will Never Sell in America

Photo-illustration: honda.co.uk

The Honda e electric car is a perfect example of a car nobody in America wants. It is not faster than a speeding bullet. It cannot leap tall buildings in a single bound. It can’t haul a tandem horse trailer over the Eisenhower Pass. It doesn’t have room for an entire NBA team and it won’t outperform a Porsche 911. So, what good is it?

Photo-illustration: honda.co.uk

The people at Honda see things differently. Kohei Hitomi, head of the e Prototype project team, says, “If we look at the market at the moment, there is a trend where manufacturers are competing with each other with driving range. Consequently, batteries are getting bigger and heavier. From Honda’s perspective, this is counterproductive because that makes cars bigger and impractical for city usage. We believe a range of more than 200 km with charging up to 80 per cent in 30 minutes is practical for daily usage — not always carrying a huge and heavy battery around for maybe that one time at the end of the week where you have to drive long distance.”

And that’s why the Honda e won’t be coming to America. It has designed the car it thinks people need, not the car they want. Which is a shame. The Honda e is an efficient package that should be entertaining to drive given its light weight, 148 horsepower, 221 foot-pounds of torque, rear-wheel-drive configuration, and 50/50 weight distribution. It will come with a 35.5 liquid-cooled battery and a projected 200 km (124 mile) range. An 80% recharge in 30 minutes is also part of the package.

But only people in France, Germany, Norway, and the UK will get to enjoy all its goodness. Honda has no plans to sell the car in America, where people prefer to drive a turbodiesel quad cab pickup truck to work 50 weeks a year just so they can tow the ski boat up to the lake house in the summer. The idea that they could rent a truck for 2 weeks when they need it and drive a more efficient vehicle the rest of the year never would occur to them.

The Honda e bears a striking resemblance to the original Honda Civic that went into production in 1972. Back then, conventional wisdom said nobody wanted small, efficient cars. Many predicted Honda would soon go bankrupt. Oddly, we hear the same refrain all the time today when it comes to Tesla. Some people never learn. 

Author: Steve Hanley

Source: cleantechnica.com

Amazon Destruction Accelerates 60% to One and a Half Soccer Fields Every Minute

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Ryk Porras)

Amazon deforestation accelerated more than 60% in June over the same period last year, in what environmentalists say is a sign that the policies of President Jair Bolsonaro are starting to take effect.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Ryk Porras)

The rate of rainforest destruction had been stable during the first few months of Bolsonaro’s presidency but began to soar in May and June, according to Brazil’s National Institute of Space Research (INPE), a government agency whose satellites also monitor the Amazon.

769.1 square kilometres were lost last month – a stark increase from the 488.4 sq km lost in June 2018, INPE’s data showed. That equates to an area of rainforest larger than one and a half soccer fields being destroyed every minute of every day.

More than two-thirds of the Amazon are located in Brazil and environmental groups blame far-right leader Bolsonaro and his government for the increase, saying he has relaxed controls on deforestation in the country.

“Over the past six months, Bolsonaro and his environment minister have been devoting themselves to the dismantling of the Brazilian environmental governance and neutralizing regulatory bodies”, Carlos Rittl, executive secretary of the environment NGO network Observatorio do Clima (Climate Observatory) told CNN.

Greenpeace called Bolsonaro and his government a “threat to the climate equilibrium” and warned that in the long run, his policies would bear a “heavy cost” for the Brazilian economy. “Bolsonaro already accounts for gigantic setbacks for the environment and for Brazil’s image”, Márcio Astrini, a spokesman for Greenpeace in Brazil said in a statement on Friday.

CNN asked the Brazilian Environment Ministry for comment on the recent numbers but has not received a response.

Delivering on a campaign promise

During Bolsonaro’s election campaign, he promised his government would focus on recovering the Brazilian economy and said he would look at ways of exploring the Amazon’s economic potential. Six months after his inauguration, the populist president is certainly delivering on his promises.

“The strong indication of the increase in the deforestation rate during the government of Jair Bolsonaro shouldn’t surprise anyone,” Rittl said. “It’s, after all, the accomplishing of a campaign promise: Bolsonaro was the first president in all of Brazil’s history to be elected with an openly anti-environmental and anti-indigenous speech”.

Rittl says loggers, farmers and miners emboldened by Bolsonaro’s pro-business stance have jumped on the opportunity, taking advantage of reduced controls and less oversight to seize control of a growing area of land within the Amazon forest.

Meanwhile, the government is hampering the efforts of those who are supposed to keep deforestation in check.

The Brazilian Environment and Renewables Institute (IBAMA), the country’s environmental enforcement agency, has seen its budget cut by $23 million, and six months in, the government has only nominated the heads of four of IBAMA’s 27 state offices. None of those four are located in states with jurisdiction over the Amazon rainforest.

In addition, official data obtained by Observatorio do Clima and sent to CNN shows the number of operations IBAMA has conducted in 2019 has gone down since the beginning of the year, around the same time Bolsonaro was sworn in.

“The explosion of the number of [deforestation] alerts in the past couple of months should lead to an intensification of inspection operations, but that hasn’t happened,” Rittl said.

He also put some of the blame on some European countries. “As much as European leaders have made ‘beautiful’ speeches showing concern about Bolsonaro’s environmental policies, and even though the [Paris Climate] agreement has environmental safeguards, the EU is signaling that it is at least tolerant with the ongoing anti-environmental agenda”.

International criticism

French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have both said they were concerned about the erosion of environmental protections in Brazil, but neither France, Germany or the European Union have gone beyond words. Last Friday, the European Union struck a deal with the South American trade bloc Mercosur, which includes Brazil, a move environmentalists say will only put additional pressure on the Amazon and its fragile ecosystem.

The Amazon forest is often referred to as the planet’s lungs, producing 20 per cent of the oxygen in the earth’s atmosphere. It is considered vital in the ongoing efforts to slow down global warming and it is also home to uncountable species of fauna and flora. With roughly half the size of the United States of America, it is the largest rainforest on the planet.

Its area has been steadily shrinking over the past century with deforestation reaching its peak in 1995, when 29.059 km² were lost. The rate of destruction had then been decreasing, reaching its lowest point in 2012.

It has been accelerating ever since.

Source: CNN

EU Requires Carmakers to Add Fake Engine Noises to Electric Cars

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Electric vehicles have been hailed as part of the answer to the climate crisis, but for some people they represent a new danger.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Pedestrians can struggle to hear quiet electric and hybrid vehicles coming, which presents a particular risk for blind and visually impaired people. But as of Monday, all new models of electric and hybrid vehicles developed and sold in the European Union must come equipped with an acoustic sound system.

Vehicles will have to produce a sound when reversing, or driving below 12 miles per hour, according to the UK government. The sound, produced by an acoustic vehicle alert system (AVAS), will be similar to that of a standard internal combustion engine, and drivers will be able to temporarily disable it if they want.

The measure was passed by the European Parliament in 2014, according to a press release from the European Commission, and a five-year transitional period has now ended.

From July 2021, the regulation will be to all new electric and hybrid vehicles registered in the bloc.

“The government wants the benefits of green transport to be felt by everyone, and understands the concerns of the visually impaired about the possible hazards posed by quiet electric vehicles,” Michael Ellis, the UK’s roads minister, said in a statement. “This new requirement will give pedestrians added confidence when crossing the road.”

The UK’s Royal National Institute of Blind People praised the development.

“After years of campaigning on this issue, we welcome the new regulations,” the RNIB tweeted.

And the charity Guide Dogs welcomed the news as a positive step in reducing the risk posed to vulnerable road users by electric and hybrid vehicles, while calling on the UK government to take further action.

“We’re calling on the government to take this announcement further by requiring AVAS on all existing electric and hybrid vehicles and to ensure drivers have them switched on,” John Welsman, guide dog owner and Guide Dogs staff member, said in a statement.

Some manufacturers, including Toyot and Jaguar, have already developed AVAS systems for their electric vehicles, while BMW has enlisted top film score composer Hans Zimmer to make driving sounds for the electric BMW Vision M Next concept car.

The sounds, recorded with Renzo Vitale, acoustic engineer and sound designer at the BMW Group, may be used in the German automaker’s next generation of electric vehicles.

You can listen to the spaceship-like sound effects on the BMW website.

Electric vehicles are an important part of a drive to cut air pollution by reducing the number of gasoline and diesel cars on the roads.

Britain and France will ban sales of new gasoline and diesel cars starting in 2040; India is aiming to make every vehicle sold run on electricity by 2030; and Norway has said all new passenger cars and vans sold in 2025 should be zero-emission vehicles. China, the world’s largest car market, is working on a plan to ban the production and sale of vehicles powered only by fossil fuels.

By 2040, electric cars could make up 57% of all passenger car sales worldwide, according to an analysis by Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Source: CNN

New Cross-Sector Project Targets Wind Turbine Blades Recycling

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The wind energy industry in Europe has joined forces with two other industry bodies to tackle the issue of turbine blades waste.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

WindEurope, the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) and the European Composites Industry Association have developed a cross-sector platform to advance novel approaches to recycle wind turbine blades.

Turbine blades are made up of a composite material, which boosts the performance of wind power by allowing lighter and longer blades.

WindEurope suggests around 2.5 million tons of composite material are currently used in the wind energy industry and with around 12,000 turbines expected to be decommissioned over the next five years, broadening the recycling options is crucial.

Currently, composite materials are being recycled at a commercial scale through cement co-processing, where the cement raw materials being partially replaced by the glass fibres and fillers in the composite and the organic fraction replaces coal as a fuel.

WindEurope says the carbon output of the cement manufacturing process can be significantly reduced through this process, with the possibility of up to 16% reduction if composites represent 75% of cement raw materials.

CEO Giles Dickson adds: “Wind energy is an increasingly important part of Europe’s energy mix. The first generation of wind turbines are now starting to come to the end of their operational life and be replaced by modern turbines. Recycling the old blades is a top priority for us and teaming up with the chemical and compositors industries will enable us to do it the most effective way.”

Source: Energy Live News

Heat Stress Could Destroy 80m Jobs and Cost $2.4bn a Year

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

An increase in heat stress at work linked to climate change is projected to cost the global economy the equivalent of $2.4 billion (£1.9bn) a year and lead to tens of millions of job losses.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

That’s according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO), which warns heat stress will have a massive impact on global productivity and economic losses.

Heat stress refers to heat in excess of what the body can tolerate without suffering physiological impairment and generally occurs at temperatures above 35°C, in high humidity.

The ILO’s projections, based on a global temperature rise of 1.5°C by the end of this century, suggests the world could see 2.2% of total working hours lost in 2030 because of higher temperatures.

That’s equivalent to the loss of 80 million full time jobs and $2.4 billion.

The report cautions this is a conservative estimate as it assumes the global mean temperature rise will not exceed 1.5°C and work in construction and agriculture – two of the sectors worst affected by heat stress – are carried out in the shade.

The regions losing the most working hours are expected to be southern Asia and western Africa, where around 5% of working hours are projected to be lost in 2030, corresponding to 43 million and nine million jobs respectively, with women the most affected.

In addition, people in the poorest regions are to suffer the most significant economic losses, particularly as they have fewer resources to adapt effectively to increased heat.

The ILO calls for greater efforts to design, finance and implement national policies to address heat stress risks and protect workers, including adequate infrastructure and improved early warning systems for heat events.

Catherine Saget, Chief of Unit in the ILO’s Research department and one of the main authors of the report said: “The impact of heat stress on labour productivity is a serious consequence of climate change, which adds to other adverse impacts such as changing rain patterns, raising sea levels and loss of biodiversity.

“In addition to the massive economic costs of heat stress, we can expect to see more inequality between low and high income countries and worsening working conditions for the most vulnerable, as well as displacement of people. To adapt to this new reality appropriate measures by governments, employers and workers, focusing on protecting the most vulnerable, are urgently needed.”

Source: Energy Live News

UK to Put Climate Crisis and Environment at the Heart of Overseas Aid

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The UK will have an “ethical” development policy that puts the climate emergency and environmental protection at the heart of overseas aid, with more than £190m to be spent directly on climate-related issues in the first initiative, the government has announced.

Rory Stewart, the international development secretary, said he hoped this sum would soon be doubled and “run to billions rather than hundreds of millions” within a few years.

But he noted even this would not be enough given the massive international lack of funding for the climate. “Particularly in the midst of a leadership campaign, people talk as if we are spending eye-watering sums [on international aid], but … the global funding gap on climate change is $2.5tn. We are only just scratching the surface,” he said.

However, Stewart’s ambition of increasing spending on the environment may not become lasting government policy, as he is likely to be reshuffled when either Boris Johnson or Jeremy Hunt becomes prime minister. He recently said it would be “heartbreaking” to leave the post.

Of the initial £193m, about £100m will be spent on low-carbon energy and projects to cut carbon emissions in the developing world. The remainder will be split among projects to help developing countries adapt to the effects of global heating, and agriculture, including developing crops that are less susceptible to heat, drought and floods.

An unspecified tranche of the £193m is likely to be spent in the UK, as institutions around the world will be invited to bid to undertake research and development into technology that can reduce emissions and help people adapt to global heating. For instance, weather forecasting data is essential to helping people become resilient to the effects of the climate crisis, such as floods and droughts, and communications technology is needed to ensure people gain access to forecasts in a timely manner.

Current ways of measuring the success of overseas aid spending might also have to change, Stewart suggested. The focus on increasing the GDP of developing countries was “based on calculations the development economists of the 1960s pursued – a very narrow model for growth, still in use in the Treasury and DfID [Department for International Development]”.

Stewart said there was “no simple mathematical formula” that translated investment into long-lasting effects on the ground, and in many cases, development was not a simple transfer of cash, because local politics and other circumstances determined whether projects succeeded. “The secret is not numbers; the secret is values. This is ultimately an ethical project, and DfID has a moral purpose,” he declared.

Instead, Stewart said, the results of spending should be looked at on a variety of measures, including wellbeing, resilience to climate change, building communities and reducing environmental harm.

Stewart also took aim at China, saying the Belt and Road initiative to increase Beijing’s influence in developing countries was “pushing fossil fuels”. He suggested the UK’s soft power could be brought to bear by “leaning in” to China to discuss ways of using low-carbon energy instead.

By putting consideration of the climate and environmental protection into every project DfID pursues, Stewart said, overseas aid could be transformed. “If we can get this right, you can imagine international development, climate change and the environment as a single thing, not a series of weird trade-offs,” he said.

“All development policies must be ethical. The key is in partnerships – it’s not us giving lessons to other people; it’s about sharing. In the end, all politics must be morally purposed.”

Stewart gained plaudits for his passionate performance in the Tory leadership campaign, before being knocked out, leaving either Johnson or Hunt to become the next British prime minister.

Source: Guardian

Wimbledon Is Cutting Back on Plastic at This Year’s Tournament

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Shep McAllister)

Wimbledon is hoping to cut down on the amount of plastic waste generated at this year’s tennis championships.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Shep McAllister)

One big change is that all of the water bottles sold and given out at the two-week long tournament will be made from 100% recycled plastic that can be recycled once fans are done with them.

Tournament water sponsor Evian says it plans to make all of its bottles out of 100% recycled plastic by 2025. The company said it hopes to sell about 420,000 bottles of water at this year’s tournament, which runs from July 1 to 14.

Spectators are also allowed to bring their own reusable water bottles and organizers say there are more than 100 fountains and water refill stations on the grounds.

Almost 475,000 people attended Wimbledon last year, making it the largest single annual sports catering operation in Europe.

Organizers say that cutlery and most of the drink cups used during Wimbledon are made from 100% recycled material and the containers used for their famous strawberries and cream are made from 70% recycled plastic.

They sell an average of 166,055 portions of strawberries and cream each year.

There will also be employees encouraging sustainability and making sure people throw their recycling in the right bins.

Wimbledon has also stopped putting players’ freshly-restrung rackets into plastic bags, which means 4,500 fewer bags will be used during the tournament.

In June, the All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) signed on to the UN Sports for Climate Action Framework.

“We believe that Wimbledon, along with other major events, has a vital role to play in helping to protect the environment, today and for the future, and we are proud to be a signatory to the UN Sports for Climate Action Framework,” said AELTC Chief Executive Richard Lewis in a statement.

Organizers of Glastonbury, the huge UK music festival that wrapped up on June 30, banned single-use plastic bottles at the five-day event and sold sandwiches in 100% compostable packaging.

The European Parliament voted in March to ban a variety of single-use plastic items, including straws and cutlery, by 2021.

Source: CNN

Brazil’s Clean Capacity to Top 60GW in 2030?

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Renewable energy capacity in Brazil is forecast to exceed 60GW by 2030.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

That’s the prediction from analytics firm GlobalData, which expects the nation’s overall renewable power capacity, excluding small hydropower, will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 6% over the period.

This will see total capacity soar from 31GW in 2018 to 60.8GW in 2030, largely due to increased renewable energy auctions and government initiatives such as tax incentives, smart metering, renewable energy targets and favorable grid access policies.

It notes solar photovoltaic and onshore wind markets are expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 14% and 6% respectively, making renewable energy the second largest contributor to the country’s energy mix by 2030.

At 18% of the grid, it will follow only thermal generation, which is expected to make up 28% of Brazil’s capacity.

Arkapal Sil, Power Industry Analyst at GlobalData, said: “The connection of over 25,000 power systems, mostly solar photovoltaic systems to the Brazilian grid in mid-2018 under the net metering scheme, further underpins the renewable growth pattern over the forecast period.

“The main challenges for Brazil’s power sector are its over-dependence on cheap hydropower for baseload capacity and lack of a robust power grid infrastructure.”

Source: Energy Live News

Festival Fans ‘Have Carbon Footprint 850% Higher than if They Stayed at Home’

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Feel like going to a festival this summer? Think twice, because you could increase your carbon footprint more than eight-fold.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

That’s the verdict from Cardiff University and Siemens, which have studied a number of festivals across the UK, including Hay Festival, The FA Cup Final and Rugby 6 Nations -they say each year, more than 10.4 million visitors spend an estimated £2.3 billion at festivals and music events across the country.

The food eaten, the water pumped, the electricity used and the waste generated all produce a significant impact on the environment but the new report shows transportation taken getting there and going home is the biggest offender, making up a massive 49% of an average attendees footprint.

It highlights the average distance travelled to and from the event per person is 528 kilometres, creating an ecological footprint 8.5 times larger than if they stayed at home.

Dr. Andrea Collins, Lecturer, School of Geography and Planning, Cardiff University, said: “We have a real passion for festivals here in the UK, they have become part and parcel of the Great British Summer.

“But the vast ecological footprint they make is becoming increasingly hard to ignore and organisers must act now if we are to continue to enjoy festivals in the future.”

Source: Energy Live News

Vanuatu to Ban Disposable Nappies in Plastics Crackdown: ‘We Had No Choice’

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Walaa Khaleel)

It is but a tiny speck in the Pacific Ocean, but the island state of Vanuatu is leading the global fight against plastic waste. The nation, which has already introduced one of the toughest single-use plastic bans in the world, is believed to be the first to propose a ban on disposable nappies, to be phased in at the end of this year.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Walaa Khaleel)

At a meeting in London this week, chaired by Patricia Scotland, the secretary general of the Commonwealth, Vanuatu was hailed as a “champion” nation, one of 12 who are forging ahead in tackling ocean and climate emergency challenges.

The radical proposal to ban disposable nappies, which contain plastic and can take hundreds of years to degrade, has caused uproar among the country’s parents, who complain it will set women, the predominant carers of the islands’ 20,000 babies, back decades.

But the government of the low-lying developing nation, which is already suffering disproportionately from the climate and ecological emergency, with rising sea levels and marine pollution, said it had no choice.

“Vanuatu is safeguarding its future,” said Mike Masauvakalo of the ministry of foreign affairs. “Eventually, plastics find their way into the water and the food chain and at the end of the day, the people of Vanuatu end up consuming [them].

“There was a lot of uproar from the community and women’s groups about the ban,” he added.

He said the task to find a replacement that parents would be happy with posed a challenge, but that they were looking into cotton alternatives.

“It is a long road ahead,” he said. “But knowing my country, we will work it out. Vanuatu is very vocal about the climate emergency. It is visible, we are living it. It is affecting our food supply and our fish populations.”

He said last year’s plastic bag ban was already having an effect in the country, with less plastic waste on the streets and people using fabric and locally made bags.

In the UK, when Michael Gove hinted at a ban on disposable nappies as part of the government’s plastic waste crackdown, it caused such an outcry that he was forced to issue a denial such a move was planned.

Vanuatu’s department of environmental protection said there was a need for a study on the effect on working parents, but that such research had not been carried out to date.

The country announced the ban after research by Commonwealth Litter Programme (CLiP) showed organic waste and disposable nappies represented three-quarters of the total weight of waste produced. It is consulting with businesses to come up with local alternatives and with NGOs, civil society and other groups.

The results of the consultation, which will take place from the 1 December 2019 to 31 December 2020, will be keenly watched by other countries.

Dr Nicholas Hardman-Mountford, Commonwealth head of oceans and natural resources, said small island countries were “canaries in the coal mine” in the face of ocean challenges, but many had taken on stewardship roles. Vanuatu has partnered with the UK as one of nine commonwealth action groups on the issue, he said.

“Innovation is the key to success on the ocean issues,” said Hardman-Mountford. “We need new thinking, not just by governments but by non-government actors.

“Vanuatu does not have a lot of land – they have to take radical action.”

At a four-day meeting in London for 12 Commonwealth countries leading on ocean issues, Scotland said: “Human ingenuity got us to where we are today with our environment, and human ingenuity can get us out of it.”

The first phase of Vanuatu’s anti-plastic waste battle, the ban on plastic bags, straws and polystyrene containers introduced in July 2018, appears to be having an effect.

A month after the ban was introduced, a waste survey showed 12% of household rubbish was plastic, with only 2% plastic bags and other banned items. This compares with 15-18% plastic in 2010 and 2014.

In March, Vanuatu banned other single-use plastic items including plates, cups, stirrers, food containers, egg cartons and flowers.

Source: Guardian

UK Accused of Ignoring Obligations on Aviation Emissions

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The UK and other EU governments are in breach of international obligations by failing to be open about their policies to tackle emissions from aviation, a coalition of NGOs has said.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The group is lodging a formal complaint over the secrecy surrounding regulation of emissions from international flights, which they say allows the aviation industry to be a “climate laggard”. Last year, aviation emitted 895m tonnes of carbon dioxide – 2.4% of global energy-related CO2 emissions, according to Carbon Brief. If aviation were a country it would be the sixth biggest emitter in the world.

But the UK and other EU governments are in breach of international obligations relating to the release of environmental information because they are failing to disclose details on cutting emissions, say the NGOs which are part of the International Coalition for Sustainable Aviation. The Aarhus convention, which was agreed in 1998, enshrines the right for everyone to receive environmental information held by public authorities.

The parties to the convention are required to make the necessary provisions so that public authorities contribute to these rights to make them effective.

The coalition of NGOs will raise its complaints on Thursday at a meeting of the working group of members of the convention in Geneva.

The UK, EU and European governments are all members of the International Civil Aviation Organization, a UN body incharge of reducing the carbon footprint of international aviation. But the ICAO has been criticised for its secrecy. Its agenda and discussion documents are not released to the public or the media, and the meetings are held behind closed doors.

Documents do emerge through leaks, but the ICAO rules warn participants that they face “unlimited liability for confidentiality breaches”.

Andrew Murphy of the NGO Transport and Environment said the UK and others were using these rules to avoid releasing their policies, and were therefore in breach of the Aarhus convention.

He said governments had failed to release their submissions to the ICAO environment committee, which meets every three and has drawn up the first scheme for international airlines to declare their emissions, known as Corsia.

Murphy said: “Governments have been using this UN agency’s arcane rules to dodge their obligations under international law. They are required to be transparent in how they regulate aviation emissions. Their secrecy is one of the reasons why the airline sector remains such a climate laggard.”

Under Corsia, international aircraft will this year have to start monitoring their emissions as part of ICAO measures. Central to these measures is a market-based system of purchasing emissions offsets rather than a requirement to directly reduce aircraft emissions.

Air transport companies can reduce the amount of carbon emissions they have to offset by using biofuels. A final decision on the rules around what kinds of biofuels can be used was made last week at an ICAO meeting, but the policy has not been published.

The Guardian asked the ICAO to release details of the policy, but the agency was not able to provide the information in time for publication.

Corsia was agreed in 2016 by the 36 ICAO member countries and has taken until this year to implement. But some believe it will not have the required impact on reducing emissions produced by an aviation industry which predicts passenger numbers doubling to 8.2 billion by 2037.

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport – which sends officials to ICAO meetings – said the UK did not publish official correspondence with the UN body because it is was “not an environmental organisation” and that its work involved confidential information which was commercially sensitive.

“We strive for maximum transparency and recognise the importance of public access to information, which is why we are seeking to improve ICAO practices in this area,” the DfT said. “We are engaging with the ICAO and all its other member states, and will continue working to ensure our international environmental responsibilities are upheld.”

Source: Guardian

Study on 14-Year-Old Disaster Finds Oil Still Leaking into Sea

Photo: YouTube (screenshot)

It’s been more than 14 years since Hurricane Ivan made landfall on the Gulf Coast of the United States as a Category 3 storm, with wind speeds approaching 200 kilometers per hour and a destructive storm surge. Worse is what’s still happening offshore, where an oil platform that collapsed during Ivan continues to leak into Gulf of Mexico waters despite claims from its operators, according to a report released Monday.

Photo: YouTube (screenshot)

The new report from U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) researchers, in partnership with Florida State University, estimates that despite some efforts to plug the wells, at least nine barrels of oil per day are leaking from the remains of the Mississippi Canyon 20 (MC20) drilling platform once operated by Taylor Energy. That’s a conservative estimate: A U.S. Coast Guard containment system placed at the wreck site in May 2019 is capturing an average of 30 barrels per day, and NOAA says the leak may be up to 108 barrels per day.

The findings conflict with Taylor Energy’s contention that oil sheens visible on the Gulf waters since the 2004 storm are released from hydrocarbons trapped in sediments on the ocean floor. In fact, the company – which ceased operation more than a decade ago and now exists only as an entity to deal with the MC20 disaster – has accused the Coast Guard of contributing to the problem while trying to research and remedy the leak.

“Taylor Energy had warned the Coast Guard of the risk of reckless and irresponsible disturbance of the hydrocarbons trapped in the sediment on the seafloor following the collapse of the MC-20 platform.  Now the company’s worst fears are being realized,” the company said in an April statement.

Yet what the new NOAA report establishes, quite apart from oil flow rates, is that the oil isn’t coming from the sediment. It’s coming from the wreckage of the MC20 platform, which was toppled by an undersea mudslide caused by heavy seas and then broke away from its original 28 oil well pipes.

“Scientists conclusively show that the plume is primarily from active oil and gas releases from multiple wells at the MC20 site, rather than from sediments contaminated after 2004,” said NOAA’s National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS). The study results further contradict the Taylor Energy claims that “approximately one drop of oil” is released each minute from a two square foot area on the mud line.

That’s of concern because the Gulf of Mexico supports a highly diverse ecosystem, with fishing and tourism industries as well as the region’s oil and gas industry. “When oil-related chemicals are released into the marine environment they can bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms,” said NCCOS. “Many individual oil-related chemical compounds are toxic, with some being likely carcinogens.”

The report, originally requested by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), will be used to help determine the next steps in dealing with the MC20 leak – which, ironically, came under renewed scrutiny after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster. It was then that observers noticed oil sheens and contamination that weren’t related to the Deepwater crisis and began to investigate what was causing them.

Source: Sustainability Times

Indian Coal Demand Soared 9.1% over Last Year

ugalj
Photo-illustration: Pixabay
ugalj
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

India’s annual coal demand rose 9.1% during the year ending March 2019.

That’s according to India’s Coal Minister, Pralhad Joshi, who said the figure hit 991.35 million tonnes, driven primarily by utilities, which accounted for three-quarters of total demand.

Their coal consumption rose by 6.6% to 760.66 million tonnes over the period.

India is one of the biggest global importers of the fossil fuel, despite having the world’s fifth largest reserves – its imports rose to 235.24 million tonnes last year, up from from 208.27 million tonnes in 2017-18.

The rest of supply was provided through domestic supplies, which rose to 734.23 million tonnes last year, although it was not sufficient to meet total demand – there was a national shortfall of 23.35 million tonnes, around double that of the previous year.

Pralhad Joshi stated this occurred mainly as a result of state-run producer Coal India’s inability to meet surging demand from the country’s cement and iron industries.

He noted to increase future output levels, Coal India is now prioritising starting production at mines with a capacity exceeding 10 million tonnes per year and adopting increasingly mechanised techniques.

The producer is targeting a total production of 660 million tonnes in 2019-20.

The US has signed a deal which will see it help build six new nuclear power plants in India.

Source: Energy Live News

‘Climate Apartheid’ Will See Millions of World’s Poorest Severely Impacted

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

A ‘climate apartheid’ will see millions of the world’s poorest people severely impacted.

That’s the chilling forecast from UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, Philip Alston, who said even if current climate targets are met, tens of millions of people will be impoverished, leading to widespread displacement and hunger.

He said this would likely occur as wealthy nations pay to escape overheating, hunger and conflict “while the rest of the world is left to suffer” in terms of their rights to life, food, housing and water.

In his report, Mr Alston warns a changing climate will also threaten the wider issues of democracy and human rights and could even undo the last 50 years of progress in terms of economic development and global health.

He suggests more than 120 million more people could be pushed into poverty by 2030, with the bulk of these happening in the worst affected locations, such as Bangladesh.

The Special Rapporteur stresses even the best-case scenario of 1.5°C of warming will force many to choose between starvation and migration.

To mitigate these dangers, he says economic well-being and poverty reduction must be decoupled from fossil fuel emissions and calls for strong policies to be implemented to support displaced workers and ensure good jobs remain in affected areas.

He said: “Perversely, while people in poverty are responsible for just a fraction of global emissions, they will bear the brunt of climate change and have the least capacity to protect themselves.

“As a full-blown crisis that threatens the human rights of vast numbers of people bears down, the usual piecemeal, issue-by-issue human rights methodology is woefully insufficient.”

Source: Energy Live News

Will Burberry Set a Green Trend with New 2022 Emissions Goal?

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Sai de Silva)
Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Sai de Silva)

Burberry has committed to slash its direct emissions by 95% in the next three years.

The luxury fashion brand set the target against a 2016 baseline and has had the ambition independently assessed and approved by the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTI), which confirmed it was in line with limiting the trajectory of global warming to 1.5°C.

The company also pledged to reduce its supply chain emissions by 30% by 2030 and announced it is now carbon neutral across its retail operations in the US, Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa.

It says this has been acheived through driving energy efficiency measures through its stores and reinvesting cost savings into the procurement of renewable energy.

In 2017 Burberry set a target to procure 100% of its energy from renewable sources by 2022 – it says it is now on track to meet this goal and notes it sourced 48% of its total energy use from clean generation last year.

The brand has a controversial history when it comes to its environmental footprint – last year it drew criticism from green groups after it was found to be burning its unsold clothes, bags and perfume.

Source: Energy Live News

77 Health Organizations Call for Climate Action to Fight Public Health Emergency

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

More than 70 leading public health groups, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, agree that the climate crisis is also a health emergency.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

So far 77 organizations representing nurses, doctors, hospitals, volunteers and public health professionals have signed on to The Call to Action on Climate, Health and Equity: A Policy Action Agenda, released Monday. The agenda urges government, business and community leaders to take a series of actions designed to promote health and fight climate change.

“We are here today to declare that climate change is a health emergency. Climate change is already harming the health, safety and wellbeing of every American living today and if it is not addressed, will bring untold harm to all our children and grandchildren,” former Acting Surgeon General and Retired U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps Rear Admiral Boris Lushniak said in a transcript of a press call emailed to EcoWatch.

On the call, medical professionals shared how climate change was already impacting the health of their patients. Pediatrician and incoming Chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Environmental Health Dr. Aparna Bole explained how worsening air quality linked to global warming was increasing the risks faced by her patients in a Cleveland, Ohio community where one in five children has asthma.

“In my community, burning fossil fuels contribute to not just asthma exacerbations but also poor birth outcomes like low birth weight and prematurity, both risk factors for infant mortality. Even prenatal exposure leads to neurodevelopmental delays that negatively impact school readiness, which is an important foundation for a child’s academic success,” Bole said.

Meanwhile, Gundersen Health System CEO Emeritus Jeffrey Thompson shared how extreme weather events like hurricanes and wildfires were making it harder for hospitals to care for their patients.

“In the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, many emergency medicine physicians throughout the U.S. were forced to ration critical IV fluids after the hurricane damaged a major producer of IV bags in Puerto Rico. This shortage persisted for months and into flu season. Imagine having to tell a worried mother that you couldn’t give her child fluids that could help him,” Thompson said.

The group outlined six major priorities for policy makers to fight climate change and improve health outcomes:

  • Meet and ramp up Paris agreement commitments.
  • Transition away from coal, oil and natural gas and towards renewable energy.
  • Encourage a shift from driving to biking, walking or public transportation while shifting to zero-carbon transit alternatives.
  • Support sustainable agriculture and protect green spaces.
  • Make sure all communities have safe and sustainable supplies of drinking water.
  • Ensure a “just transition” for workers and communities impacted by climate change.

The group also encouraged health organizations to take climate action by engaging with calls like this one, integrating climate responses into public health plans and assisting vulnerable communities in responding to climate impacts.

Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University Director Ed Maibach told the Associated Press that the health organizations’ statement could shift some Americans’ image of climate change as “primarily as a threat to things in the environment, like polar bears.”

“It’s incredibly helpful when health professionals point out the actual reality of the situation, point out that this is also a threat to our health and well-being now … and it’s likely to get worse, much worse, if we don’t take action to address it,” he said.

The call also comes as climate change is emerging as a major issue in the 2020 election, something Lushniak alluded to in introducing it.

“[W]e are well aware that we are initiating this effort at an important moment when our Nation’s attention is increasingly focused on the most important issues we face and how we should address them,” he said. “Our goal is to influence this national conversation at this critical moment. We are providing our leaders at all levels and with a meaningful path forward.”

The call was released the same week that Democratic candidates will engage in their first debate, the Associated Press pointed out. It shares priorities with the climate policy proposed by candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden, the Associated Press concluded, since it urges a transition away from fossil fuels without endorsing an outright ban on fracking.

Source: Eco Watch