Home Blog Page 153

Microsoft Inks PPA for Dutch Offshore Wind Energy

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Microsoft has signed a new deal to buy electricity from a 713.5MW offshore wind farm in the Netherlands.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

It is purchasing 90MW of power from the Borssele III/IV wind farm under a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Dutch developer Eneco.

Electricity generated from the offshore wind farm will be used to power Microsoft’s data centres for 15 years starting in 2022.

It is Microsoft’s 14th renewable PPA and brings its total clean energy portfolio to more than 1.5GW.

Hans Peters, Chief Customer Officer at Eneco sid: “Tech companies are facing the challenge to reduce their carbon footprints, mostly due to the vast energy consumption of their data centres. A global frontrunner like Microsoft does not see this as a challenge but as an opportunity to boost the energy transition.

“We are proud we can help them switch to a sustainable, smart and clean energy supply in the Netherlands. As a result, Microsoft is creating local opportunity, growth and impact while enabling Eneco to continue to invest in large-scale renewable energy projects like Borssele III/IV.”

Source: Energy Live News

US to Become World’s Largest Market for Grid-Connected Energy Storage

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The US is projected to take over South Korea as the world’s largest market for grid-connected energy storage this year.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

That’s according to new research, which suggests solar combined with battery storage as well as peaking capacity requirements are driving increased procurement.

Deployments of grid-connected energy storage in the US this year is expected to total 712MW, nearly double the amount added in 2018, when capacity stood at 376MW.

The country will surpass South Korea, which is expected to see the market drop below 600MW “or even significantly lower”, says IHS Markit.

It adds a record for grid-connected battery storage was set in 2018 as global installations nearly doubled, largely driven by growth in South Korea in the first half of the year, while growth in the US was slower, with deployments increasing by only around 22%.

The research expects more than 2GW of energy storage to be paired with utility-scale solar power systems over the next three years, with the majority of the projects projected to be deployed in markets across Western US, including Arizona, California and Hawaii.

In terms of installed solar capacity, 10GW of utility-scale projects are forecast to be paired with energy storage systems from 2019 to 2023, accounting for 16% of large installations.

IHS Markit suggests several major factors will fuel growth in the US, including federal policies driving regional grid operators to incorporate additional market mechanisms that will encourage more participation of energy storage resources, the investment tax credit (ITC) currently available for solar and state-level energy storage mandates and incentives helping to kickstart development.

Source: Energy Live News

English Tree Planting Challenge Will Help Plant 130,000 Trees

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

More than 130,000 trees are to be planted in English towns and cities over the next two years as part of the nation’s battle against global heating.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The environment secretary, Michael Gove, will announce on Sunday that grants for the plantings will be made available through the Urban Tree Challenge Fund.

The scheme, which will be administered by the Forestry Commission, will be open to individuals, local authorities, charities and NGOs. Grants will be given to pay for the planting of trees and for the first three years of their care in order to ensure they flourish.

“This will allow us to plant more trees much closer to where people live and work and where the benefits of trees make the most difference,” said the Forestry Commission chair Sir Harry Studholme.

Trees play a crucial role in the fight against global heating – caused by burning fossil fuels that release carbon dioxide – because they store carbon. Trees in cities and towns also absorb noise, reduce flood risk, provide shade in summer and are associated with general good health and wellbeing.

“We need trees lining our streets, not only to green and shade them but to ensure we remain connected to the wonders of the natural world, which is why we must go further and faster to increase planting rates,” added Gove.

A grant for planting a tree will be delivered as a challenge fund, which means that it will require matched funding from those who apply. The scheme will support projects which are considered to be most likely to provide the greatest environmental and social benefits.

A map will be available to check eligibility before applying.“We need to be planting many more trees over the next 25 years,” said Paul Nolan, chair of England’s Community Forests. “So we welcome this new investment.”

Source: Guardian

SEAT Plans to Double Down on Waste Reduction by 2025

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

SEAT has announced plans to slash the amount of waste it produces by 60% before 2025.

The car manufacturer has achieved an environmental footprint reduction rate of 34% each year since 2010 but now plans to significantly step up efforts to produce less carbon dioxide, use fewer volatile organic compounds, generate less waste and consume less water and energy.

It says it will use less materials and optimise waste separation in order to boost recycling and reuse rates, as well as refine paint and sealant slurry that would normally be wasted.

It also aims to recover the heat emitted by the chimneys of its factory in Martorell, Spain, saving a volume of energy equivalent to the annual consumption of 760 households.

Additionally, the firm will transition to water-based paints to reduce use of harmful chemicals at the site.

SEAT has a longer term goal of going carbon-neutral across its entire value chain of vehicles and in every company division by 2050.

Vice-President for Production and Logistics Dr. Christian Vollmer said: “We aim to continue to improve in order to become a model company in every aspect – for the quality and production efficiency of our factories, as well as for finding solutions to the paradigm shift that businesses and society are faced with, where recycling, emissions reduction and environmental care are becoming increasingly more important.”

Source: Energy Live News

Italian Island of Capri Bans Single-Use Plastics

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

If you find yourself on the island of Capri, you’d better not have a plastic fork stuck in your bag, or else you might get a €500 fine. The new ruling, effective May 15, states that no more single-use plastics are allowed on the island, unless they’re made of biodegradable plastic. They can neither be sold by local shopkeepers, nor brought onto the island by visitors.

It is part of a broader effort to combat marine plastic pollution. A recent investigation found that the water separating Capri from the mainland had four times more plastic waste in it than other marine areas around Italy. This has spurred the local government to action, as it does not want its stunning island’s reputation to be sullied by plastic.

Mayor Gianni de Martino told EFE, “We have a very big problem and we have to contribute (to finding a solution). We all have heard about the famous plastic island which exists in the sea… [This new rule will reduce] the pollution problem, improve the selective collection of residue and obviously contribute to taking care of the environment.”

The rule is no different from the one that will be implemented throughout the European Union in 2021, except that it’s taking effect 18 months earlier.

Furthermore, a new regulation has been approved that allows fishermen to collect plastic waste that gets caught in their nets. Previously, “they were forced to dispose of it in order to avoid the charge of illegally transporting residues on land.”

I’m all in favor of Capri’s anti-plastic rule, but the ‘biodegradable’ loophole is an odd one, since biodegradable plastics are not a solution to the waste problem. Studies have proven that so-called biodegradable or compostable plastics do not truly break down and often remain in the natural environment for as long as conventional plastics. They require specific conditions to degrade, such as heat and sunlight; and even when they do fall apart, scientists say further research is needed to determine where the pieces go and what effect they have.

A far better and more sustainable solution would be to ban all plastic single-use disposables and focus rather on reusables. Still, I suppose we must celebrate the little wins, and Capri’s eagerness to get ahead of the curve on this issue – and its understanding of the implications if it does not – is hopeful.

Author: Katherine Martinko

Source: Tree Hugger

Glasgow Aims to Become UK’s First Net-Zero Emissions City

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Glasgow has announced its goal to become the first net-zero carbon emissions city in the UK.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Big Six energy supplier ScottishPower is to help the city council achieve its target of net zero emissions “well before” 2045, working in collaboration on a range of programmes.

That includes the decarbonisation of transport and heating as well as investment in the electricity grid to support a low carbon city.

ScottishPower is planning for the rollout of mass charging points for electric vehicles (EVs) as part of the city’s decarbonisation plans.

Glasgow has so far established the first Low Emission Zone outside of London, intending to phase out the dirtiest buses from the city centre over five years.

Susan Aitken, Glasgow City Council Leader said: “Today I make a commitment that Glasgow is determined to lead the UK’s ‘race to zero’.

“From the research by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to the appeals from our classrooms, our streets and civic squares, we know that emissions reduction is the issue of our times. We simply have to act now and the Glasgow City Government will develop those partnerships necessary to get to where we simply have to be. We need to be a net zero city and we need to be the UK’s first net zero city.”

Keith Anderson, Chief Executive of ScottishPower added: “The maths for going net zero is simple. Renewable energy capacity has to quadruple and electricity generation has to double. We can’t do this if we keep inventing ways to block new renewable capacity. Onshore wind in particular has suffered as a consequence and the time has come for a fundamental rethink.

“We’ve been able to compensate to some extent by racing ahead with large offshore wind projects but quadrupling capacity can’t rely on putting all our eggs in one renewable basket. We’ve said very clearly we will aim to invest £6 billion in renewable capacity by 2022. The easier it is to do this, the quicker we all get to net zero.”

The Scottish city of Edinburgh has also set a provisional target to become net zero by 2039.

Source: Energy Live News

A Pretty Stream in Belgium Is so Polluted Its Water Could Be Used as Pesticide

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The idyllic stream that meanders through the Flemish countryside has been called the most polluted stream in Europe.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

When you think of a polluted waterway, what do you envision? For me, a dark, oil-slicked river studded with garbage comes to mind, or maybe a malodorous and oddly colored creek in an industrial area. What I do not picture is a little stream in the Flemish countryside.

But it is indeed just that, a little stream in the Flemish countryside, that has won the crown as the most polluted small waterway in Europe, according to research from the University of Exeter.

For the study, a group of scientists from the Greenpeace Research Laboratories at the University of Exeter tested 29 small waterways from 10 European countries. What they found is remarkable. Amongst the samples, they discovered more than 100 pesticides – including 24 that are banned in the EU – as well as 21 veterinary drugs.

Not one stream or canal was clean; each contained at least multiple pesticides, and most contained veterinary antibiotics. In 13 of the 29 waterways, concentrations of at least one pesticide exceeded European standards for acceptable levels, says the University.

“There is huge uncertainty about what effects these mixtures of chemicals could have on wildlife and human health,” said Dr Jorge Casado, who led the analytical work.

But it was the pretty little tributary on the outskirts of Ledegem, a village in the Flanders region of Belgium, that was the doozy. The Wulfdambeek sample included 70 hazardous pesticides, including 38 weed killers, 10 insecticides, and 21 fungal killers, reports The Guardian.

The stream was so polluted and in such high concentrations that the water itself would probably work as a pesticide, said Casado.

“It’s incredible,” he said.

“The most important thing to highlight is that there is a lack of ways to assess how this mix of hazardous materials are affecting the ecosystem,” he added.

Pesticides find their way into the water by a variety of routes, from spray drift and leaching to runoff of rainwater. Importantly, however, the research was not designed to call out farmers. Rather, say the researchers, the idea is to bring people and groups from different fields to secure a “flourishing future for humanity.”

“This is not a case of us versus farmers or water companies,” said Dr Paul Johnston, who co-authored the paper.

“This is about using forensic scientific methods to investigate a problem that faces us all. We have to work together to find a holistic solution.”

“Farmers don’t want to pollute rivers, and water companies don’t want to have to remove all that pollution again downstream,” he added, “so we have to work to reduce reliance on pesticides and veterinary drugs through more sustainable agriculture.”

The paper was published in the journal Science of the Total Environment.

Author: Melissa Breyer

Source: Tree Hugger

Norway Approves Extension to Giant Oil Field

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Authorities in Norway have formally approved the development and operation of the second phase of the giant Johan Sverdrup oil field.

Developer Equinor says the extension to the field, with planned start-up in 2022, will increase production from 440,000 barrels of oil per day to 660,000 barrels per day.

Johan Sverdrup is the biggest field development on the Norwegian Continental Shelf since the 1980s – the first phase is nearly 90% completed and production is expected to start this November.

The NOK41 billion (£3.6bn) second development phase will include the construction of a new processing platform, modifications of the riser platform, five subsea systems and preparations for power supply from shore to the Utsira High in 2022.

Emissions reductions from Johan Sverdrup are estimated at more than 620,000 tonnes of CO2 on average per year – equivalent to the emissions from 310,000 cars.

Anders Opedal, Executive Vice President for Technology, Projects and Drilling in Equinor said: “This is a big day for Equinor and the other Johan Sverdrup partners comprising Lundin Norway, Petoro, Aker BP and Total. Johan Sverdrup is a world-class field that will provide value to its owners and society for 50 years ahead with record-low emissions. This truly marks the beginning of the second development phase.”

Source: Energy Live News

Ethical Shoe Company Toms Moves Beyond the Buy One/Give One Model

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Shoppers can now choose to support a broader range of social issues.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

“Wear your beliefs” is a catchy tagline that appears on the TOMS website, and the company is trying to make that more accurate than ever. The maker of simple canvas shoes has long been known for its buy one/give one model that promises a new pair of shoes to someone in the developing world for every pair that is purchased. As successful as it’s been, the company has felt lately that it needs to rethink its iconic business model to better reflect customers’ interests.

Starting May 7, shoppers will be able to choose from five new giving campaigns when purchasing a pair of shoes – providing safe water, ending gun violence, fighting homelessness, supporting mental health, or working toward greater equality and women’s rights. Donating a pair of shoes remains an option as well.

The campaign to end gun violence has been ongoing since November 2018, resulting in a $5 million donation and 700,000 Americans sending postcards to their representatives in Congress to pass legislation that mandates universal background checks. But this campaign does not resonate with everyone, and the company wants to ensure that everyone feels their philanthropic tendencies are supported, hence the broadening of giving campaigns.

There has been some debate over the efficacy of the buy one/give one model that TOMS pioneered and that has become so popular among ethical retailers. Writing for Fast Company, Adele Peters cites concerns about shoe donations disrupting local economies and making people reliant on donations. Although TOMS says studies it has commissioned have not found this to be the case, there’s been an evolution in the way it (and other similar companies) implement donations. Peters writes, “[TOMS has made] sure that shoes are integrated into existing nonprofit programs and not offered on their own, for example. It also started manufacturing in some of the communities it supports to help build local economies.”

In other items sold by the company, TOMS sunglasses “can support cataract surgery and not just a free pair of glasses.” This is similar to Warby Parker’s buy one/give one model for eyeglass frames that “also trains people globally to perform basic eye exams and sell glasses for ‘ultra-affordable’ prices, which may be a better model for communities.”

TOMS’ heart does seem to be in the right place, and as ethical shopping picks up steam (three-quarters of millennials are willing to pay more for items with a ‘sustainable’ story), this company likely isn’t going anywhere. Plus, we love how simple the shoes are, featuring natural materials like hemp and cotton canvas, without a lot of plastic.

And they’re supremely comfortable, which actually has environmental implications. Lloyd just wrote the other day that shoes are an effective tool in the fight against climate change because the most wearable your shoes are, the more likely you are to walk in them – and leave your car at home.

Author: Katherine Martinko

Source: Tree Hugger

Takeout Lunches Generate Obscene Amounts of Packaging Waste

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Eating on the go is costly not only to our wallets, but also to the environment.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Eating lunch on the go generates nearly 11 billion pieces of packaging waste every year – and that’s in Britain alone. New research by environmental charity Hubbub has found that workers buy takeout lunches and snacks much more frequently than they did five years, translating to roughly 276 items per person.

Hubbub’s survey of over 1,200 workers found that the average bought lunch consists of four packaged items, “with 76 percent of shoppers picking up a main item such as a boxed sandwich, 70 percent a packet of crisps or another snack and 65 percent a napkin.”

Sixty-four percent of people surveyed said they shop more for lunchtime food now that they did in the past, partly due to lack of time to prepare their own and the increased appeal and accessibility of pre-packaged meals. The food-to-go industry is now worth a whopping £13.6 billion (US$17.5 billion) a year. (This is estimated to be £9.9 billion more than if lunches were prepared at home.)

All of this comes at a time when we’re becoming more aware than ever of the waste we’re generating – and the need to find sustainable solutions. In response, Hubbub has launched a campaign called Food Savvy Lunch Club to encourage workplaces to reduce single-use plastic and food waste.

The Lunch Club trialled in March in one region of the UK, and results were highly successful. Food waste was cut in half, and the majority (83 percent) of participants reduced single-use plastic use by 54 percent.

The Lunch Club encourages workers to make their own meals and provides a three-week template with recipes. People are encouraged to take their own container to a restaurant for filling; and businesses are urged to get on board with a ‘Take Back, Give Back’ program that offers discounts to people who bring reusable containers.

To quote Trewin Restorick, CEO of Hubbub, from a press release,

“‘Lunch-on-the-go’ items create huge levels of waste and unfortunately much of this isn’t recyclable as it’s made from mixed materials or isn’t recycled due to contamination from food residue. By planning lunches in advance and using up items in your fridge you can massively reduce the amount of packaging you use while saving money by cutting down on food waste. In the UK we could save £58 million a day just by making our own lunches.”

If you’re a business owner, you can get in touch with Hubbub to find out about starting your own Lunch Club.

Author: Katherine Martinko

Source: Tree Hugger

We Have Broader National Awareness of the Need for Personal Engagement

Foto: Unsplsh/ JasperVan DerMeij
Photo: Ambassador USA

It is a well-known fact that in 2017, the United States of America withdrew from the Paris Agreement. By signing it, states have committed themselves to the fight against climate change but above everything, to limiting the average temperature rise that causes global warming.

Ever since then, the current American president has stated a few times that the United States would consider its re-approval if the agreement went through some modifications. Meanwhile, according to the U.S. ambassador in Serbia Kyle Scott, not only that the care about environmental protection has not been missed, but this field, side by side with renewable energy sources, has experienced a boom in his homeland.

In the interview with Kyle Scott, among other things, you will find out how the laws in the field of renewable energy are being passed and learn about the emergence of the ecological movement in the U.S. and about sectors in which Serbia could increase its profit.

EP: EP A’s report for 2015 and 2014 on the US recycling rate was almost at the same level and it was something below 25 per cent. Would you say that this percentage is good enough for the USA regarding the size of the country and population, and eventually, what is being done for its improvement?

Kyle Scott: We can always do better, but our recycling rate has increased from less than 7 per cent in 1960 to the current rate of about 35 per cent, according to the EP A. Recycling is critical not just from an environmental perspective, but also from a business point of view. In fact, a study from the EP A found that every 10,000 tons of materials recycled supports nearly 16 jobs and $760,000 in annual wages. Recycling laws in the U.S. also vary widely between states and cities. In many communities, you can now receive fines for not recycling, while others are not as strict. I also want to point out that the entire green movement behind recycling is truly grassroots. I work for the government but I believe the best solutions often come from individuals and small groups. In the U.S., our environmental movement came from citizens who were frustrated by the lack of progress in their government to protect what is most important to sustaining life: air, water, and food. The Endangered Species Act, Clean Air and Water acts, along with other groundbreaking environmental protection laws from the 1960s and 70s, were adopted by Congress and the President because citizens demanded changes. When I was growing up, for example, I remember reading stories about rivers in industrial parts of the U.S. actually catching fire because they were so polluted. These same rivers now support healthy fish populations.

Photo: Unsplsh/ JasperVan DerMeij

EP: Many American websites promote ecotourism, and it is a significant part for the future progress of tourism. Do you have any data on how important this is for Americans; do you work on promoting this type of tourism and if so, how do you do it?

Kyle Scott: From the coral reefs of Florida to the Great Lakes of the Midwest, and the Grand Canyon of my home state of Arizona, Americans are fanatics about enjoying their vast and beautiful natural landscape. In fact, the world’s first national park, Yellowstone, was established more than a century ago in the American West.

A half-century ago, we passed the Wilderness Act, which protected millions of acres of forest, grassland, and desert from all human development. Not only do these areas protect wildlife and supply us with clean air and water but local communities benefit from tourism. By some estimates, ecotourism contributed more than $730 billion to the U.S. economy last year. As the world becomes more and more crowded, I think ecotourism will become even more important both environmentally and economically speaking. Serbia has incredible potential in this regard. Your rivers, mountains, and forests have the potential to boost local economies by drawing these tourists. People who enjoy nature are often willing to spend a lot of money to have the opportunity to trek the mountains of eastern Serbia, ski the slopes of Kopaonik float down the Tara River, or watch birds in Fruska Gora.

EP: What campaigns have you run in the USA for the promotion of environmental protection, do you still have some that are active and is there any that could be useful to apply in Serbia?

Kyle Scott: The U.S. started massive anti-litter campaigns in the 1950s that focused on changing the actions of individuals – to help people understand that throwing trash from your car, for example, is indeed an insult to your own country. Volunteers routinely spend time cleaning up the environment in their communities. Schools teach children from the youngest ages the importance of protecting the environment and how actions such as dumping waste oil in a stream could poison fish and insects for decades. There’s now a broader national awareness of the need for individual action – the government plays a key role, but in the end, individuals decide whether or not to throw a cigarette butt out their car window, or recycle an aluminum can or use energy-efficient lighting in their homes. I would say that these educational campaigns have been quite successful, but they must start at a young age. As I mentioned earlier, Serbia is blessed with an amazing natural environment. Protecting this resource is good for the planet and will also help bring economic benefits to rural places, which often need them the most.

Prepered by: Nevena Djukic

Read the whole interview in the new issue of the Energy portal Magazine on SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE March – May 2019. 

EU Clean Water Laws Under Attack from Industry Lobbyists

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Industry lobbies are mounting a push to roll back EU clean water regulations, even though less than half of the continent’s rivers, wetlands and lakes are in a healthy state.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The lobby offensive is aimed at weakening the bloc’s floods and water framework directives, which require all states to ensure their waterways are in “good ecological condition” by 2027. Conservation groups say the proposed changes could sound a death knell for several endangered aquatic species.

The campaign by mining, agriculture, hydropower and chemical lobbyists has been backed by five EU states: Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and Finland.

Andreas Baumüller, the head of natural resources at WWF’s European policy office, said: “Rivers, lakes and wetlands are our life support systems but they are being annihilated under our very eyes. We have the legal tool to stop this – the EU water law – but member states must actively stand up to the sectors that pollute and destroy the most.”

A new study by several environmental groups says that proposals for an EU “fitness check” of water rules could allow harmful projects, weaken the “polluter pays” principle and lower the bar for what counts as a “good” ecological condition.

A “one out, all out” rule obliging holistic waterway standards for biodiversity, flow and pollutants is being particularly challenged.

In position papers seen by the Guardian, the Swedish mining company SveMin says the rule “cannot prevail” because of its “severe negative impact on investments”. The document calls for more flexible exemptions and a new definition of a good ecological water state.

The UK’s National Farmers’ Union also wants the rule reviewed for costs to industry and feasibility. Its submission argues that the onset of climate change necessitates a “reality check”, including more derogations from “unachievable” water flow targets.

Europe’s hydropower industry appealed for more consideration of industry costs, subsidiarity principles and dam approvals under EU “non-deterioration” standards.

Ariel Brunner, Birdlife Europe’s policy chief, said such changes “would almost certainly mean the extinction of many aquatic species that are already on the edge: sturgeon, eels, snails and a lot of endemic but localised fish species. But the impacts go way beyond biodiversity.

“With the rapid acceleration of climate change, this could become a question of life or death in places like the Iberian peninsula. If they keep using water at the current rate, when the big drought comes there won’t be any water left.”

While industry lobbyists claim the directive’s rules are too stringent, some EU states argue that the directive would, counterintuitively, be strengthened by incorporating some lobby positions.

An unpublished EU states’ policy paper seen by the Guardian argues that extending the 2027 deadline would increase legislative coherence and compliance, partly because the bloc en masse is unlikely to meet the 2027 benchmarks.

“Allowing more time to meet the objectives on grounds of technical feasibility and disproportionate costs would postpone the moment that good status is achieved,” it says. “However, the level of ambition regarding the environmental objectives would still be retained.”

Brunner said: “Instead of actually cleaning up the water and making it healthy, this debate is about redefining the word ‘healthy’ to include the ‘unhealthy’. It is just dressed up as making targets realistic and achievable.”

More than 375,000 people have signed a petition calling for the water law to remain unchanged.

An EU statement on the fitness check is expected in the autumn, before a vote by environment ministers that should then be ratified by the European parliament in 2020.

Source: Guardian

Finnish Bus Operator Introduces Voluntary Surcharge for Greener Transport

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Finnish bus service provider Savonlinja has announced it is introducing a voluntary surcharge on the ticket price for customers for low-emission journeys.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Called Green Travel, it is being launched in partnership with Neste on all long-distance travel to reduce the bus operator’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Customers can decide on the additional charge, with the minimum amount for the service set at €1 (£0.87).

The money collected through the service will be used to invest in fuelling Savonlinja buses with Neste MY Renewable Diesel, which is produced entirely from waste and residues and is expected to reduce emissions by an average of up to 90% compared to fossil fuel diesel.

That’s equivalent to the removal of nearly 800 passenger cars from the road a year.

Harri Leskinen, Chief Business Officer at Savonlinja said: “Customers have told us that they would like to have more climate and environmentally friendly transport options. Green Travel is the answer to this. Our long term goal is to be able to use only renewable fuel in our entire fleet.”

Currently, 45 Savonlinja buses driving for the Helsinki Regional Transport Authority (HSL) – which awards subsidies for using biodiesel, bioethanol and biogas – run on renewable diesel.

Source: Energy Live News

Nearly Every US National Park Is Plagued by ‘Significant’ Air Pollution

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

A new report outlines the disastrous effects that air pollution is having on our national natural treasures.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act, a federal law that established the National Park Service (NPS). The role of NPS would be to oversee Federal areas known as national parks, monuments, and reservations. The purpose of these Federal areas, according to the Act, is to “conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”

Unfortunately, things aren’t going as planned.

According to a new report by the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA), 96 percent of America’s national parks are plagued by significant air pollution problems.

The report, “Polluted Parks: How America is Failing to Protect Our National Parks, People and Planet from Air Pollution,” looked at damage from air pollution at 417 national parks based on harm to nature, hazy skies, unhealthy air and climate change. Additional findings reveal that:

  • Eighty-five percent of national parks have air that is unhealthy to breathe at times;
  • Eighty-nine percent of parks suffer from haze pollution;
  • Soils and waters in 88 percent of parks are affected by air pollution which in turn impacts sensitive species and habitat;
  • And climate change is a significant concern for 80 percent of national parks, though all parks are affected to some level.

Since things like this become so politicized these days, it should be noted that NPCA is a non-partisan organization founded in 1919 as a citizen’s watchdog for the National Park Service. Their concern is with the state of the parks.

“The poor air quality in our national parks is both disturbing and unacceptable. Nearly every single one of our more than 400 national parks is plagued by air pollution. If we don’t take immediate action to combat this, the results will be devastating and irreversible,” said Theresa Pierno, President and CEO of NPCA.

“When people think of iconic parks like Joshua Tree or the Grand Canyon, they think of unspoiled landscapes and scenic views. I think they would be shocked to know that these are actually some of our most polluted national parks. Air pollution is also posing a health risk to some of the 330 million people who visit our parks each year, as well as the communities who surround them. The challenges facing our parks are undeniable, but so is our resolve to help clear their air and ensure they are protected as they were meant to be, by both their founders and by the laws in place to protect them.”

Indeed, when I first read the report my mind went directly to the magnificent glory that is the Grand Canyon. “How can the Grand Canyon be affected by air pollution?” I wondered?

The park’s NPS site had an answer:

“Most visitors who come to national parks expect clean air and clear views.

However, Grand Canyon National Park (NP), Arizona, world-renowned for its breathtakingly iconic views, lies downwind of polluted air from coal-fired power plants in the Four Corners region, nearby mining, and urban and industrial pollutants from Mexico and California.

Air pollutants carried into the park can harm natural and scenic resources such as forests, soils, streams, fish, and visibility.”

Of course, air pollution knows no boundaries. Much of the parks’ pollution begins with the extraction of fossil fuels – including oil, gas and coal – and burning them in power plants and vehicles. Such pollution has no problem drifting hundreds of miles, making few places immune to its devastating impact.

For the report, NPCA analyzed an array of data sources, much of it from NPS itself. The research included 417 national park sites, and looked at air pollution vis-a-vis four categories: Harm to nature, hazy skies, unhealthy air, and climate change. For each of those, the impact were ranked as significant, moderate, or little to no concern.

Harm to Nature: The findings show that air pollution is hurting sensitive species and habitat at 368 national parks. At 283 parks, the problem is of a significant concern and in 85 parks, the concern level is moderate.

Hazy Skies: At 370 parks, visibility impairment is either a moderate or significant concern (304 and 66 parks respectively).

Unhealthy Air: 354 parks have air that is unhealthy to breathe at times. At 87 parks, ozone levels are a significant concern, and another 267 parks have a moderate level of concern.

Effects of Climate Change: Climate change is a significant concern for 335 parks. These parks are experiencing changes in climate through extreme trends in temperature, precipitation, or early onset of spring.

While this isn’t an issue that should be politicized, we can’t escape the fact that politics are playing a role in this depressing state of affairs. Over the last half a century, the Clean Air Act has worked to noticeably reduce pollution. With the current administration’s far-reaching collection of rollbacks and changes to environmental policy – and its favoring of things like the fossil fuel industry – today, air pollution is on the rise. As the report notes, enforcement actions against polluters have plummeted by 85 percent, and now scientists project that we will be facing a climate crisis much sooner than previously thought.

“At a time when the climate crisis facing the planet is irrefutable, the laws that protect our climate and the air we breathe are being challenged like never before as this administration continues to prioritize polluters’ interests over the health of our people and parks,” said Stephanie Kodish, Clean Air Program Director for NPCA.

“America’s national parks are some of the most beloved places on earth and provide once in a lifetime experiences, but the iconic wildlife and irreplaceable natural and cultural resources that make these places so special are being seriously threatened by climate change and other effects of air pollution.”

Thankfully, there is a simple solution: Reduce air pollution and transition to clean energy. Nobody wants a population suffering from asthma and all the other deleterious effects of dirty air, right? And nobody wants our beautiful national parks to be choking from the same. If they are to be “unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations,” then we better get cracking.

Author: Melissa Breyer

Source: Tree Hugger

Mercedes-Benz Targets Carbon Neutral Fleet by 2039

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Mercedes-Benz has set a target to ensure its new passenger car fleet is carbon neutral by 2039.

It has also committed to ensure plug-in hybrids or all-electric vehicles (EVs) make up more than 50% of its car sales by 2030 under its ‘Ambition2039’ initiative.

The car manufacturer said it is driving its supply chain to comply with its carbon neutrality objective and is working with organisations like CDP to assess the environmental impact of its supply chain and conducting workshops with suppliers to identify effective carbon reduction measures.

Mercedes-Benz, owned by Daimler, says the upcoming ‘Factory 56’ addition to its Sindelfingen plant in Germany will produce luxury cars and EVs and use renewable energy, becoming carbon neutral from the outset.

It also aims to ensure all its European plants follow suit by 2022.

The company added: “To us, the Paris Agreement is more than an obligation – it’s our conviction. And we have set a clear course to help prevent further acceleration of climate change. However, this transformation is a huge challenge – technologically and financially. After all, we want to make sustainable mobility even more exciting, not more expensive and of course, this is also about sustainable business results.

“How do we deal with this? One way would be to shy away and just try to safeguard the status quo. But that would not serve our purpose – and certainly not our future. So, we prefer doing what our founders have done: they became system architects of a new mobility without horses. Today, our task is individual mobility without emissions.”

Source: Energy Live News

Just 7% of Cities Score ‘A’-Grade on Going Green

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

A total of 43 cities have scored an ‘A’ rating in a new climate-action ranking published by CDP.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

This means around only 7% of the 596 cities assessed scored top marks based on how effectively they are measuring and tackling greenhouse gas emissions, as well as adapting to the risks posed by climate change.

CDP awarded cities between an ‘A’ and a ‘D-’ score – an ‘A’ grade means a city demonstrates strong sustainable strategies and tracks its emissions on a consistent basis – Barcelona, London, Paris, Cape Town and Hong Kong were among this group.

Notable actions included London introducing an ultra-low emissions zone to clean up air pollution, Calgary building a new light rail system to take 23,000 cars off the road each year and Taipei fixing 2,200 water leaks since 2015.

The report shows whilst five cities, including Paris, San Francisco and Canberra, have city-wide 100% renewable energy targets, Reykjavík is the only city that has reached this stage already.

Kyra Appleby, Global Director for Cities, States and Regions at CDP, said: “Cities house more than half of the world’s population and are responsible for over 70% of the world’s energy-related carbon emissions, so they could make or break efforts to tackle climate change.

“We urge cities worldwide to step up their action, set targets in line with what the latest science says is needed to prevent dangerous climate change and transparently share their progress.”

Source: Energy Live News